Literature DB >> 33472231

Ten-Year Survival With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device and Aortic Valve Closure.

George V Letsou1,2, Fadi I Musfee3, Andrew D Lee2,4, Faisal Cheema2, Reynolds M Delgado1, O H Frazier1,2.   

Abstract

We report the long-term survival of a 46-year-old man supported with a HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device after complex repair of a bicuspid aortic valve, anomalous left main coronary artery, and dilated aorta. He has been maintained on an anticoagulation regimen of warfarin and low-dose aspirin without problems for 10 years, during which he has worked continuously and productively. Device flow has been kept at 10,000 rpm. Possible contributors to this long-term success include proper alignment of the device inflow cannula, pericardial patch closure of the left ventricular outflow tract, and, notably, the remarkable freedom from mechanical failure of the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Whether the higher flow rate produced by the pericardial patch closure contributes to pump longevity is unknown and merits further investigation.
© 2020 by the Texas Heart® Institute, Houston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart-assist devices; heart failure/therapy; treatment outcome; ventricle-assist devices; ventricular dysfunction, left/therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33472231      PMCID: PMC7819440          DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-19-7193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  5 in total

1.  Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.

Authors:  Ranjit John; Francis D Pagani; Yoshifumi Naka; Andrew Boyle; John V Conte; Stuart D Russell; Charles T Klodell; Carmelo A Milano; Joseph Rogers; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Durability of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashleigh Xie; Kevin Phan; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

3.  Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.

Authors:  William L Holman; David C Naftel; Chad E Eckert; Robert L Kormos; Daniel J Goldstein; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Francis D Pagani; Leslie W Miller; Stuart D Russell; Keith D Aaronson; Ranjit John; Andrew J Boyle; John V Conte; Roberta C Bogaev; Thomas E MacGillivray; Yoshifumi Naka; Donna Mancini; H Todd Massey; Leway Chen; Charles T Klodell; Juan M Aranda; Nader Moazami; Gregory A Ewald; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Device exchange after primary left ventricular assist device implantation: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  John M Stulak; Jennifer Cowger; Jonathon W Haft; Matthew A Romano; Keith D Aaronson; Francis D Pagani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.