Literature DB >> 33477118

Exosome isolation using nanostructures and microfluidic devices.

Minh-Chau N Le1, Z Hugh Fan1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Exosomes contain cargoes of proteins, lipids, micro-ribonucleic acids, and functional messenger RNAs, and they play a key role in cell-to-cell communication and hold valuable information about biological processes such as disease pathology. To harvest their potentials in disease diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics, exosome isolation is a crucial first step in providing pure and intact samples for both research and clinical purposes. Unfortunately, conventional methods for exosome separation suffer from low purity, low capture efficiency, long processing time, large sample volume requirement, the need for dedicated equipment and trained personnel, and high cost. In the last decade, microfluidic devices, especially those that incorporate nanostructures, have emerged as superior alternatives for exosome isolation and detection. In this review, we examine microfluidic platforms, dividing them into six categories based on their capture mechanisms: passive-structure-based affinity, immunomagnetic-based affinity, filtration, acoustofluidics, electrokinetics, and optofluidics. Here, we start out exploring the research and clinical needs that translate into important performance parameters for new exosome isolation designs. Then, we briefly introduce the conventional methods and discuss how their failure to meet those performance standards sparks an intense interest in microfluidic device innovations. The essence of this review is to lead an in-depth discussion on not only the technicality of those microfluidic platforms, but also their strengths and weaknesses with regards to the performance parameters set forth. To close the conversation, we call for the inclusion of exosome confirmation and contamination evaluation as part of future device development and performance assessment process, so that collectively, efforts towards microfluidics and nanotechnology for exosome isolation and analysis may soon see the light of real-world applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477118      PMCID: PMC8082697          DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/abde70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  60 in total

1.  Chaotic mixer for microchannels.

Authors:  Abraham D Stroock; Stephan K W Dertinger; Armand Ajdari; Igor Mezic; Howard A Stone; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Microfluidic affinity separation chip for selective capture and release of label-free ovarian cancer exosomes.

Authors:  Colin L Hisey; Kalpana Deepa Priya Dorayappan; David E Cohn; Karuppaiyah Selvendiran; Derek J Hansford
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes.

Authors:  Raghu Kalluri; Valerie S LeBleu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The Exosome Total Isolation Chip.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Ophir Vermesh; Vigneshwaran Mani; Tianjia J Ge; Steven J Madsen; Andrew Sabour; En-Chi Hsu; Gayatri Gowrishankar; Masamitsu Kanada; Jesse V Jokerst; Raymond G Sierra; Edwin Chang; Kenneth Lau; Kaushik Sridhar; Abel Bermudez; Sharon J Pitteri; Tanya Stoyanova; Robert Sinclair; Viswam S Nair; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  A Microfluidic Chip Enables Isolation of Exosomes and Establishment of Their Protein Profiles and Associated Signaling Pathways in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Kalpana Deepa Priya Dorayappan; Miranda L Gardner; Colin L Hisey; Roman A Zingarelli; Brentley Q Smith; Michelle D S Lightfoot; Rajan Gogna; Meghan M Flannery; John Hays; Derek J Hansford; Michael A Freitas; Lianbo Yu; David E Cohn; Karuppaiyah Selvendiran
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Nanoporous micro-element arrays for particle interception in microfluidic cell separation.

Authors:  Grace D Chen; Fabio Fachin; Elena Colombini; Brian L Wardle; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles.

Authors:  Chihchen Chen; Johan Skog; Chia-Hsien Hsu; Ryan T Lessard; Leonora Balaj; Thomas Wurdinger; Bob S Carter; Xandra O Breakefield; Mehmet Toner; Daniel Irimia
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Acoustic purification of extracellular microvesicles.

Authors:  Kyungheon Lee; Huilin Shao; Ralph Weissleder; Hakho Lee
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Isolation and Profiling of Circulating Tumor-Associated Exosomes Using Extracellular Vesicular Lipid-Protein Binding Affinity Based Microfluidic Device.

Authors:  Yoon-Tae Kang; Emma Purcell; Colin Palacios-Rolston; Ting-Wen Lo; Nithya Ramnath; Shruti Jolly; Sunitha Nagrath
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 13.281

10.  Acoustofluidic separation of cells and particles.

Authors:  Mengxi Wu; Adem Ozcelik; Joseph Rufo; Zeyu Wang; Rui Fang; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 7.127

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Research Development on Exosome Separation Technology.

Authors:  Wei-Ming Xu; Ao Li; Jia-Jun Chen; En-Jie Sun
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.426

2.  A Washing-Free and Easy-to-Operate Fluorescent Biosensor for Highly Efficient Detection of Breast Cancer-Derived Exosomes.

Authors:  Wenqin Chen; Yan Zhang; Kaili Di; Chang Liu; Yanyan Xia; Shijia Ding; Han Shen; Zhiyang Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.