Literature DB >> 33480643

Predicting the Behaviour of Humeral Shaft Fractures: An Independent Validation Study of the Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral Fractures (RUSHU) and Value of Assessing Fracture Mobility.

Andrew P Dekker1, Simran Chuttha, Amol A Tambe, David I Clark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To externally validate the Radiographic Union Score for Humeral fractures (RUSHU) and to quantify the predictive relationship of fracture motion on physical examination to non-union.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Single institutional centre (University teaching hospital). PATIENTS: 92 consecutive patients undergoing non-operative treatment of a diaphyseal humeral shaft fracture were identified over a 4-year period. The average age of the population was 62 years and 42% of the cohort was male. INTERVENTION: Clinical examination for fracture stability was routinely performed on patients by the treating physicians. Radiographic assessment of fracture callus (RUSHU score) at 6-weeks was retrospectively determined. Patients were followed up until union. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Stability was graded as motion at the fracture site or the humerus moving as a single functional unit.
RESULTS: Fractures with RUSHU score ≤7 were 14 times more likely to proceed to non-union at 6-months (78% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The time to union was 49 weeks for a RUSHU score of ≤7 versus 16 weeks for a RUSHU score of ≥8. The number of operations needed to avoid one non-union was 1.7. Fractures mobile at 6-weeks were 6.5 times more likely to proceed to non-union at 6-months (77% specificity, 67% sensitivity). Mobile fractures had a longer time to union (41 weeks) than non-mobile fractures (17 weeks).
CONCLUSION: The RUSHU score and clinical assessment of fracture mobility are effective and valid tools in identifying patients at risk of developing non-union of humeral shaft fractures and can enhance early decision making in fracture management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33480643     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  3 in total

1.  Comment on "A comparative study of 6-week and 12-week Radiographic Union Scores for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) as a predictor of humeral shaft non-union".

Authors:  William M Oliver; Nicholas D Clement; Andrew D Duckworth
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)-a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dennis Karimi; Stig Brorson; Kaare S Midtgaard; Tore Fjalestad; Aksel Paulsen; Per Olerud; Carl Ekholm; Olof Wolf; Bjarke Viberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Routine fixation of humeral shaft fractures is cost-effective : cost-utility analysis of 215 patients at a mean of five years following nonoperative management.

Authors:  William M Oliver; Samuel G Molyneux; Timothy O White; Nick D Clement; Andrew D Duckworth
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.