| Literature DB >> 33477285 |
Stan Benjamens1,2, Saleh Z Alghamdi1, Elsaline Rijkse3, Charlotte A Te Velde-Keyzer4, Stefan P Berger4, Cyril Moers1, Martin H de Borst4, Riemer H J A Slart2,5, Frank J M F Dor6,7, Robert C Minnee3, Robert A Pol1.
Abstract
While the association of vascular calcification with inferior patient outcomes in kidney transplant recipients is well-established, the association with graft outcomes has received less attention. With this dual-centre cohort study, we aimed to determine the clinical impact of recipient pre-transplant aorto-iliac calcification, measured on non-contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT)-imaging within three years prior to transplantation (2005-2018). We included 547 patients (61.4% male, age 60 (interquartile range 51-68) years), with a median follow-up of 3.1 (1.4-5.2) years after transplantation. The aorto-iliac calcification score (CaScore) was inversely associated with one-year estimated-glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in univariate linear regression analysis (standard β -3.3 (95% CI -5.1 to -1.5, p < 0.0001), but not after adjustment for potential confounders, including donor and recipient age (p = 0.077). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, a high CaScore was associated with overall graft failure (p = 0.004) and death with a functioning graft (p = 0.002), but not with death-censored graft failure and graft function decline. This study demonstrated that pre-transplant aorto-iliac calcification is associated with one-year eGFR in univariate, but not in multivariable linear regression analyses. Moreover, this study underlines that transplantation in patients with a high CaScore does not result in earlier transplant function decline or worse death censored graft survival, although ongoing efforts for the prevention of death with a functioning graft remain essential.Entities:
Keywords: aorta; graft failure; graft function; graft function decline; iliac artery; kidney transplantation; vascular calcification
Year: 2021 PMID: 33477285 PMCID: PMC7829792 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241