PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown an association of sarcopenia with adverse short- and long-term outcomes in multiple gastrointestinal cancer types. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of sarcopenia on the postoperative outcomes and survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. We included studies that compared postoperative outcomes or survival rates in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients with CRC. RESULTS: A total of 44 observational studies, comprising 18,891 patients, were included. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was 37% (n = 7009). The pooled analysis revealed an association between sarcopenia and higher risk of total postoperative complications (23 studies, OR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.35-2.49), postoperative severe complications (OR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.68), postoperative mortality (OR = 3.21; 95% CI 2.01-5.11), postoperative infections (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.12-1.76), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (OR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.96-4.37), and prolonged length of stay (MD = 0.77; 95% CI 0.44-1.11) after colorectal cancer surgery. However, anastomotic leakage showed comparable occurrence between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.36). Regarding survival outcomes, sarcopenic patients had significantly shorter overall survival (25 studies, HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.57-2.14), disease-free survival (HR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.29-1.88), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.40-2.23) as compared with non-sarcopenic patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients with colorectal cancer, sarcopenia is a strong predictor of increased postoperative complications and worse survival outcomes.
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown an association of sarcopenia with adverse short- and long-term outcomes in multiple gastrointestinal cancer types. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of sarcopenia on the postoperative outcomes and survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. We included studies that compared postoperative outcomes or survival rates in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients with CRC. RESULTS: A total of 44 observational studies, comprising 18,891 patients, were included. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was 37% (n = 7009). The pooled analysis revealed an association between sarcopenia and higher risk of total postoperative complications (23 studies, OR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.35-2.49), postoperative severe complications (OR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.68), postoperative mortality (OR = 3.21; 95% CI 2.01-5.11), postoperative infections (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.12-1.76), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (OR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.96-4.37), and prolonged length of stay (MD = 0.77; 95% CI 0.44-1.11) after colorectal cancer surgery. However, anastomotic leakage showed comparable occurrence between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.36). Regarding survival outcomes, sarcopenic patients had significantly shorter overall survival (25 studies, HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.57-2.14), disease-free survival (HR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.29-1.88), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.40-2.23) as compared with non-sarcopenic patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients with colorectal cancer, sarcopenia is a strong predictor of increased postoperative complications and worse survival outcomes.
Authors: G F P Aleixo; S S Shachar; K A Nyrop; H B Muss; Luis Malpica; G R Williams Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Casper Simonsen; Pieter de Heer; Eik D Bjerre; Charlotte Suetta; Pernille Hojman; Bente K Pedersen; Lars B Svendsen; Jesper F Christensen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Maximilian Thormann; Jazan Omari; Maciej Pech; Robert Damm; Roland Croner; Aristotelis Perrakis; Alexandra Strobel; Andreas Wienke; Alexey Surov Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Mayra Tardelli de Jesus Testa; Paola Sanches Cella; Poliana Camila Marinello; Fernando Tadeu Trevisan Frajacomo; Camila de Souza Padilha; Patricia Chimin Perandini; Felipe Arruda Moura; José Alberto Duarte; Rubens Cecchini; Flavia Alessandra Guarnier; Rafael Deminice Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Francisco López-Rodríguez-Arias; Luis Sánchez-Guillén; Verónica Aranaz-Ostáriz; Daniel Triguero-Cánovas; Sandra Lario-Pérez; Xavier Barber-Valles; Francisco J Lacueva; José M Ramirez; Antonio Arroyo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael Schneider; Martin Hübner; Fabio Becce; Joachim Koerfer; Jean-Aibert Collinot; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser; Fabian Grass; David Martin Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2021-08-22 Impact factor: 12.910