Literature DB >> 33478257

The Impact of Exogenous Insulin Input on Calculating Hepatic Clearance Parameters.

Alexander D McHugh1, J Geoffrey Chase1, Jennifer L Knopp1, Jennifer J Ormsbee1, Diana G Kulawiec2, Troy L Merry3,4, Rinki Murphy3, Peter R Shepherd3, Hannah J Burden3, Paul D Docherty1,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Model-based metabolic tests require accurate identification of subject-specific parameters from measured assays. Insulin assays are used to identify insulin kinetics parameters, such as general and first-pass hepatic clearances. This study assesses the impact of intravenous insulin boluses on parameter identification precision.
METHOD: Insulin and C-peptide data from two intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) trials of healthy adults (N = 10 × 2; denoted A and B), with (A) and without (B) insulin modification, were used to identify insulin kinetics parameters using a grid search. Monte Carlo analysis (N = 1000) quantifies variation in simulation error for insulin assay errors of 5%. A region of parameter values around the optimum was identified whose errors are within variation due to assay error. A smaller optimal region indicates more precise practical identifiability. Trial results were compared to assess identifiability and precision.
RESULTS: Trial B, without insulin modification, has optimal parameter regions 4.7 times larger on average than Trial A, with 1-U insulin bolus modification. Ranges of optimal parameter values between trials A and B increase from 0.04 to 0.12 min-1 for hepatic clearance and from 0.07 to 0.14 for first-pass clearance on average. Trial B's optimal values frequently lie outside physiological ranges, further indicating lack of distinct identifiability.
CONCLUSIONS: A small 1-U insulin bolus improves identification of hepatic clearance parameters by providing a smaller region of optimal parameter values. Adding an insulin bolus in metabolic tests can significantly improve identifiability and outcome test precision. Assay errors necessitate insulin modification in clinical tests to ensure identifiability and precision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVGTT; assay error; hepatic clearance; identification; identification error; insulin kinetics; insulin modified

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33478257      PMCID: PMC9264438          DOI: 10.1177/1932296820986878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  42 in total

1.  Minimal model S(I)=0 problem in NIDDM subjects: nonzero Bayesian estimates with credible confidence intervals.

Authors:  Gianluigi Pillonetto; Giovanni Sparacino; Paolo Magni; Riccardo Bellazzi; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Roman Hovorka; Valentina Canonico; Ludovic J Chassin; Ulrich Haueter; Massimo Massi-Benedetti; Marco Orsini Federici; Thomas R Pieber; Helga C Schaller; Lukas Schaupp; Thomas Vering; Malgorzata E Wilinska
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  DAISY: a new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems.

Authors:  Giuseppina Bellu; Maria Pia Saccomani; Stefania Audoly; Leontina D'Angiò
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Evolution of insulin sensitivity and its variability in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated with hypothermia.

Authors:  Azurahisham Sah Pri; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jean-Louis Vincent; Mauro Oddo; Fabio S Taccone; Sophie Penning; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Design and clinical pilot testing of the model-based dynamic insulin sensitivity and secretion test (DISST).

Authors:  Thomas F Lotz; J Geoffrey Chase; Kirsten A McAuley; Geoffrey M Shaw; Paul D Docherty; Juliet E Berkeley; Sheila M Williams; Christopher E Hann; Jim I Mann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

6.  Modified protocols improve insulin sensitivity estimation using the minimal model.

Authors:  Y J Yang; J H Youn; R N Bergman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1987-12

7.  Splanchnic and renal metabolism of insulin in human subjects: a dose-response study.

Authors:  E Ferrannini; J Wahren; O K Faber; P Felig; C Binder; R A DeFronzo
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-06

8.  Monte Carlo analysis of a new model-based method for insulin sensitivity testing.

Authors:  Thomas F Lotz; J Geoffrey Chase; Kirsten A McAuley; Geoffrey M Shaw; Xing-Wei Wong; Jessica Lin; Aaron Lecompte; Christopher E Hann; Jim I Mann
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Safety of outpatient closed-loop control: first randomized crossover trials of a wearable artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Eric Renard; Claudio Cobelli; Howard C Zisser; Patrick Keith-Hynes; Stacey M Anderson; Sue A Brown; Daniel R Chernavvsky; Marc D Breton; Lloyd B Mize; Anne Farret; Jérôme Place; Daniela Bruttomesso; Simone Del Favero; Federico Boscari; Silvia Galasso; Angelo Avogaro; Lalo Magni; Federico Di Palma; Chiara Toffanin; Mirko Messori; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Safety, efficacy and clinical generalization of the STAR protocol: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kent W Stewart; Christopher G Pretty; Hamish Tomlinson; Felicity L Thomas; József Homlok; Szabó Némedi Noémi; Attila Illyés; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balázs Benyó; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.