Tim Seidler1,2, Andreas Schuster1,2, Sören J Backhaus1,2, Torben Lange1,2, Elisabeth F George1,2, Kristian Hellenkamp1,2, Roman J Gertz3, Marcus Billing1, Rolf Wachter1,4, Michael Steinmetz5,2, Shelby Kutty6, Uwe Raaz1,2, Joachim Lotz7,2, Tim Friede8,2, Martin Uecker7,2,9, Gerd Hasenfuß1,2,9. 1. From the Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University (S.J.B., T.L., E.F.G., K.H., M.B., R.W., U.R., G.H., T.S., A.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany. 2. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Germany (S.J.B., T.L., E.F.G., K.H., M.S., U.R., J.L., T.F., M.U., G.H., T.S., A.S.). 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany (R.J.G.). 4. Clinic and Policlinic for Cardiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (R.W.). 5. Departments of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine (M.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany. 6. Taussig Heart Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (S.K.). 7. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.L., M.U.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany. 8. Medical Statistics (T.F.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany. 9. Cluster of Excellence "Multiscale Bioimaging: from Molecular Machines to Networks of Excitable Cells" (MBExC), University of Göttingen, Germany (M.U., G.H.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right heart catheterization using exercise stress is the reference standard for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but carries the risk of the invasive procedure. We hypothesized that real-time cardiac magnetic resonance (RT-CMR) exercise imaging with pathophysiologic data at excellent temporal and spatial resolution may represent a contemporary noninvasive alternative for diagnosing HFpEF. METHODS: The HFpEF-Stress trial (CMR Exercise Stress Testing in HFpEF; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03260621. URL: https://dzhk.de/; Unique identifier: DZHK-17) prospectively recruited 75 patients with echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction and dyspnea on exertion (E/e'>8, New York Heart Association class ≥II) to undergo echocardiography, right heart catheterization, and RT-CMR at rest and during exercise stress. HFpEF was defined according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (≥15 mm Hg at rest or ≥25 mm Hg during exercise stress). RT-CMR functional assessments included time-volume curves for total and early (1/3) diastolic left ventricular filling, left atrial (LA) emptying, and left ventricular/LA long axis strain. RESULTS: Patients with HFpEF (n=34; median pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at rest, 13 mm Hg; at stress, 27 mm Hg) had higher E/e' (12.5 versus 9.15), NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; 255 versus 75 ng/L), and LA volume index (43.8 versus 36.2 mL/m2) compared with patients with noncardiac dyspnea (n=34; rest, 8 mm Hg; stress, 18 mm Hg; P≤0.001 for all). Seven patients were excluded because of the presence of non-HFpEF cardiac disease causing dyspnea on imaging. There were no differences in RT-CMR left ventricular total and early diastolic filling at rest and during exercise stress (P≥0.164) between patients with HFpEF and noncardiac dyspnea. RT-CMR revealed significantly impaired LA total and early (P<0.001) diastolic emptying in patients with HFpEF during exercise stress. RT-CMR exercise stress LA long axis strain was independently associated with HFpEF (adjusted odds ratio, 0.657 [95% CI, 0.516-0.838]; P=0.001) after adjustment for clinical and imaging measures and emerged as the best predictor for HFpEF (area under the curve at rest 0.82 versus exercise stress 0.93; P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: RT-CMR allows highly accurate identification of HFpEF during physiologic exercise and qualifies as a suitable noninvasive diagnostic alternative. These results will need to be confirmed in multicenter prospective research studies to establish widespread routine clinical use. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03260621. URL: https://dzhk.de/; Unique identifier: DZHK-17.
BACKGROUND: Right heart catheterization using exercise stress is the reference standard for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but carries the risk of the invasive procedure. We hypothesized that real-time cardiac magnetic resonance (RT-CMR) exercise imaging with pathophysiologic data at excellent temporal and spatial resolution may represent a contemporary noninvasive alternative for diagnosing HFpEF. METHODS: The HFpEF-Stress trial (CMR Exercise Stress Testing in HFpEF; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03260621. URL: https://dzhk.de/; Unique identifier: DZHK-17) prospectively recruited 75 patients with echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction and dyspnea on exertion (E/e'>8, New York Heart Association class ≥II) to undergo echocardiography, right heart catheterization, and RT-CMR at rest and during exercise stress. HFpEF was defined according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (≥15 mm Hg at rest or ≥25 mm Hg during exercise stress). RT-CMR functional assessments included time-volume curves for total and early (1/3) diastolic left ventricular filling, left atrial (LA) emptying, and left ventricular/LA long axis strain. RESULTS: Patients with HFpEF (n=34; median pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at rest, 13 mm Hg; at stress, 27 mm Hg) had higher E/e' (12.5 versus 9.15), NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; 255 versus 75 ng/L), and LA volume index (43.8 versus 36.2 mL/m2) compared with patients with noncardiac dyspnea (n=34; rest, 8 mm Hg; stress, 18 mm Hg; P≤0.001 for all). Seven patients were excluded because of the presence of non-HFpEF cardiac disease causing dyspnea on imaging. There were no differences in RT-CMR left ventricular total and early diastolic filling at rest and during exercise stress (P≥0.164) between patients with HFpEF and noncardiac dyspnea. RT-CMR revealed significantly impaired LA total and early (P<0.001) diastolic emptying in patients with HFpEF during exercise stress. RT-CMR exercise stress LA long axis strain was independently associated with HFpEF (adjusted odds ratio, 0.657 [95% CI, 0.516-0.838]; P=0.001) after adjustment for clinical and imaging measures and emerged as the best predictor for HFpEF (area under the curve at rest 0.82 versus exercise stress 0.93; P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: RT-CMR allows highly accurate identification of HFpEF during physiologic exercise and qualifies as a suitable noninvasive diagnostic alternative. These results will need to be confirmed in multicenter prospective research studies to establish widespread routine clinical use. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03260621. URL: https://dzhk.de/; Unique identifier: DZHK-17.
Authors: Vineeta Ojha; Omar K Khalique; Rishabh Khurana; Daniel Lorenzatti; Steve W Leung; Benny Lawton; Timothy C Slesnick; Joao C Cavalcante; Chiara-Bucciarelli Ducci; Amit R Patel; Claudia C Prieto; Sven Plein; Subha V Raman; Michael Salerno; Purvi Parwani Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Sören J Backhaus; Simon F Rösel; Thomas Stiermaier; Jonas Schmidt-Rimpler; Ruben Evertz; Alexander Schulz; Torben Lange; Johannes T Kowallick; Shelby Kutty; Boris Bigalke; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerd Hasenfuß; Holger Thiele; Ingo Eitel; Andreas Schuster Journal: Eur Heart J Open Date: 2022-08-12
Authors: Per M Arvidsson; Anders Nelsson; Martin Magnusson; J Gustav Smith; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Torben Lange; Sören J Backhaus; Bo Eric Beuthner; Rodi Topci; Karl-Rudolf Rigorth; Johannes T Kowallick; Ruben Evertz; Moritz Schnelle; Susana Ravassa; Javier Díez; Karl Toischer; Tim Seidler; Miriam Puls; Gerd Hasenfuß; Andreas Schuster Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Clement Lau; Mohamed M M Elshibly; Prathap Kanagala; Jeffrey P Khoo; Jayanth Ranjit Arnold; Sandeep Singh Hothi Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-18