| Literature DB >> 33479695 |
Micael Rodrigues Cunha1,2, Rajesh Bhardwaj3, Aline Lucie Carrel1, Sonja Lindinger4, Christoph Romanin4, Roberto Parise-Filho2, Matthias A Hediger3, Jean-Louis Reymond1.
Abstract
Transient receptor potential vanilloid 6 (TRPV6) is a calcium channel implicated in multifactorial diseases and overexpressed in numerous cancers. We recently reported the phenyl-cyclohexyl-piperazine cis-22a as the first submicromolar TRPV6 inhibitor. This inhibitor showed a seven-fold selectivity against the closely related calcium channel TRPV5 and no activity on store-operated calcium channels (SOC), but very significant off-target effects and low microsomal stability. Here, we surveyed analogues incorporating structural features of the natural product capsaicin and identified 3OG, a new oxygenated analog with similar potency against TRPV6 (IC50 = 0.082 ± 0.004 μM) and ion channel selectivity, but with high microsomal stability and very low off-target effects. This natural product-inspired inhibitor does not exhibit any non-specific toxicity effects on various cell lines and is proposed as a new tool compound to test pharmacological inhibition of TRPV6 mediated calcium flux in disease models. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33479695 PMCID: PMC7513592 DOI: 10.1039/d0md00145g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Med Chem ISSN: 2632-8682
Fig. 1Chemical structure and hTRPV6 inhibition potency of cis-22a (1), capsaicin (2), and the photoswitchable inhibitor 3 (shown as observed in X-ray structures).17–19
Scheme 1Synthesis of TRPV6 inhibitors and capsaicin analogues. Reagents and conditions. (a) TBDMSCl, DMAP, imidazole, DCM, r.t., 2 h (quant.); (b) (i) tert-butyl piperazine-1-carboxylate, AcOH, NaBH(OAc)3, DCE, r.t., 48 h; (ii) TFA, DCM, r.t., 1 h (78–45%, over 2-steps); (c) 4-R-cyclohexanones, NaBH(OAc)3, Et3N, DCE, r.t., 48 h (6–45%); (d) TBAF, THF, r.t., 3 h (30–59%, over 2-steps); (e) (i) tert-butyl piperazine-1-carboxylate, EDCl, DMAP, CH2Cl2, r.t., on; (ii) TFA, DCM, r.t., 1 h, (60%, over 2-steps); (f) 4-phenylcyclohexyl-piperazine, AcOH, NaBH(OAc)3, DCE, r.t., 48 h (6–68%); (g) (i) 1-benzylpiperazine, NaBH(OAc)3, DCE, r.t., 48 h; (ii) Pd/C, H2, AcOH, MeOH, r.t., on. (18–38%, over 2-steps); (h) 38, 15, AcOH, NaBH(OAc)3, DCE, r.t., 48 h (81%); (i) Mg, THF, Ar., r.t. to rf., 30 min; then 1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-8-one, THF, Ar., r.t. to rf., 30 min; (j) PPTS, acetone, H2O, 60 °C, 6 h (72–90%); (k) 37, 15, NaBH3CN, Et3N, MeOH, r.t., 24 h (48%); (l) hexyl- or octyl-sulfonyl-hydrazide, MeOH, r.t., 2 h (56–73%).
Fig. 2X-ray structures of compounds 1 (free base), 9 and 31 (di-HCl salts), and 19 and 40 (mono-HCl salts).
Fig. 3Dose–response curves of 1 (A) and 2 (B) in HEK-hTRPV6 cells, measuring Cd2+ influx.
Fig. 4Activity screening for hTRPV6 mediated Cd2+ uptake in HEK-hTRPV6 cells. Data shown are mean + SEM (n = 3).
