Literature DB >> 33472788

Effect of stroke early supported discharge on length of hospital stay: analysis from a national stroke registry.

Rebecca J Fisher1, Adrian Byrne2, Niki Chouliara2, Sarah Lewis3, Lizz Paley4, Alex Hoffman4, Anthony Rudd4, Thompson Robinson5, Peter Langhorne6, Marion Walker2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The first observational study to investigate the impact of early supported discharge (ESD) on length of hospital stay in real-world conditions.
DESIGN: Using historical prospective Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data (1 January 2013-31 December 2016) and multilevel modelling, cross-sectional (2015-2016; 30 791 patients nested within 55 hospitals) and repeated cross-sectional (2013-2014 vs 2015-2016; 49 266 patients nested within 41 hospitals) analyses were undertaken.
SETTING: Hospitals were sampled across a large geographical area of England covering the West and East Midlands, the East of England and the North of England. PARTICIPANTS: Stroke patients whose data were entered into the SSNAP database by hospital teams.
INTERVENTIONS: Receiving ESD along the patient care pathway. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: When adjusted for important case-mix variables, patients who received ESD on their stroke care pathway spent longer in hospital, compared with those who did not receive ESD. The percentage increase was 15.8% (95% CI 12.3% to 19.4%) for the 2015-2016 cross-sectional analysis and 18.8% (95% CI 13.9% to 24.0%) for the 2013-2014 versus 2015-2016 repeated cross-sectional analysis. On average, the increased length of hospital stay was approximately 1 day.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that by comparing ESD and non-ESD patient groups matched for important patient characteristics, receiving ESD resulted in a 1-day increase in length of hospital stay. The large reduction in length of hospital stay overall, since original trials were conducted, may explain why a reduction was not observed. The longer term benefits of accessing ESD need to be investigated further. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15568163. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health policy; rehabilitation medicine; stroke; stroke medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33472788      PMCID: PMC7818805          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  20 in total

1.  Is Stroke Early Supported Discharge still effective in practice? A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Rebecca J Fisher; Christine S Cobley; Iskra Potgieter; Amy Moody; Fiona Nouri; Catherine Gaynor; Adrian Byrne; Marion F Walker
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 2.  Recommendations for the Establishment of Stroke Systems of Care: A 2019 Update.

Authors:  Opeolu Adeoye; Karin V Nyström; Dileep R Yavagal; Jean Luciano; Raul G Nogueira; Richard D Zorowitz; Alexander A Khalessi; Cheryl Bushnell; William G Barsan; Peter Panagos; Mark J Alberts; A Colby Tiner; Lee H Schwamm; Edward C Jauch
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  A qualitative study exploring patients' and carers' experiences of Early Supported Discharge services after stroke.

Authors:  Christine S Cobley; Rebecca J Fisher; Niki Chouliara; Micky Kerr; Marion F Walker
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.477

4.  Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015.

Authors:  Debbie Hebert; M Patrice Lindsay; Amanda McIntyre; Adam Kirton; Peter G Rumney; Stephen Bagg; Mark Bayley; Dar Dowlatshahi; Sean Dukelow; Maridee Garnhum; Ev Glasser; Mary-Lou Halabi; Ester Kang; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Rosemary Martino; Annie Rochette; Sarah Rowe; Nancy Salbach; Brenda Semenko; Bridget Stack; Luchie Swinton; Valentine Weber; Matthew Mayer; Sue Verrilli; Gabrielle DeVeber; John Andersen; Karen Barlow; Caitlin Cassidy; Marie-Emmanuelle Dilenge; Darcy Fehlings; Ryan Hung; Jerome Iruthayarajah; Laura Lenz; Annette Majnemer; Jacqueline Purtzki; Mubeen Rafay; Lyn K Sonnenberg; Ashleigh Townley; Shannon Janzen; Norine Foley; Robert Teasell
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.266

5.  Cost-effectiveness of stroke unit care followed by early supported discharge.

Authors:  Omer Saka; Victoria Serra; Yevgeniy Samyshkin; Alistair McGuire; Charles C D A Wolfe
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Implementing a simple care bundle is associated with improved outcomes in a national cohort of patients with ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Melanie Turner; Mark Barber; Hazel Dodds; David Murphy; Martin Dennis; Peter Langhorne; Mary-Joan Macleod
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Usual Clinical Practice for Early Supported Discharge after Stroke with Continued Rehabilitation at Home: An Observational Comparative Study.

Authors:  Malin Tistad; Lena von Koch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of early supported discharge after stroke on patient reported outcome based on the Swedish Riksstroke registry.

Authors:  Anna Bråndal; Marie Eriksson; Eva-Lotta Glader; Per Wester
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Stephen Morris; Rachael M Hunter; Angus I G Ramsay; Ruth Boaden; Christopher McKevitt; Catherine Perry; Nanik Pursani; Anthony G Rudd; Lee H Schwamm; Simon J Turner; Pippa J Tyrrell; Charles D A Wolfe; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.