Corinne Keet1, Mihaela Plesa2, Daria Szelag2, Wayne Shreffler3, Robert Wood2, Joan Dunlop2, Roger Peng4, Jennifer Dantzer2, Robert G Hamilton5, Alkis Togias6, Michael Pistiner3. 1. Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md. Electronic address: Ckeet1@jhmi.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. 3. Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Mass General Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md. 5. Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. 6. Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Screening of high-risk infants for peanut allergy (PA) before introduction is now recommended in the United States, but the optimal approach is not clear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the diagnostic test characteristics of peanut skin prick test (SPT), peanut-specific IgE (sIgE), and sIgE to peanut components in a screening population of infants before known peanut exposure. METHODS: Infants aged 4 to 11 months with (1) no history of peanut ingestion, testing, or reaction and (2) (a) moderate-severe eczema, (b) history of food allergy, and/or (c) first-degree relative with a history of PA received peanut SPT, peanut-sIgE and component-IgE testing, and, depending on SPT wheal size, oral food challenge or observed feeding. Receiver-operator characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared, and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 321 subjects completed the enrollment visit (median age, 7.2 months; 58% males), and 37 (11%) were found to have PA. Overall, Ara h 2-sIgE at a cutoff point of 0.1 kUa/L discriminated between allergic and nonallergic best (AUC, 0.96; sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 98%), compared with peanut-sIgE at 0.1 kUa/L (AUC, 0.89; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 78%) or 0.35 kUa/L (AUC, 0.91; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 86%), or SPT at wheal size 3 mm (AUC, 0.90; sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 88%) or 8 mm (AUC, 0.87; sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 99%). Ara h 1-sIgE and Ara h 3-sIgE did not add to prediction of PA when included in a model with Ara h 2-sIgE, and Ara h 8-sIgE discriminated poorly (AUC, 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of only Ara h 2-sIgE should be considered if screening of high-risk infants is performed before peanut introduction.
BACKGROUND: Screening of high-risk infants for peanut allergy (PA) before introduction is now recommended in the United States, but the optimal approach is not clear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the diagnostic test characteristics of peanut skin prick test (SPT), peanut-specific IgE (sIgE), and sIgE to peanut components in a screening population of infants before known peanut exposure. METHODS: Infants aged 4 to 11 months with (1) no history of peanut ingestion, testing, or reaction and (2) (a) moderate-severe eczema, (b) history of food allergy, and/or (c) first-degree relative with a history of PA received peanut SPT, peanut-sIgE and component-IgE testing, and, depending on SPT wheal size, oral food challenge or observed feeding. Receiver-operator characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared, and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 321 subjects completed the enrollment visit (median age, 7.2 months; 58% males), and 37 (11%) were found to have PA. Overall, Ara h 2-sIgE at a cutoff point of 0.1 kUa/L discriminated between allergic and nonallergic best (AUC, 0.96; sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 98%), compared with peanut-sIgE at 0.1 kUa/L (AUC, 0.89; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 78%) or 0.35 kUa/L (AUC, 0.91; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 86%), or SPT at wheal size 3 mm (AUC, 0.90; sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 88%) or 8 mm (AUC, 0.87; sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 99%). Ara h 1-sIgE and Ara h 3-sIgE did not add to prediction of PA when included in a model with Ara h 2-sIgE, and Ara h 8-sIgE discriminated poorly (AUC, 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of only Ara h 2-sIgE should be considered if screening of high-risk infants is performed before peanut introduction.
Authors: Lucila C Lopes de Oliveira; Martina Aderhold; Marianne Brill; Gabriele Schulz; Claudia Rolinck-Werninghaus; E N Clare Mills; Bodo Niggemann; Charles Kirov Naspitz; Ulrich Wahn; Kirsten Beyer Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2013-06-28
Authors: Alkis Togias; Susan F Cooper; Maria L Acebal; Amal Assa'ad; James R Baker; Lisa A Beck; Julie Block; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Edmond S Chan; Lawrence F Eichenfield; David M Fleischer; George J Fuchs; Glenn T Furuta; Matthew J Greenhawt; Ruchi S Gupta; Michele Habich; Stacie M Jones; Kari Keaton; Antonella Muraro; Marshall Plaut; Lanny J Rosenwasser; Daniel Rotrosen; Hugh A Sampson; Lynda C Schneider; Scott H Sicherer; Robert Sidbury; Jonathan Spergel; David R Stukus; Carina Venter; Joshua A Boyce Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: R J B Klemans; H van Os-Medendorp; M Blankestijn; C A F M Bruijnzeel-Koomen; E F Knol; A C Knulst Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Joshua A Boyce; Amal Assa'ad; A Wesley Burks; Stacie M Jones; Hugh A Sampson; Robert A Wood; Marshall Plaut; Susan F Cooper; Matthew J Fenton; S Hasan Arshad; Sami L Bahna; Lisa A Beck; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Carlos A Camargo; Lawrence Eichenfield; Glenn T Furuta; Jon M Hanifin; Carol Jones; Monica Kraft; Bruce D Levy; Phil Lieberman; Stefano Luccioli; Kathleen M McCall; Lynda C Schneider; Ronald A Simon; F Estelle R Simons; Stephen J Teach; Barbara P Yawn; Julie M Schwaninger Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Mona I Kidon; Soad Haj Yahia; Diti Machnes-Maayan; Yael Levy; Shirli Frizinsky; Ramit Maoz-Segal; Irena Offenganden; Ron S Kenett; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Ran Hovav Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 3.418