Literature DB >> 33483626

Does prior surgical interventional therapy for BPH affect the oncological or functional outcomes after primary whole-gland prostate cryoablation for localized prostate cancer?

Ahmed ElShafei1,2, Molly DeWitt-Foy3, Adam Calaway1, Austin J Fernstrum1, Adonis Hijaz1, Wade Muncey1, Anood Alfahmy1, Amr Mahran1, Kirtishri Mishra1, J Stephen Jones4, Thomas J Polascik5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess whether prior interventional treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) influences oncologic or functional outcomes following primary whole-gland prostate cryoablation.
METHODS: Among 3831 men with prostate cancer who underwent primary whole-gland prostate cryoablation, we identified 160 with a history of prior BPH interventional therapy including transurethral needle ablation (n = 6), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (n = 9), or transurethral resection of the prostate (n = 145). Patients with a history of medically treated or unspecified BPH therapy were excluded from the study. Oncological and functional outcomes were compared between men with and without prior BPH interventional therapy.
RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, prior interventional BPH therapy was associated with higher risks of postoperative urinary retention (17.5% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.001) and new-onset urinary incontinence (39.9% vs. 19.4%, p > 0.001) compared with no prior therapy. Interventional BPH therapy was not correlated with the risk of developing a rectourethral fistula (p = 0.84) or new-onset erectile dysfunction (ED) at 12 months (p = 0.08) following surgery. On multivariable regression, prior interventional BPH therapy was associated with increased risk of urinary retention (OR 1.9, 95%, p = 0.015) and new-onset urinary incontinence (OR 2.13, p < 0.001). The estimated 5 years Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.3) in biochemical progression free survival between those who underwent interventional BPH therapy compared with those who did not. Local disease recurrence assessed by post cryoablation positive for-cause prostate biopsy showed no significant difference between the two groups (25.4% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.59).
CONCLUSIONS: Prior interventional BPH therapy did not affect the oncologic outcomes nor did it increase the risk of rectourethral fistula or ED in sexually performing patients prior to cryosurgery. Prior interventional BPH therapy was associated with increased risk of urinary retention and incontinence after primary whole-gland prostate cryoablation for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33483626     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00306-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  4 in total

1.  Prior transurethral resection does not increase morbidity following real-time ultrasound-guided prostate seed implantation.

Authors:  N N Stone; E R Ratnow; R G Stock
Journal:  Tech Urol       Date:  2000-06

2.  Is there a link between BPH and prostate cancer?

Authors:  R T M Chang; Roger Kirby; B J Challacombe
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: epidemiology, economics and evaluation.

Authors:  Camille Vuichoud; Kevin R Loughlin
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Older Age and Larger Prostate Volume Are Associated with Stress Urinary Incontinence after Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Shao-Hao Chen; Xue-Yi Xue; Yong Wei; Qing-Shui Zheng; Xiao-Dong Li; Jin-Bei Huang; Hai Cai; Xiong-Lin Sun; Yun-Zhi Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.