Literature DB >> 33471399

Considering extended right lobe grafts as major extended donor criteria in liver transplantation is justified.

Vladimir J Lozanovski1,2, Pascal Probst1,3, Ali Ramouz1, Alireza Arefidoust1, Omid Ghamarnejad1, Ehsan Aminizadeh1, Elias Khajeh1, Arianeb Mehrabi1,2.   

Abstract

The outcomes of split-liver transplantation are controversial. This study compared outcomes and morbidity after extended right lobe liver transplantation (ERLT) and whole liver transplantation (WLT) in adults. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly for studies on ERLT and its impact on graft and patient survival, and postoperative complications. Graft loss and patient mortality odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random-effects model. Vascular and biliary complications, primary nonfunction, 3-month, 1-, and 3-year graft and patient survival, and retransplantation after ERLT and WLT were analyzed. The literature search yielded 10 594 articles. After exclusion, 22 studies (n = 75 799 adult transplant patients) were included in the analysis. ERLT was associated with lower 3-month (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.09-1.89, P = 0.01), 1-year (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.08-1.97, P = 0.01), and 3-year (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.01-1.84, P = 0.04) graft survival. WL grafts were less associated with retransplantation (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.41-0.80; P < 0.01), vascular complications (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.38-0.74, P < 0.01) and biliary complications (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.47-0.95; P = 0.03). Considering ERLT as major Extended Donor Criteria is justified because ERL grafts are associated with vasculobiliary complications and the need for retransplantation, and have a negative influence on graft survival.
© 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extended right lobe liver transplantation; major extended donor criteria; meta-analysis; split-liver transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33471399     DOI: 10.1111/tri.13824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  2 in total

1.  Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vladimir J Lozanovski; Ali Ramouz; Ehsan Aminizadeh; Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh; Elias Khajeh; Heike Probst; Susanne Picardi; Christian Rupp; De-Hua Chang; Pascal Probst; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-01-06

2.  Is it safe to expand the indications for split liver transplantation in adults? A single-center analysis of 155 in-situ splits.

Authors:  Ngee-Soon Lau; Mark Ly; Ken Liu; Avik Majumdar; Simone I Strasser; Raaj K Biswas; Geoffrey W McCaughan; Michael Crawford; Carlo Pulitano
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.456

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.