Literature DB >> 33479882

Ruling out underlying infection in 200 presumed aseptic knee and hip revision arthroplasties using a multiplex PCR system.

Anouk M E Jacobs1, Petra J C Heesterbeek2, Frans A T Bovendeert3, Saskia Susan2, Jacques F Meis4,5, Jon H M Goosen3.   

Abstract

Ruling out an infection in one-stage knee and hip revisions for presumed aseptic failure by conventional tissue cultures takes up to 14 days. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) is a quick test (4-5 h) for detecting pathogens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an automated mPCR of synovial fluid obtained intraoperatively in unsuspected knee and hip revisions. A prospective study was conducted with 200 patients undergoing a one-stage knee or hip revision. Synovial fluid was analyzed with the mPCR Unyvero implant and tissue infection G2 cartridge (U-ITI G2) system and compared to intraoperative tissue cultures. The primary outcome measure was the diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), of the mPCR U-ITI G2 system compared to conventional cultures. In the knee revision group, there were no patients with a positive mPCR in combination with positive cultures. This resulted in a non-calculable sensitivity and PPV. The specificity and NPV in the knee revision group of the mPCR compared to tissue cultures was 96.8% and 96.8%, respectively. In the hip revision group, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the mPCR compared to tissue cultures was 36.4%, 96.6%, 57.1%, and 92.5%, respectively. Sixteen mismatches occurred between the mPCR and tissue cultures. The mPCR U-ITI G2 system is a quick and reliable synovium fluid test for ruling out infection in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions with a high NPV compared with tissue cultures, although some mismatches were observed. Periprosthetic tissue cultures are still advised as back-up for false negative and positive mPCR test results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostics; Hip revision arthroplasty; Infection; Knee revision arthroplasty; Unyvero; mPCR

Year:  2021        PMID: 33479882     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04155-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  22 in total

Review 1.  The diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  E Moran; I Byren; B L Atkins
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Unyvero i60 implant and tissue infection (ITI) multiplex PCR system in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Gunnar T R Hischebeth; Thomas M Randau; Johanna K Buhr; Matthias D Wimmer; Achim Hoerauf; Ernst Molitor; Isabelle Bekeredjian-Ding; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 3.  Prosthetic-joint infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Douglas R Osmon; Elie F Berbari; Anthony R Berendt; Daniel Lew; Werner Zimmerli; James M Steckelberg; Nalini Rao; Arlen Hanssen; Walter R Wilson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Epidemiology and new developments in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Stéphane Corvec; María E Portillo; Bruna Maria Pasticci; Olivier Borens; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.595

6.  The unsuspected prosthetic joint infection : incidence and consequences of positive intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions.

Authors:  A M E Jacobs; M Bénard; J F Meis; G van Hellemondt; J H M Goosen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Optimization of periprosthetic culture for diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Susan M Butler-Wu; Erica M Burns; Paul S Pottinger; Amalia S Magaret; Jennifer L Rakeman; Frederick A Matsen; Brad T Cookson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Incidence of low-grade infection in aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dirk Jan F Moojen; Gijs van Hellemondt; H Charles Vogely; Bart J Burger; Geert H I M Walenkamp; Niek J A Tulp; B Wim Schreurs; Frank R A J de Meulemeester; Corrie S Schot; Ingrid van de Pol; Takaaki Fujishiro; Leo M Schouls; Thomas W Bauer; Wouter J A Dhert
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening.

Authors:  Marta Fernandez-Sampedro; Carlos Salas-Venero; Concepción Fariñas-Álvarez; Manuel Sumillera; Luis Pérez-Carro; Michel Fakkas-Fernandez; Javier Gómez-Román; Luis Martínez-Martínez; María Carmen Fariñas
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Are There Benefits In Early Diagnosis Of Prosthetic Joint Infection With Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction?

Authors:  Christian Lausmann; Akos Zahar; Mustafa Citak; Julian Brañes; Stefan Schmidl; Lars Frommelt; Thorsten Gehrke; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2017-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.