Literature DB >> 3348249

Science in medicine: too much or too little and too limited in scope?

L Eisenberg1.   

Abstract

Contrary to the common assertion that there is too much science in medicine, it is precisely the application of the natural sciences in the clinic that has enhanced the diagnostic and therapeutic powers of the physician. Much of the criticism of science in medicine mistakes the technology made possible by science, and the way that technology is employed, for science itself. What has hampered progress is too narrow a view of the sciences relevant to medicine. The concepts and methods of the social sciences must be integrated into medical education if physicians are to be enabled to respond effectively to illness as a human experience. Nonetheless, without major changes in the social context of medical practice, efforts to improve performance through curriculum reform will be futile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3348249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  5 in total

1.  The role of medical school admissions committees in the decline of physician-scientists.

Authors:  Eric G Neilson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  James Mackenzie lecture 1989. Reactive and proactive care: a crisis.

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The physician scientist: an endangered but far from extinct species.

Authors:  D J Weatherall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-27

4.  Experts and evidence.

Authors:  R J Taylor
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Clinical practice and medical research: bridging the divide between the two cultures.

Authors:  P Owen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.