Literature DB >> 33481837

Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments?

David Hutto1, Kyle Barrett1.   

Abstract

Urbanization is among the largest threats to wildlife populations through factors such as fragmentation, isolation, and habitat destruction. Urban open spaces, such as parks and golf courses, have the potential to provide wildlife with suitable habitat within an urbanized matrix. These refugia may be particularly important for amphibians, which represent one of the most endangered and least vagile vertebrate groups on earth. During the spring and summer of 2018, we conducted surveys to determine the presence of anurans at 51 wetland sites within the Piedmont ecoregion of South Carolina. Nearly one-third of these wetlands were located within urban open spaces, one-third in low development areas, and one-third in highly developed areas. Impervious surface and total road length surrounding the wetlands were measured at two scales, a core habitat scale (300 m) and average maximum migration scale (750 m), and we measured several within-wetland habitat variables. Urban Open Space wetlands had levels of surrounding impervious surface similar to High Urbanization wetlands at the larger scale and were intermediate between Low and High Urbanization wetlands at the smaller scale. The total length of road segments occurring within buffers (at both scales) surrounding our study wetlands was higher for Urban Open Space compared to Low and High Urbanization sites. Among the within-wetland variables measured, Low Urbanization sites had higher canopy cover and were more likely to have a terrestrial buffer zone relative to the other categories. Species richness decreased significantly as total road length increased among all wetlands. Wetland category was not a significant driver explaining species richness, but β-diversity was more variable among Urban Open Space wetlands than either Low or High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands did not appear to increase suitability for anurans relative to High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands had higher variability in species composition, which was perhaps attributable to the diversity among sites represented in the Urban Open Space category.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33481837      PMCID: PMC7822500          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  15 in total

1.  Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide.

Authors:  Simon N Stuart; Janice S Chanson; Neil A Cox; Bruce E Young; Ana S L Rodrigues; Debra L Fischman; Robert W Waller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Colloquium paper: are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians.

Authors:  David B Wake; Vance T Vredenburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Value of artificial habitats for amphibian reproduction in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Adrianne B Brand; Joel W Snodgrass
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 4.  Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.

Authors:  Mark A Goddard; Andrew J Dougill; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Local and landscape determinants of amphibian communities in urban ponds.

Authors:  Andrew J Hamer; Kirsten M Parris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient.

Authors:  C Denys; Holger Schmidt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.

Authors:  Richard A Fuller; Katherine N Irvine; Patrick Devine-Wright; Philip H Warren; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Effects of terrestrial buffer zones on amphibians on golf courses.

Authors:  Holly J Puglis; Michelle D Boone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Effects of Recreation on Animals Revealed as Widespread through a Global Systematic Review.

Authors:  Courtney L Larson; Sarah E Reed; Adina M Merenlender; Kevin R Crooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantifying climate sensitivity and climate-driven change in North American amphibian communities.

Authors:  David A W Miller; Evan H Campbell Grant; Erin Muths; Staci M Amburgey; Michael J Adams; Maxwell B Joseph; J Hardin Waddle; Pieter T J Johnson; Maureen E Ryan; Benedikt R Schmidt; Daniel L Calhoun; Courtney L Davis; Robert N Fisher; David M Green; Blake R Hossack; Tracy A G Rittenhouse; Susan C Walls; Larissa L Bailey; Sam S Cruickshank; Gary M Fellers; Thomas A Gorman; Carola A Haas; Ward Hughson; David S Pilliod; Steven J Price; Andrew M Ray; Walt Sadinski; Daniel Saenz; William J Barichivich; Adrianne Brand; Cheryl S Brehme; Rosi Dagit; Katy S Delaney; Brad M Glorioso; Lee B Kats; Patrick M Kleeman; Christopher A Pearl; Carlton J Rochester; Seth P D Riley; Mark Roth; Brent H Sigafus
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.