Activity on hTRPV6
| Cpd | IC50 (μM) (95% CI) | HAC | LE | LLE |
|
| 0.050 ± 0.003 | 25 | 0.40 | 1.7 |
|
| 2.4 (1.4–4.2) | 26 | 0.30 | 0.3 |
|
| 1.6 (1.1–2.3) | 28 | 0.28 | 0.9 |
|
| 2.1 (1.5–2.9) | 27 | 0.29 | 1.0 |
|
| 0.43 (0.31–0.59) | 29 | 0.30 | 2.1 |
|
| 2.4 (0.30–19.0) | 24 | 0.32 | 2.1 |
|
| 0.37 (0.25–0.57) | 26 | 0.34 | 3.5 |
|
| 0.60 (0.45–0.80) | 27 | 0.32 | 3.9 |
|
| 0.55 (0.35–0.87) | 25 | 0.34 | 2.0 |
|
| 0.55 (0.40–0.77) | 27 | 0.32 | 1.3 |
|
| 0.17 (0.14–0.22) | 26 | 0.36 | 1.6 |
|
| 0.15 ± 0.04 | 27 | 0.35 | 3.2 |
|
| 0.064 ± 0.007 | 30 | 0.33 | 3.2 |
|
| 0.69 ± 0.18 | 30 | 0.28 | 2.2 |
|
| 0.082 ± 0.004 | 31 | 0.31 | 4.8 |
|
| 0.13 ± 0.03 | 31 | 0.30 | 4.6 |
Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 9/concentration) for at least 2 independent experiments or mean and 95% confidence interval (n = 6/concentration) of a single experiment.
HAC: heavy atom count.
LE: ligand efficiency = (1.37 × pIC50)/HAC, where pIC50 = –log(IC50) in the molar range.34
LLE: lipophilic ligand efficiency = pIC50 – clog P, where clog P was obtained from ChemDraw v. 19.0.1.28 (PerkinElmer Informatics, Inc.).34
Fig. 5Evaluation of 39 (3OG) as a TRPV6 inhibitor. (A) Dose–response curve of 39 on Cd2+ influx into HEK-hTRPV6 cells. Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 6/concentration) of 4 independent experiments. (B) and (C) Electrophysiological characterisation of 39. (B) Averaged time course of whole-cell current densities (mean ± SEM) from YFP-TRPV6 transfected HEK293 cells. The experiment started at 10 mM Ca2+, subsequently containing equivalent amounts of DMSO as the control (green) or 0.1 and 10 μM 39 (blue) or 1 (black), followed by La3+. (C) Bar graph (mean ± SEM and individual values) of inhibition by 0.1 and 10 μM 39 (blue) and 1 (black) on TRPV6 current densities. * indicates significant p values < 0.05.
Fig. 6HEK-hTRPV6 cells co-stained with Leadmium™ Green and wheat germ agglutinin Alexa Fluor™ 594 conjugate. Images were collected at time 0 min and 30 min after treatment with the vehicle (A) or 10 μM 39 (B) followed by the addition of Cd2+ (50 μM) using confocal microscopy (Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E, 100×). White bars denote 25 μm scale.
Fig. 7IC50 values of Cd2+ toxicity to HEK293 wt and HEK-hTRPV6 cells. Data shown are mean + SEM (n = 4/concentration) of 2 independent experiments. ****P < 0.0001; n.s., P > 0.05.
Fig. 8In vitro polypharmacology for selected targets of 1 (blue diamonds) and 39 (red diamonds). Data are shown for each replicate (n = 2). The data for 1 were extracted from ref. 17. The experiments were conducted by Eurofins Cerep SA, France.
Fig. 9A. Recording of store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) in MDA-MB-231 cells pretreated for 20 min with either DMSO or SOCE inhibitor GSK-7975A, or 1vs.39. Ca2+ store-depletion was achieved by 10 min treatment of cells with 1 μM thapsigargin (Tg) in a nominally Ca2+ free buffer. B. SOCE quantification as the area under the curve (AUC) of the 2 mM CaCl2 (Ca2+) add-back trace is shown as normalized values to the DMSO control (mean ± SD; n = 18). The P-value of the 1vs.39 pretreated cells is indicated above the respective bar as *** for p ≤ 0.001 or non-significant (n.s.) for p > 0.05.
Fig. 10Dose–response curves of 1 (A) and 39 (B) in different breast and ovarian cancer cells and HEK293. Relative cell survival compared to the DMSO control is shown as a function of inhibitor concentration. Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 8/concentration) of 3 independent experiments.
Fig. 11Overview of TRPV6 inhibitor development. The interactive version of the map is accessible at http://tm.gdb.tools/trpv6-inhibitors/. For color-coding, IC50 values were used as reported, or estimated from reported percentage inhibition at 5 μM or 10 μM. Inactive compounds were assigned IC50 = 1 mM. Compound numbers in parentheses are from ref. 17. The map was prepared using the public website and instructions at ; https://try-tmap.gdb.tools/.