| Literature DB >> 33477929 |
Esther Oceja1, Paula Rodríguez2, María José Jurado3, Maria Luz Alonso4, Genoveva Del Río5, María Ángeles Villar6, Olga Mediano7, Marian Martínez8, Santiago Juarros9, Milagros Merino10, Jaime Corral11, Carmen Luna12, Leila Kheirandish-Gozal13, David Gozal13, Joaquín Durán-Cantolla2.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children is a prevalent, albeit largely undiagnosed disease associated with a large spectrum of morbidities. Overnight in-lab polysomnography remains the gold standard diagnostic approach, but is time-consuming, inconvenient, and expensive, and not readily available in many places. Simplified Home Respiratory Polygraphy (HRP) approaches have been proposed to reduce costs and facilitate the diagnostic process. However, evidence supporting the validity of HRP is still scarce, hampering its implementation in routine clinical use. The objectives were: Primary; to establish the diagnostic and therapeutic decision validity of a simplified HRP approach compared to PSG among children at risk of OSA. Secondary: (a) Analyze the cost-effectiveness of the HRP versus in-lab PSG in evaluation and treatment of pediatric OSA; (b) Evaluate the impact of therapeutic interventions based on HRP versus PSG findings six months after treatment using sleep and health parameters and quality of life instruments; (c) Discovery and validity of the urine biomarkers to establish the diagnosis of OSA and changes after treatment.Entities:
Keywords: children; cost-effectiveness analysis; diagnosis; obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); respiratory polygraphy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33477929 PMCID: PMC7838960 DOI: 10.3390/mps4010009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Methods Protoc ISSN: 2409-9279