Literature DB >> 33482936

Inequity and Women Physicians: Time to Change Millennia of Societal Beliefs.

Connie Newman1,2, Kim Templeton2,3, Eliza Lo Chin4.   

Abstract

Gender inequities date back thousands of years, with women expected to be caregivers at home and men expected to be leaders with occupations outside the home. In more recent history, women have trained in various professions, including medicine. Although the number of female physicians has risen consistently over the past several decades and half of US medical students now are women, gender inequities persist and are due, at least in part, to implicit (unconscious) biases held by doctors, other health care professionals, and patients and their families. Implicit biases negatively affect women in their medical careers and contribute to slower advancement, less favorable evaluations, underrepresentation in leadership positions, fewer invited lectures, lower salaries, impostor syndrome, and burnout. Despite efforts to address gender biases, studies in academic medical centers indicate no major change over a 20-year span. Management of implicit gender bias at the organizational level is imperative. Strategies include implicit bias training for doctors and other staff; development of a transparent and equitable compensation plan; and transparent processes for promotion and hiring, mentorship, and sponsorship of women physicians for grand rounds, lectureships, committees, leadership positions, and awards. Achievement of equity for women physicians requires effort and ultimately a culture change. Gender equity in the medical profession will lead to improved physician wellness, retention of women physicians, and improved access to and quality of health care.
Copyright © 2020 The Permanente Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33482936      PMCID: PMC7849280          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/20.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  30 in total

1.  Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine.

Authors:  P L Carr; A S Ash; R H Friedman; L Szalacha; R C Barnett; A Palepu; M M Moskowitz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; D E McGhee; J L Schwartz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-06

3.  Achieving women's equity in academic medicine: challenging the standards.

Authors:  Jeanine D'Armiento; Susan S Witte; Kuheli Dutt; Melanie Wall; Geraldine McAllister
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Stuck in the out-group: Jennifer can't grow up, Jane's invisible, and Janet's over the hill.

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  How gender determines the way we speak about professionals.

Authors:  Stav Atir; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; Chloe S Slocum; Anna M Bank; Saurabha Bhatnagar; Cheri A Blauwet; Julie A Poorman; Amparo Villablanca; Sareh Parangi
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias.

Authors:  Julia A Files; Anita P Mayer; Marcia G Ko; Patricia Friedrich; Marjorie Jenkins; Michael J Bryan; Suneela Vegunta; Christopher M Wittich; Melissa A Lyle; Ryan Melikian; Trevor Duston; Yu-Hui H Chang; Sharonne N Hayes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Disentangling physician sex and physician communication style: their effects on patient satisfaction in a virtual medical visit.

Authors:  Marianne Schmid Mast; Judith A Hall; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-05-04

Review 9.  Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chloë FitzGerald; Samia Hurst
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Stereotypes about surgeon warmth and competence: The role of surgeon gender.

Authors:  Claire E Ashton-James; Joshua M Tybur; Verena Grießer; Daniel Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Patient Prejudice on Minoritized Female Physicians.

Authors:  Cheryl Dellasega; Jane-Frances Aruma; Natasha Sood; Doerthe A Andreae
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.