Literature DB >> 33472810

Perioral petechiae and pulmonary haemorrhage, thinking outside the vacuum.

Gail Davison1,2, Andrew Given3, Clare Loughran3, Josip Marjanovic4, Elizabeth Dalzell2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  infant health; resuscitation; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33472810      PMCID: PMC7818812          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


× No keyword cloud information.

Description

A 3-month-old boy presented to the children’s emergency department with respiratory distress, haemoptysis, and perioral petechiae (figure 1). He was pale and floppy, with tachypnoea, hypoxia (SpO2 84%), bilateral crepitations, and wheeze. His white cell count was mildly elevated (20.5 ×109/L), and a chest X-ray (CXR) showed (figure 2) bilateral air-space opacification; a non-specific finding with differentials including oedema, infection, or haemorrhage.
Figure 1

A 3-month-old boy with circular petechiae around his mouth, caused by application of a domestic vacuum cleaner.

Figure 2

CXR of a 3-month-old showing diffuse bilateral air-space opacification, in-keeping pulmonary haemorrhage inflicted by perioral application of a domestic vacuum cleaner.

A 3-month-old boy with circular petechiae around his mouth, caused by application of a domestic vacuum cleaner. CXR of a 3-month-old showing diffuse bilateral air-space opacification, in-keeping pulmonary haemorrhage inflicted by perioral application of a domestic vacuum cleaner. His older brother subsequently admitted to holding a vacuum cleaner nozzle against his mouth, confirming the mechanism of injury and diagnosis of pulmonary haemorrhage. He required a short period of oxygen therapy and overnight admission. A thorough assessment revealed no social concerns and a repeat CXR 2 days later had improved. A MEDLINE keyword search was completed using the following terms: “(vacuum cleaner* or hoover* or household vacuum*) adj10 (injur* or h?emoptysis or h?emorrhage*)”. It revealed four relevant articles reporting 13 cases of vacuum cleaner inflicted hand burns in children and 2 auto-stimulation penile injuries in adolescents.1–4 There were no acute lung injuries reported. For most households, a domestic vacuum cleaner is an essential appliance frequently used by both parents and children and actively promoted as a comforter. To date, injuries have been relatively minor. We present the first case of severe and potentially life-threatening acute lung injury from this appliance. Paediatricians, manufacturers, and parents should be aware of the risk of vacuum cleaner inflicted pulmonary haemorrhage in young children. Manufacturers should display a child safety warning on vacuum appliances. Parents should keep vacuum appliances out of reach of children to reduce risk in the home.
  4 in total

1.  Hand injuries in young children from contact with vacuum cleaners.

Authors:  D Macgregor
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Paediatric friction hand injuries caused by domestic vacuum cleaners-a review from one unit.

Authors:  M Grob; I C Josty; M G Soldin; W A Dickson
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Vacuum cleaner injury to penis: a common urologic problem?

Authors:  R C Benson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Upper Extremity Friction Burns in the Pediatric Patient: A 10-year Review.

Authors:  Rachel Marchalik; Erin M Rada; Frank P Albino; Tina M Sauerhammer; Michael J Boyajian; Gary F Rogers; Albert K Oh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.