Guillermo E Parada1,2, Roberto Munita3, Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares1,4, Hugo J R Fernandes5, Veronika R Kedlian1, Emmanouil Metzakopian5, Maria Estela Andres3, Eric A Miska6,7,8, Martin Hemberg9,10. 1. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK. 2. Wellcome Trust Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK. 3. Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 4. Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. 5. UK Dementia Research Institute, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK. 6. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK. eam29@cam.ac.uk. 7. Wellcome Trust Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK. eam29@cam.ac.uk. 8. Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK. eam29@cam.ac.uk. 9. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK. mh26@sanger.ac.uk. 10. Wellcome Trust Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK. mh26@sanger.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microexons, exons that are ≤ 30 nucleotides, are a highly conserved and dynamically regulated set of cassette exons. They have key roles in nervous system development and function, as evidenced by recent results demonstrating the impact of microexons on behaviour and cognition. However, microexons are often overlooked due to the difficulty of detecting them using standard RNA-seq aligners. RESULTS: Here, we present MicroExonator, a novel pipeline for reproducible de novo discovery and quantification of microexons. We process 289 RNA-seq datasets from eighteen mouse tissues corresponding to nine embryonic and postnatal stages, providing the most comprehensive survey of microexons available for mice. We detect 2984 microexons, 332 of which are differentially spliced throughout mouse embryonic brain development, including 29 that are not present in mouse transcript annotation databases. Unsupervised clustering of microexons based on their inclusion patterns segregates brain tissues by developmental time, and further analysis suggests a key function for microexons in axon growth and synapse formation. Finally, we analyse single-cell RNA-seq data from the mouse visual cortex, and for the first time, we report differential inclusion between neuronal subpopulations, suggesting that some microexons could be cell type-specific. CONCLUSIONS: MicroExonator facilitates the investigation of microexons in transcriptome studies, particularly when analysing large volumes of data. As a proof of principle, we use MicroExonator to analyse a large collection of both mouse bulk and single-cell RNA-seq datasets. The analyses enabled the discovery of previously uncharacterized microexons, and our study provides a comprehensive microexon inclusion catalogue during mouse development.
BACKGROUND: Microexons, exons that are ≤ 30 nucleotides, are a highly conserved and dynamically regulated set of cassette exons. They have key roles in nervous system development and function, as evidenced by recent results demonstrating the impact of microexons on behaviour and cognition. However, microexons are often overlooked due to the difficulty of detecting them using standard RNA-seq aligners. RESULTS: Here, we present MicroExonator, a novel pipeline for reproducible de novo discovery and quantification of microexons. We process 289 RNA-seq datasets from eighteen mouse tissues corresponding to nine embryonic and postnatal stages, providing the most comprehensive survey of microexons available for mice. We detect 2984 microexons, 332 of which are differentially spliced throughout mouse embryonic brain development, including 29 that are not present in mouse transcript annotation databases. Unsupervised clustering of microexons based on their inclusion patterns segregates brain tissues by developmental time, and further analysis suggests a key function for microexons in axon growth and synapse formation. Finally, we analyse single-cell RNA-seq data from the mouse visual cortex, and for the first time, we report differential inclusion between neuronal subpopulations, suggesting that some microexons could be cell type-specific. CONCLUSIONS: MicroExonator facilitates the investigation of microexons in transcriptome studies, particularly when analysing large volumes of data. As a proof of principle, we use MicroExonator to analyse a large collection of both mouse bulk and single-cell RNA-seq datasets. The analyses enabled the discovery of previously uncharacterized microexons, and our study provides a comprehensive microexon inclusion catalogue during mouse development.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alternative splicing; Microexons; Neuronal development; Reproducible software; Single-cell; Splicing
Authors: D Karolchik; R Baertsch; M Diekhans; T S Furey; A Hinrichs; Y T Lu; K M Roskin; M Schwartz; C W Sugnet; D J Thomas; R J Weber; D Haussler; W J Kent Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Björn Grüning; Ryan Dale; Andreas Sjödin; Brad A Chapman; Jillian Rowe; Christopher H Tomkins-Tinch; Renan Valieris; Johannes Köster Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Benoit Laurent; Lv Ruitu; Jernej Murn; Kristina Hempel; Ryan Ferrao; Yang Xiang; Shichong Liu; Benjamin A Garcia; Hao Wu; Feizhen Wu; Hanno Steen; Yang Shi Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Xiaochang Zhang; Ming Hui Chen; Xuebing Wu; Andrew Kodani; Jean Fan; Ryan Doan; Manabu Ozawa; Jacqueline Ma; Nobuaki Yoshida; Jeremy F Reiter; Douglas L Black; Peter V Kharchenko; Phillip A Sharp; Christopher A Walsh Journal: Cell Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jennifer Harrow; France Denoeud; Adam Frankish; Alexandre Reymond; Chao-Kung Chen; Jacqueline Chrast; Julien Lagarde; James G R Gilbert; Roy Storey; David Swarbreck; Colette Rossier; Catherine Ucla; Tim Hubbard; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Roderic Guigo Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2006-08-07 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Bosiljka Tasic; Vilas Menon; Thuc Nghi Nguyen; Tae Kyung Kim; Tim Jarsky; Zizhen Yao; Boaz Levi; Lucas T Gray; Staci A Sorensen; Tim Dolbeare; Darren Bertagnolli; Jeff Goldy; Nadiya Shapovalova; Sheana Parry; Changkyu Lee; Kimberly Smith; Amy Bernard; Linda Madisen; Susan M Sunkin; Michael Hawrylycz; Christof Koch; Hongkui Zeng Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Javier Tapial; Kevin C H Ha; Timothy Sterne-Weiler; André Gohr; Ulrich Braunschweig; Antonio Hermoso-Pulido; Mathieu Quesnel-Vallières; Jon Permanyer; Reza Sodaei; Yamile Marquez; Luca Cozzuto; Xinchen Wang; Melisa Gómez-Velázquez; Teresa Rayon; Miguel Manzanares; Julia Ponomarenko; Benjamin J Blencowe; Manuel Irimia Journal: Genome Res Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Fredrik Salmen; Joachim De Jonghe; Tomasz S Kaminski; Anna Alemany; Guillermo E Parada; Joe Verity-Legg; Ayaka Yanagida; Timo N Kohler; Nicholas Battich; Floris van den Brekel; Anna L Ellermann; Alfonso Martinez Arias; Jennifer Nichols; Martin Hemberg; Florian Hollfelder; Alexander van Oudenaarden Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 68.164