Renchi Fang1, Haiyang Liu1, Xiucai Zhang1, Guofeng Dong2, Jiahui Li1, Xuebin Tian2, Zhenghai Wu3, Jiancang Zhou4, Jianming Cao5, Tieli Zhou6. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. 2. School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Huangyan, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China. 4. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. 5. School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Electronic address: wzcjming@163.com. 6. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Electronic address: wyztli@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECT: To analyze the difference in biofilm formation between carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae based on analysis of mrkH distribution and to further explore the function of mrkH for biofilm formation from the perspective of gene regulation. METHODS: 40 imipenem-resistant strains and 40 imipenem-sensitive strains were selected to conduct experiments. Carbapenem (imipenem) susceptibility test was performed by the agar-dilution method. blaKPC resistance gene, type 3 fimbriae-related coding genes (mrkA and mrkD) and regulation gene (mrkH) were screened by PCR. Biofilm formation assay was performed using crystal violet staining method in MHB. The relative expression of genes that critically involved in biofilm formation (mrkA, luxS, pgaA) and carbapenem resistance (ompk35, ompk36, acrB) were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, the mrkH cassette was cloned into pGEM-T Easy plasmid to yield pGEM:pmrkH and expressed in Escherichia coli DH5α and K. pneumoniae FK1911, and the biofilm formation assay after transformation was further tested. RESULTS: The MICs of imipenem were all more than 16 μg/mL in 40 imipenem-resistant strains and ranged from 0.125 μg/mL to 0.5 μg/mL in 40 imipenem-sensitive strains. Moreover, the blaKPC was identified in the 40 imipenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains. All 80 K. pneumoniae strains were found to carry mrkA and mrkD genes. Interestingly, the mrkH gene was detected in 43 strains, of which 32 were carbapenem-sensitive strains. The biofilm formation capacity of strains carried mrkH cassette was significantly higher than other 37 strains in MHB media. The relative expression of mrkA in K. pneumoniae carrying mrkH gene was significantly up-regulated. Importantly, the biofilm formation ability of FK1911-pGEM:pmrkH strain was more higher than the strain of FK1911 in MHB medium. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that MrkH played a crucial role in the regulation of biofilm formation by K. pneumoniae. In contrast to carbapenem-sensitive K. pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was less likely to have strong biofilm-forming capacity because it does not carry the mrkH gene.
OBJECT: To analyze the difference in biofilm formation between carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae based on analysis of mrkH distribution and to further explore the function of mrkH for biofilm formation from the perspective of gene regulation. METHODS: 40 imipenem-resistant strains and 40 imipenem-sensitive strains were selected to conduct experiments. Carbapenem (imipenem) susceptibility test was performed by the agar-dilution method. blaKPC resistance gene, type 3 fimbriae-related coding genes (mrkA and mrkD) and regulation gene (mrkH) were screened by PCR. Biofilm formation assay was performed using crystal violet staining method in MHB. The relative expression of genes that critically involved in biofilm formation (mrkA, luxS, pgaA) and carbapenem resistance (ompk35, ompk36, acrB) were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, the mrkH cassette was cloned into pGEM-T Easy plasmid to yield pGEM:pmrkH and expressed in Escherichia coli DH5α and K. pneumoniaeFK1911, and the biofilm formation assay after transformation was further tested. RESULTS: The MICs of imipenem were all more than 16 μg/mL in 40 imipenem-resistant strains and ranged from 0.125 μg/mL to 0.5 μg/mL in 40 imipenem-sensitive strains. Moreover, the blaKPC was identified in the 40 imipenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains. All 80 K. pneumoniae strains were found to carry mrkA and mrkD genes. Interestingly, the mrkH gene was detected in 43 strains, of which 32 were carbapenem-sensitive strains. The biofilm formation capacity of strains carried mrkH cassette was significantly higher than other 37 strains in MHB media. The relative expression of mrkA in K. pneumoniae carrying mrkH gene was significantly up-regulated. Importantly, the biofilm formation ability of FK1911-pGEM:pmrkH strain was more higher than the strain of FK1911 in MHB medium. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that MrkH played a crucial role in the regulation of biofilm formation by K. pneumoniae. In contrast to carbapenem-sensitive K. pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was less likely to have strong biofilm-forming capacity because it does not carry the mrkH gene.
Authors: Gabriel Mendes; João F Ramalho; Ana Bruschy-Fonseca; Luís Lito; Aida Duarte; José Melo-Cristino; Cátia Caneiras Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-01-27