Literature DB >> 33478012

Changes in Cartilage Thickness and Denuded Bone Area after Knee Joint Distraction and High Tibial Osteotomy-Post-Hoc Analyses of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

Mylène P Jansen1, Susanne Maschek2,3, Ronald J van Heerwaarden4, Simon C Mastbergen1, Wolfgang Wirth2,3, Floris P J G Lafeber1, Felix Eckstein2,3.   

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) and knee joint distraction (KJD) are joint-preserving treatments that unload the more affected compartment (MAC) in knee osteoarthritis. This post-hoc study compares two-year cartilage-thickness changes after treatment with KJD vs. HTO, and identifies factors predicting cartilage restoration. Patients indicated for HTO were randomized to KJD (KJDHTO) or HTO treatment. Patients indicated for total knee arthroplasty received KJD (KJDTKA). Outcomes were the MRI mean MAC cartilage thickness and percentage of denuded bone area (dABp) change two years after treatment, using radiographic joint space width (JSW) as the reference. Cohen's d was used for between-group effect sizes. Post-treatment, KJDHTO patients (n = 18) did not show significant changes. HTO patients (n = 33) displayed a decrease in MAC cartilage thickness and an increase in dABp, but an increase in JSW. KJDTKA (n = 18) showed an increase in MAC cartilage thickness and JSW, and a decrease in dABp. Osteoarthritis severity was the strongest predictor of cartilage restoration. Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥3 showed significant restoration (p < 0.01) after KJD; grade ≤2 did not. Effect sizes between severe KJD and HTO patients were large for MAC MRI cartilage thickness (d = 1.09; p = 0.005) and dABp (d = 1.13; p = 0.003), but not radiographic JSW (d = 0.28; p = 0.521). This suggests that in knee osteoarthritis patients with high disease severity, KJD may be more efficient in restoring cartilage thickness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; cartilage; high tibial osteotomy; joint-preserving; knee joint distraction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33478012      PMCID: PMC7835945          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  38 in total

1.  Five-Year Follow-up of Knee Joint Distraction: Clinical Benefit and Cartilaginous Tissue Repair in an Open Uncontrolled Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jan-Ton A D van der Woude; Karen Wiegant; Peter M van Roermund; Femke Intema; Roel J H Custers; Felix Eckstein; Jaap M van Laar; Simon C Mastbergen; Floris P J G Lafeber
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Survivorship of high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: Finnish registry-based study of 3195 knees.

Authors:  T T Niinimäki; A Eskelinen; B S Mann; M Junnila; P Ohtonen; J Leppilahti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-11

Review 3.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Past, Current Controversies, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Sim Johal; Naoki Nakano; Mark Baxter; Ihab Hujazi; Hemant Pandit; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee.

Authors:  Robert J Buck; Bradley T Wyman; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Wolfgang Wirth; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Osteoarthritis may not be a one-way-road of cartilage loss--comparison of spatial patterns of cartilage change between osteoarthritic and healthy knees.

Authors:  R J Buck; B T Wyman; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; M Hudelmaier; W Wirth; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Anthony D Woolf; Bruce Pfleger
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lee E Bayliss; David Culliford; A Paul Monk; Sion Glyn-Jones; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Andrew Judge; Cyrus Cooper; Andrew J Carr; Nigel K Arden; David J Beard; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Knee Joint Distraction as Treatment for Osteoarthritis Results in Clinical and Structural Benefit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Limited Number of Studies and Patients Available.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Tim A E J Boymans; Roel J H Custers; Rutger C I Van Geenen; Ronald J Van Heerwaarden; Maarten R Huizinga; Jorm M Nellensteijn; Rob Sollie; Sander Spruijt; Simon C Mastbergen
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Role of High Tibial Osteotomy in Cartilage Regeneration - Is Correction of Malalignment Mandatory for Success?

Authors:  Matthew Dhanaraj Thambiah; Melvin K L Tan; James H P Hui
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Knee joint distraction in regular care for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A comparison with clinical trial data.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Simon C Mastbergen; Ronald J van Heerwaarden; Sander Spruijt; Michelle D van Empelen; Esmee C Kester; Floris P J G Lafeber; Roel J H Custers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of joint distraction in osteoarthritis of the knee: Basic science, principles and outcomes.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; João Pedro Campos; Raghbir S Khakha; Adrian J Wilson; Ronald J van Heerwaarden
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 2.  Joint distraction for osteoarthritis: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Simon C Mastbergen
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  Osteoarthritis Pathophysiology: Therapeutic Target Discovery may Require a Multifaceted Approach.

Authors:  Tonia L Vincent; Tamara Alliston; Mohit Kapoor; Richard F Loeser; Linda Troeberg; Christopher B Little
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.529

4.  Comparison between 2D radiographic weight-bearing joint space width and 3D MRI non-weight-bearing cartilage thickness measures in the knee using non-weight-bearing 2D and 3D CT as an intermediary.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Simon C Mastbergen; Felix Eckstein; Ronald J van Heerwaarden; Sander Spruijt; Floris P J G Lafeber
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Knee joint distraction results in MRI cartilage thickness increase up to 10 years after treatment.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Simon C Mastbergen; James W MacKay; Tom D Turmezei; Floris Lafeber
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 7.046

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.