Literature DB >> 33477874

Assessing the Role of Pericardial Fat as a Biomarker Connected to Coronary Calcification-A Deep Learning Based Approach Using Fully Automated Body Composition Analysis.

Lennard Kroll1,2, Kai Nassenstein1,3, Markus Jochims4, Sven Koitka1,2, Felix Nensa1,2.   

Abstract

(1) Background: Epi- and Paracardial Adipose Tissue (EAT, PAT) have been spotlighted as important biomarkers in cardiological assessment in recent years. Since biomarker quantification is an increasingly important method for clinical use, we wanted to examine fully automated EAT and PAT quantification for possible use in cardiovascular risk stratification. (2)
Methods: 966 patients with intermediate Framingham risk scores for Coronary Artery Disease referred for coronary calcium scans were included in clinical routine retrospectively. The Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CACS) was extracted and tissue quantification was performed by a deep learning network. (3)
Results: The Computed Tomography (CT) segmentations predicted by the network indicated no significant correlation between EAT volume and EAT radiodensity when compared to Agatston score (r = 0.18, r = -0.09). CACS 0 category patients showed significantly lower levels of total EAT and PAT volumes and higher EAT and PAT densities than CACS 1-99 category patients (p < 0.01). Notably, this difference did not reach significance regarding EAT attenuation in male patients. Women older than 50 years, thus more likely to be postmenopausal, were shown to be at higher risk of coronary calcification (p < 0.01, OR = 4.59). CACS 1-99 vs. CACS ≥100 category patients remained below significance level (EAT volume: p = 0.087, EAT attenuation: p = 0.98). (4) Conclusions: Our study proves the feasibility of a fully automated adipose tissue analysis in clinical cardiac CT and confirms in a large clinical cohort that volume and attenuation of EAT and PAT are not correlated with CACS. Broadly available deep learning based rapid and reliable tissue quantification should thus be discussed as a method to assess this biomarker as a supplementary risk predictor in cardiac CT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; atherosclerosis; body composition analysis; deep learning; epicardial adipose tissue; paracardial adipose tissue

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477874      PMCID: PMC7832906          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  32 in total

Review 1.  Epicardial adipose tissue: anatomic, biomolecular and clinical relationships with the heart.

Authors:  Gianluca Iacobellis; Domenico Corradi; Arya M Sharma
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-10

2.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Cardiovascular Fat, Menopause, and Sex Hormones in Women: The SWAN Cardiovascular Fat Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Samar R El Khoudary; Kelly J Shields; Imke Janssen; Carrie Hanley; Matthew J Budoff; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Susan A Everson-Rose; Lynda H Powell; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Epicardial adipose tissue volume assessed by computed tomography and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Mancio; Diana Azevedo; Francisca Saraiva; Ana Isabel Azevedo; Gustavo Pires-Morais; Adelino Leite-Moreira; Ines Falcao-Pires; Nuno Lunet; Nuno Bettencourt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Laurie LaBree; Stanley P Azen; Terence M Doherty; Robert C Detrano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Epicardial and paracardial adipose tissue volume and attenuation - Association with high-risk coronary plaque on computed tomographic angiography in the ROMICAT II trial.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Jakob Park; Khristine Ghemigian; Thomas Mayrhofer; Stefan B Puchner; Ting Liu; Jerome L Fleg; James E Udelson; Quynh A Truong; Maros Ferencik; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.162

7.  Association of epicardial adipose tissue and left atrial size on non-contrast CT with atrial fibrillation: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study.

Authors:  Amir A Mahabadi; Nils Lehmann; Hagen Kälsch; Marcus Bauer; Iryna Dykun; Kaffer Kara; Susanne Moebus; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Möhlenkamp
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Measurement of skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and basis of its biological variation.

Authors:  J Aubrey; N Esfandiari; V E Baracos; F A Buteau; J Frenette; C T Putman; V C Mazurak
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.311

Review 10.  Epicardial fat: definition, measurements and systematic review of main outcomes.

Authors:  Angela Gallina Bertaso; Daniela Bertol; Bruce Bartholow Duncan; Murilo Foppa
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.000

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Epicardial and pericardial fat analysis on CT images and artificial intelligence: a literature review.

Authors:  Federico Greco; Rodrigo Salgado; Wim Van Hecke; Romualdo Del Buono; Paul M Parizel; Carlo Augusto Mallio
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Machine learning applications in cardiac computed tomography: a composite systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan James Hyett Bray; Moghees Ahmad Hanif; Mohammad Alradhawi; Jacob Ibbetson; Surinder Singh Dosanjh; Sabrina Lucy Smith; Mahmood Ahmad; Dominic Pimenta
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2022-03-17

3.  Macrophage Polarization in the Perivascular Fat Was Associated With Coronary Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Daniela Souza Farias-Itao; Carlos Augusto Pasqualucci; Renato Araújo de Andrade; Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva; Maristella Yahagi-Estevam; Silvia Helena Gelas Lage; Renata Elaine Paraízo Leite; Alexandre Brincalepe Campo; Claudia Kimie Suemoto
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.106

4.  CT-derived body composition analysis could possibly replace DXA and BIA to monitor NET-patients.

Authors:  Lennard Kroll; Annie Mathew; Felix Nensa; Harald Lahner; Giulia Baldini; René Hosch; Sven Koitka; Jens Kleesiek; Christoph Rischpler; Johannes Haubold; Dagmar Fuhrer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Biomarkers extracted by fully automated body composition analysis from chest CT correlate with SARS-CoV-2 outcome severity.

Authors:  René Hosch; Simone Kattner; Marc Moritz Berger; Thorsten Brenner; Johannes Haubold; Jens Kleesiek; Sven Koitka; Lennard Kroll; Anisa Kureishi; Nils Flaschel; Felix Nensa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.