Literature DB >> 33478033

When, How, and to What Extent Are Individuals with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome Able to Progress? Neurobehavioral Progress.

Enrique Noé1, Joan Ferri1, José Olaya1, María Dolores Navarro1, Myrtha O'Valle1, Carolina Colomer1, Belén Moliner1, Camilla Ippoliti1, Anny Maza2, Roberto Llorens1,2.   

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the neurobehavioral progress of patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) is essential to anticipate their most likely clinical course and guide clinical decision making. Although different studies have described this progress and possible predictors of neurobehavioral improvement in these patients, they have methodological limitations that could restrict the validity and generalization of the results. This study investigates the neurobehavioral progress of 100 patients with UWS consecutively admitted to a neurorehabilitation center using systematic weekly assessments based on standardized measures, and the prognostic factors of changes in their neurobehavioral condition. Our results showed that, during the analyzed period, 34% of the patients were able to progress from UWS to minimally conscious state (MCS), 12% of the total sample (near one third from those who progressed to MCS) were able to emerge from MCS, and 10% of the patients died. Transition to MCS was mostly denoted by visual signs, which appeared either alone or in combination with motor signs, and was predicted by etiology and the score on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised at admission with an accuracy of 75%. Emergence from MCS was denoted in the same proportion by functional communication and object use. Predictive models of emergence from MCS and mortality were not valid and the identified predictors could not be accounted for.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain damage; disorders of consciousness; minimally conscious state; mortality; predictors; recovery; unresponsive wakefulness syndrome; vegetative state

Year:  2021        PMID: 33478033      PMCID: PMC7835897          DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Sci        ISSN: 2076-3425


  55 in total

1.  Late recovery from permanent traumatic vegetative state heralded by event-related potentials.

Authors:  S Faran; J J Vatine; A Lazary; A Ohry; N Birbaumer; B Kotchoubey
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  The Spanish version of the Coma Recovery Scale-revised: Events on a correct timeline.

Authors:  Joan Ferri; Enrique Noé; Roberto Lloréns
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Disorders of Consciousness: Ethical Issues of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostication.

Authors:  Spencer Septien; Michael A Rubin
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.420

4.  Functional isolation within the cerebral cortex in the vegetative state: a nonlinear method to predict clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Marco Sarà; Francesca Pistoia; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Fabio Sebastiano; Paolo Onorati; Paolo M Rossini
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Mortality following Traumatic Brain Injury among Individuals Unable to Follow Commands at the Time of Rehabilitation Admission: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study.

Authors:  Brian D Greenwald; Flora M Hammond; Cynthia Harrison-Felix; Risa Nakase-Richardson; Laura L S Howe; Scott Kreider
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Further recovery in a potential treatment withdrawal case 10 years after brain injury.

Authors:  T M McMillan; C M Herbert
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Score on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised at admission predicts outcome at discharge in intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury.

Authors:  Emilio Portaccio; Azzurra Morrocchesi; Anna Maria Romoli; Bahia Hakiki; Maria Pia Taglioli; Elena Lippi; Martina Di Renzone; Antonello Grippo; Claudio Macchi
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Neurobehavioral recovery in patients who emerged from prolonged disorder of consciousness: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hoo Young Lee; Jung Hyun Park; Ae Ryoung Kim; Misun Park; Tae-Woo Kim
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 9.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons; Danielle A van der Windt; Jill A Hayden; Pablo Perel; Sara Schroter; Richard D Riley; Harry Hemingway; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Early discrimination of cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness: pitfalls and clues.

Authors:  Alessandro Pincherle; Frederic Rossi; Jane Jöhr; Vincent Dunet; Philippe Ryvlin; Mauro Oddo; Nicolas Schiff; Karin Diserens
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  1 in total

1.  The neuroethics of disorders of consciousness: a brief history of evolving ideas.

Authors:  Michael J Young; Yelena G Bodien; Joseph T Giacino; Joseph J Fins; Robert D Truog; Leigh R Hochberg; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 13.501

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.