Literature DB >> 33477532

Impella CP Implantation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Experience.

Vassili Panagides1,2,3, Henrik Vase4, Sachin P Shah5, Mir B Basir6, Julien Mancini7, Hayaan Kamran5, Supria Batra5, Marc Laine1,2,3, Hans Eiskjær4, Steffen Christensen8, Mina Karami9, Franck Paganelli1,2,3, Jose P S Henriques9, Laurent Bonello1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impella CP is a left ventricular pump which may serve as a circulatory support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest (CA). Nevertheless, the survival rate and factors associated with survival in patients undergoing Impella insertion during CPR for CA are unknown.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter international registry of patients undergoing Impella insertion during on-going CPR for in- or out-of-hospital CA. We recorded immediate and 30-day survival with and without neurologic impairment using the cerebral performance category score and evaluated the factors associated with survival.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had an Impella CP implanted during CPR for CA. Refractory ventricular arrhythmias were the most frequent initial rhythm (65.7%). In total, 65.7% of patients immediately survived. At 30 days, 45.7% of patients were still alive. The 30-day survival rate without neurological impairment was 37.1%. In univariate analysis, survival was associated with both an age < 75 years and a time from arrest to CPR ≤ 5 min (p = 0.035 and p = 0.008, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In our multicenter registry, Impella CP insertion during ongoing CPR for CA was associated with a 37.1% rate of 30-day survival without neurological impairment. The factors associated with survival were a young age and a time from arrest to CPR ≤ 5 min.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impella; cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; hemodynamic support device; refractory cardiac arrest

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477532      PMCID: PMC7831079          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  30 in total

1.  No change in survival after cardiac arrest in 2007 and 2012 at a hospital in Denmark.

Authors:  Lisbeth Holmgaard Quitzau; Henriette Ullerup-Aagaard; Mikkel Brabrand
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 2.  In-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, prognosis and possible measures to improve survival.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Jerry Nolan; Fabio Cavallaro; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Cardiac Arrest in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Combining Mechanical Chest Compressions and Percutaneous LV Assistance.

Authors:  Kapildeo Lotun; Huu Tam Truong; Kyoung-Chul Cha; Hanan Alsakka; Renan Gianotto-Oliveira; Nicole Smith; Prashant Rao; Tyler Bien; Shaun Chatelain; Matthew C Kern; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Mathias Zuercher; Karl B Kern
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 4.  Prognostic factors for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation recipients following out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Debaty; Valentin Babaz; Michel Durand; Lucie Gaide-Chevronnay; Emmanuel Fournel; Marc Blancher; Hélène Bouvaist; Olivier Chavanon; Maxime Maignan; Pierre Bouzat; Pierre Albaladejo; José Labarère
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  ExtraCorporeal Life support for refractory cardiogenic shock: "An efficient system support of peripheral organs more than real ventricular assist device…".

Authors:  Alexandre Ouattara; Alain Rémy; Astrid Quessard
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Demetris Yannopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Ganesh Raveendran; Marc Conterato; Ralph J Frascone; Alexander Trembley; Ranjit John; John Connett; David G Benditt; Keith G Lurie; Robert F Wilson; Tom P Aufderheide
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Left ventricular mechanical support with Impella provides more ventricular unloading in heart failure than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Dai Kawashima; Satoshi Gojo; Takashi Nishimura; Yoshihumi Itoda; Kazuo Kitahori; Noboru Motomura; Tetsuro Morota; Arata Murakami; Shinichi Takamoto; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Cardiac Arrest in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Concept of Circulatory Support With Mechanical Chest Compression and Impella to Facilitate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Kaleab N Asrress; Maciej Marciniak; Natalia Briceno; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.975

9.  Impella use in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: Analysis of 10 years registry data.

Authors:  Cedric Davidsen; Erik J S Packer; Kjetil H Løland; Svein Rotevatn; Else L Nygreen; Erlend Eriksen; Anja Øksnes; Jon Herstad; Rune Haaverstad; Øyvind Bleie; Vegard Tuseth
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 10.  Guidelines for indications for the use of extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiac arrest. French Ministry of Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  2009-02-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Percutaneous Coil Embolization of Coronary Artery Fistula Complicated by Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Ahmad Akhtar; Malcolm T Foster; Yasir Akhtar
Journal:  JACC Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.