Literature DB >> 3347181

Dissatisfaction in general practice: what do patients really want?

I D Steven1, R M Douglas.   

Abstract

In 31 general practices in Adelaide, approximately 100 consecutive adult patients aged 15-64 years completed a 21-item questionnaire that related to their dissatisfaction with aspects of the care that was provided in the practice. Fourteen of the practices were "solo" practices, five practices were two-person partnerships and 12 practices involved three or more partners. The 21 items divided naturally into five groups: "architecture", "receptionists", "accessibility", "quality" and "communication". Factor analysis of the responses provided support for the idea that "receptionists", "accessibility" and "communication" were independent issues for the respondents and that "quality" was less discrete and was embedded in a factor which we have labelled "mechanics". For nearly all items, the mean dissatisfaction values for the practices were greatest in the larger practices and least in the two-person practices, with solo practices occupying an intermediate position. The main dissatisfaction related to accessibility and communication. These issues are explored in the light of current trends in the organization of primary medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3347181     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb117835.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  4 in total

1.  The development of process and outcome measures for general practice consultations.

Authors:  A Porter
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1997-02

Review 2.  General practice fundholding: progress to date.

Authors:  R D Smith; P Wilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument.

Authors:  Herman J. Sixma; Jan J. Kerssens; Crétien Van Campen; Loe Peters
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Needs for CME in geriatrics. Part 1: Perceptions of patients and community informants.

Authors:  L Pereles; M L Russell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.275

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.