Literature DB >> 33479130

Disgraced COVID-19 studies are still routinely cited.

Charles Piller.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID： 33479130     DOI： 10.1126/science.371.6527.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  On zombies, struldbrugs, and other horrors of the scientific literature.

Authors:  May R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Automated production of research data marts from a canonical fast healthcare interoperability resource data repository: applications to COVID-19 research.

Authors:  Leslie A Lenert; Andrey V Ilatovskiy; James Agnew; Patricia Rudisill; Jeff Jacobs; Duncan Weatherston; Kenneth R Deans
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Scite.

Authors:  Stacy Brody
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-10-01

4.  COVID-19 article retractions in journals indexed in PubMed.

Authors:  Christopher J Peterson; Robert Alexander; Kenneth Nugent
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.462

5.  Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report.

Authors:  Jodi Schneider; Nathan D Woods; Randi Proescholdt
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2022-09-19

6.  Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine.

Authors:  Tzu-Kun Hsiao; Jodi Schneider
Journal:  Quant Sci Stud       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Top 50 cited articles on Covid-19 after the first year of the pandemic: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Srinivas B S Kambhampati; Nagashree Vasudeva; Raju Vaishya; Mohit Kumar Patralekh
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-05-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.