Kate E McBride1,2, Michael J Solomon3,4,5, Tim Lambert4,6, Sarah O'Shannassy3, Catherine Yates7, Jemima Isbester7, Nick Glozier4,8. 1. RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, PO Box M157, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. kate.mcbride@health.nsw.gov.au. 2. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. kate.mcbride@health.nsw.gov.au. 3. RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, PO Box M157, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 6. ccCHiP, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 7. Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 8. Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: People with serious mental illness (SMI) have significantly worse surgical outcomes compared to the general population. There are many contributing factors to this complex issue, however consideration of the surgical experience from the patient's own perspective has never been undertaken. This lack of understanding prevents the provision of truly patient centred care and may limit the impact of potential improvement initiatives. Therefore this study aims to describe and better understand the surgical experience from the perspective of patients with SMI. METHODS: Within this qualitative study, semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted between August 2019 - June 2020, with 10 consenting participants with SMI who had surgery in the previous 2 years. A thematic analysis approach was used to explore both the positive and negative aspects of the participant's surgical experience commencing from pre-operative consultation to hospital discharge and follow-up. RESULTS: Four main themes and related subthemes emerged including i) the perceived lack of mental ill health recognition, ii) highly variable patient and clinician interactions, iii) the impact of healthcare services, and iv) strategies for improvement. CONCLUSION: Surgical patients with SMI want to be treated like everyone else whilst still having their mental ill health acknowledged and proactively managed despite this rarely occurring, which is valuable information for all surgical teams to consider and learn from. Participants were able to describe several readily implementable strategies to potentially improve their care and overall surgical experience, and as such highlight considerable opportunities for these to be tested and evaluated for this underserved patient group.
BACKGROUND:People with serious mental illness (SMI) have significantly worse surgical outcomes compared to the general population. There are many contributing factors to this complex issue, however consideration of the surgical experience from the patient's own perspective has never been undertaken. This lack of understanding prevents the provision of truly patient centred care and may limit the impact of potential improvement initiatives. Therefore this study aims to describe and better understand the surgical experience from the perspective of patients with SMI. METHODS: Within this qualitative study, semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted between August 2019 - June 2020, with 10 consenting participants with SMI who had surgery in the previous 2 years. A thematic analysis approach was used to explore both the positive and negative aspects of the participant's surgical experience commencing from pre-operative consultation to hospital discharge and follow-up. RESULTS: Four main themes and related subthemes emerged including i) the perceived lack of mental ill health recognition, ii) highly variable patient and clinician interactions, iii) the impact of healthcare services, and iv) strategies for improvement. CONCLUSION: Surgical patients with SMI want to be treated like everyone else whilst still having their mental ill health acknowledged and proactively managed despite this rarely occurring, which is valuable information for all surgical teams to consider and learn from. Participants were able to describe several readily implementable strategies to potentially improve their care and overall surgical experience, and as such highlight considerable opportunities for these to be tested and evaluated for this underserved patient group.
Authors: Jheanell Gabbidon; Sarah Clement; Adrienne van Nieuwenhuizen; Aliya Kassam; Elaine Brohan; Ian Norman; Graham Thornicroft Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Kate E McBride; Michael J Solomon; Jane M Young; Daniel Steffens; Tim J Lambert; Nick Glozier; Paul G Bannon Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Laurel A Copeland; John E Zeber; Edward Y Sako; Eric M Mortensen; Mary Jo Pugh; Chen-Pin Wang; Marcos I Restrepo; Julianne Flynn; Andrea A MacCarthy; Valerie A Lawrence Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 2.102