Juanjuan Ma1, Li Zeng2, Tingjun Li3, Xiaofei Tian4, Lili Wang5. 1. Nursing Department, Shenzhen Shekou People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. 2. Nursing Department, Shenzhen Shekou People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: 1276128176@qq.com. 3. The Second People's Hospital of Futian District, Shenzhen, China. 4. The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China. 5. Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review synthesizes qualitative evidence on the experiences of donor families after consent to organ donation. METHODS: This robust, qualitative systematic review included an exhaustive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO PsycINFO, and CINAHL Complete. Manual searches of reference lists and gray literature were conducted to achieve a comprehensive identification of all relevant research. A qualitative study design served to capture the experiences of donor families after organ donation consent. RESULTS: A total of 6 articles that met the eligibility criteria were identified and included in this review. Three key themes emerged from the primary research: 1. family members were ambivalent about consent due to the ambiguity of brain death; 2. conversations about donation requirements proved uncomfortable; and 3. support is needed after donation. CONCLUSIONS: Family members demonstrated ongoing ambivalence and distress that lasted for weeks after organ donation due to the ambiguity of brain death. Some family members were unhappy with having been approached for a conversation about organ donation. Donor families were not always able to deal with the difficulties they faced after their decision about organ donation. Health care professionals should provide ongoing care and updated information to family members. This review helped to identify family members' needs for both psychological and financial assistance.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review synthesizes qualitative evidence on the experiences of donor families after consent to organ donation. METHODS: This robust, qualitative systematic review included an exhaustive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO PsycINFO, and CINAHL Complete. Manual searches of reference lists and gray literature were conducted to achieve a comprehensive identification of all relevant research. A qualitative study design served to capture the experiences of donor families after organ donation consent. RESULTS: A total of 6 articles that met the eligibility criteria were identified and included in this review. Three key themes emerged from the primary research: 1. family members were ambivalent about consent due to the ambiguity of brain death; 2. conversations about donation requirements proved uncomfortable; and 3. support is needed after donation. CONCLUSIONS: Family members demonstrated ongoing ambivalence and distress that lasted for weeks after organ donation due to the ambiguity of brain death. Some family members were unhappy with having been approached for a conversation about organ donation. Donor families were not always able to deal with the difficulties they faced after their decision about organ donation. Health care professionals should provide ongoing care and updated information to family members. This review helped to identify family members' needs for both psychological and financial assistance.