| Literature DB >> 33481002 |
Alexander Van Nynatten1,2, Gianni M Castiglione1,3, Eduardo de A Gutierrez3, Nathan R Lovejoy1,2,3, Belinda S W Chang1,3,4.
Abstract
Rhodopsin, the light-sensitive visual pigment expressed in rod photoreceptors, is specialized for vision in dim-light environments. Aquatic environments are particularly challenging for vision due to the spectrally dependent attenuation of light, which can differ greatly in marine and freshwater systems. Among fish lineages that have successfully colonized freshwater habitats from ancestrally marine environments, croakers are known as highly visual benthic predators. In this study, we isolate rhodopsins from a diversity of freshwater and marine croakers and find that strong positive selection in rhodopsin is associated with a marine to freshwater transition in South American croakers. In order to determine if this is accompanied by significant shifts in visual abilities, we resurrected ancestral rhodopsin sequences and tested the experimental properties of ancestral pigments bracketing this transition using in vitro spectroscopic assays. We found the ancestral freshwater croaker rhodopsin is redshifted relative to its marine ancestor, with mutations that recapitulate ancestral amino acid changes along this transitional branch resulting in faster kinetics that are likely to be associated with more rapid dark adaptation. This could be advantageous in freshwater due to the redshifted spectrum and relatively narrow interface and frequent transitions between bright and dim-light environments. This study is the first to experimentally demonstrate that positively selected substitutions in ancestral visual pigments alter protein function to freshwater visual environments following a transition from an ancestrally marine state and provides insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying some of the physiological changes associated with this major habitat transition.Entities:
Keywords: clade models of molecular evolution; evolution of fish vision; likelihood-based codon models; rhodopsin spectral tuning; underwater visual ecology
Year: 2021 PMID: 33481002 PMCID: PMC8097279 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Evol ISSN: 0737-4038 Impact factor: 16.240
Fig. 1.Schematic of underwater light environments. Data adapted from Jerlov (1968) and Costa et al. (2013).
Fig. 2.Tests for positive selection on rhodopsin associated with habitat transitions. (A) Bayesian phylogeny used for PAML analyses. Branch lengths scaled by the number of substitutions per codon. Divergence time estimates for invasions into freshwater from Lo et al. (2015). (B) Branch sites and CmD dN/dS estimates for the divergent site class with the marine to freshwater transitional branches in the world-wide croaker rhodopsin data set as the foreground. Each bar is colored to match foreground which is indicated by a vertical black bar. (C) Branch sites and CmD dN/dS estimates for the divergent site class for models with the marine lineages, the freshwater clade, and the transitional branch set as the foreground in the New World clade croaker rhodopsin data set. (D) CmD dN/dS estimates for nonvisual control genes using the same ecological partitioning scheme.
Fig. 3.Habitat specificity of positively selected sites in croaker rhodopsin. (A) Positively selected sites on transmembrane helices shown on the rhodopsin dark-state crystal structure (1U19) looking down from the intradiscal face. (B) Distance from the chromophore and root mean square deviation between the dark (1U19) and light (3PQR) state rhodopsin crystal structures for each positively selected site. Histograms show the number of positively selected sites in each partition within ten angstroms of the chromophore where spectral tuning sites have been observed (Bowmaker and Hunt 2006). (C) Positively selected sites on each transmembrane helix shown arranged in order with the chromophore to the left. Sites under positive selection in more than one partition are indicated by an ampersand of the same color as the additional partition.
Fig. 4.Functional characterization of resurrected croaker rhodopsin sequences bracketing the transitional branch. (A) Spectral absorbance curves of dark state rhodopsin shown for marine (blue) and freshwater (red) ancestral croaker rhodopsin pigments expressed in vitro (Govardovskii et al. 2000). (B) Retinal release rate for bovine rhodopsin and bovine rhodopsin with substitutions matching the marine and freshwater croaker sequences at site 119, 122, 124, and 261. Marine substitutions previously published in Castiglione and Chang (2018). (C) Bar chart comparing retinal release rate half-life for each pigment.