Literature DB >> 3347658

Precision rhinoplasty. Part II: Prediction.

B Guyuron1.   

Abstract

This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the soft-tissue response rate to the skeletal and soft-tissue alterations following a rhinoplasty. Ninety-eight patients, 80 females and 18 males, with a mean follow-up of 13 months, were included in this study. The tracings of the outline of preoperative cephaloxerograms and life-size photographs were superimposed on the postoperative ones, and the differences were measured and confirmed with measurements of intraoperative resected segments. The soft-tissue response to skeletal alterations was measured in seven different zones. Zone 1 (nasion) and zone 7 (nasal spine area) had the lowest mean response rate of approximately 25 percent. Zone 2 (proximal bridge) and zone 3 (midbridge) had a 60 percent response rate. Zone 4 (supratip area) had a 43 percent response, zone 5 had a 41 percent response, and zone 6 had a 40 percent response rate. There were statistically significant differences among the response rates of thick, medium, and thin noses. Age was an important factor in zones 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7. The patient's sex did not influence the soft-tissue response rate to skeletal alterations. The soft-tissue response in relation to the alar base narrowing was about 52 percent. This study reveals a predictable soft-tissue response to skeletal alterations on all zones except zone 7 (nasal spine area).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3347658     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198804000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty.

Authors:  B Guyuron; R L Raszewski
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Art and science in aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  F Alkhairy
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Less is more: a conservative approach to male rhinoplasty.

Authors:  J F Ely
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty.

Authors:  B Guyuron; F Bokhari
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Rhinoplasty - indications and techniques.

Authors:  Abel-Jan Tasman
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

6.  Risks and complications in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Gerhard Rettinger
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

7.  Facial soft tissue changes after nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Cui-Ying Li; Jiu-Hui Jiang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Radix saw: a useful tool for rhinoplasty to correct high radix.

Authors:  Süreyya Şeneldir; Denizhan Dizdar; Altuğ Tuna
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.