Literature DB >> 33482726

Comparison and interpretation of characteristics of Rhizosphere microbiomes of three blueberry varieties.

Yan Zhang1, Wei Wang1, Zhangjun Shen1, Jingjing Wang1, Yajun Chen1, Dong Wang1, Gang Liu2, Maozhen Han3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies on the rhizosphere microbiome of various plants proved that rhizosphere microbiota carries out various vital functions and can regulate the growth and improve the yield of plants. However, the rhizosphere microbiome of commercial blueberry was only reported by a few studies and remains elusive. Comparison and interpretation of the characteristics of the rhizosphere microbiome of blueberry are critical important to maintain its health.
RESULTS: In this study, a total of 20 rhizosphere soil samples, including 15 rhizosphere soil samples from three different blueberry varieties and five bulk soil samples, were sequenced with a high-throughput sequencing strategy. Based on these sequencing datasets, we profiled the taxonomical, functional, and phenotypic compositions of rhizosphere microbial communities for three different blueberry varieties and compared our results with a previous study focused on the rhizosphere microbiome of blueberry varieties. Our results demonstrated significant differences in alpha diversity and beta diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities of different blueberry varieties and bulk soil. The distribution patterns of taxonomical, functional, and phenotypic compositions of rhizosphere microbiome differ across the blueberry varieties. The rhizosphere microbial communities of three different blueberry varieties could be distinctly separated, and 28 discriminative biomarkers were selected to distinguish these three blueberry varieties. Core rhizosphere microbiota for blueberry was identified, and it contained 201 OTUs, which were mainly affiliated with Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria. Moreover, the interactions between OTUs of blueberry rhizosphere microbial communities were explored by a co-occurrence network of OTUs from an ecological perspective.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study explored the characteristics of blueberry's rhizosphere microbial community, such as the beneficial microorganisms and core microbiome, and provided an integrative perspective on blueberry's rhizosphere microbiome, which beneficial to blueberry health and production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Blueberry; Co-occurrence network; Rhizosphere microbial community; Rhizosphere microbiome

Year:  2021        PMID: 33482726      PMCID: PMC7821519          DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02092-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Microbiol        ISSN: 1471-2180            Impact factor:   3.605


  51 in total

Review 1.  Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens.

Authors:  David M Weller; Jos M Raaijmakers; Brian B McSpadden Gardener; Linda S Thomashow
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2002-05-13       Impact factor: 13.078

2.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mendes; Marco Kruijt; Irene de Bruijn; Ester Dekkers; Menno van der Voort; Johannes H M Schneider; Yvette M Piceno; Todd Z DeSantis; Gary L Andersen; Peter A H M Bakker; Jos M Raaijmakers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere.

Authors:  Lucas W Mendes; Eiko E Kuramae; Acácio A Navarrete; Johannes A van Veen; Siu M Tsai
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Septoria Leaf Spot Reduces Flower Bud Set and Yield Potential of Rabbiteye and Southern Highbush Blueberries.

Authors:  P S Ojiambo; H Scherm; P M Brannen
Journal:  Plant Dis       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Alterations of the gut microbiota in high-fat diet mice is strongly linked to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Yi Qiao; Jin Sun; Yinyi Ding; Guowei Le; Yonghui Shi
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Grapevine rootstocks shape underground bacterial microbiome and networking but not potential functionality.

Authors:  Ramona Marasco; Eleonora Rolli; Marco Fusi; Grégoire Michoud; Daniele Daffonchio
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  Metagenome-Wide Association Study and Machine Learning Prediction of Bulk Soil Microbiome and Crop Productivity.

Authors:  Hao-Xun Chang; James S Haudenshield; Charles R Bowen; Glen L Hartman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Environmental Filtering of Microbial Communities in Agricultural Soil Shifts with Crop Growth.

Authors:  Sarah K Hargreaves; Ryan J Williams; Kirsten S Hofmockel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative Analysis of Rhizosphere Microbiomes of Southern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.), Darrow's Blueberry (V. darrowii Camp), and Rabbiteye Blueberry (V. virgatum Aiton).

Authors:  Jiangang Li; Olga V Mavrodi; Jinfeng Hou; Chazden Blackmon; Ebrahiem M Babiker; Dmitri V Mavrodi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diversity and structure of the rhizosphere microbial communities of wild and cultivated ginseng.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Fang; Huaying Wang; Ling Zhao; Manqi Wang; Mingzhou Sun
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.605

2.  Diversity and structural characteristics of soil microbial communities in different habitats of wild Lilium regale Wilson in Wenchuan area.

Authors:  Jie Xie; Ze Wu; Xiaoyu Zhang; Tong Peng; Chunmei Yang; Jianjun Zhang; Jian Liang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.