Koji Watanabe1, Yasuaki Yanagawa2, Hiroyuki Gatanaga3, Yoshimi Kikuchi2, Shinichi Oka3. 1. AIDS Clinical Center, National Center of Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: kwatanab@acc.ncgm.go.jp. 2. AIDS Clinical Center, National Center of Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 3. AIDS Clinical Center, National Center of Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus Infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Entamoeba histolytica infections are increasingly diagnosed as sexually transmitted infections in Japan. However, the stool ova-parasite examination (O&P) test has been the only approved diagnostic method used in Japan since production of the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) serum antibody test was discontinued at the end of 2017. Herein, we assessed whether an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based serological test could substitute for IFA. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used stored frozen serum samples from the Biobank of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine. A serological ELISA-based test was performed on these samples and their titers were compared with those previously measured by IFA based on the medical record data. RESULTS: Sixty seven stored frozen serum samples with differing recorded IFA antibody titers (16 samples with titers < ×100, 13 samples × 100, 16 samples × 200, 11 samples × 400, and 11 samples ≥ × 800) were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity values for ELISA vs. IFA were 92.2% [95% confidential interval: 81.5-96.9] and 87.5% [64.0-97.8], respectively. A strong correlation between the antibody titers was confirmed by a one-way ANOVA (R square 0.83, p value < 0.0001) for the two diagnostic methods. CONCLUSION: The ELISA and IFA antibody titers for E. histolytica were well correlated, and results from these methods were highly concordant. Introduction of an ELISA-based serological test for E. histolytica should be considered to improve E. histolytica infection diagnosis in Japan.
INTRODUCTION:Entamoeba histolyticainfections are increasingly diagnosed as sexually transmitted infections in Japan. However, the stool ova-parasite examination (O&P) test has been the only approved diagnostic method used in Japan since production of the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) serum antibody test was discontinued at the end of 2017. Herein, we assessed whether an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based serological test could substitute for IFA. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used stored frozen serum samples from the Biobank of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine. A serological ELISA-based test was performed on these samples and their titers were compared with those previously measured by IFA based on the medical record data. RESULTS: Sixty seven stored frozen serum samples with differing recorded IFA antibody titers (16 samples with titers < ×100, 13 samples × 100, 16 samples × 200, 11 samples × 400, and 11 samples ≥ × 800) were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity values for ELISA vs. IFA were 92.2% [95% confidential interval: 81.5-96.9] and 87.5% [64.0-97.8], respectively. A strong correlation between the antibody titers was confirmed by a one-way ANOVA (R square 0.83, p value < 0.0001) for the two diagnostic methods. CONCLUSION: The ELISA and IFA antibody titers for E. histolytica were well correlated, and results from these methods were highly concordant. Introduction of an ELISA-based serological test for E. histolytica should be considered to improve E. histolytica infection diagnosis in Japan.