Sumi Yoon1, Mina Hur2, Mikyoung Park3, Hanah Kim2, Seung Wan Kim2, Tae-Hwan Lee2, Minjeong Nam2, Hee-Won Moon2, Yeo-Min Yun2. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Vision Pro (West Medica, Perchtoldsdorf, Austria) is a recently developed digital morphology analyzer. We evaluated the performance of Vision Pro on white blood cell (WBC) differentials. METHODS: In a total of 200 peripheral blood smear samples (100 normal and 100 abnormal samples), WBC preclassification and reclassification by Vision Pro were evaluated and compared with manual WBC count, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (H20-A2). RESULTS: The overall sensitivity was high for normal WBCs and nRBCs (80.1-98.0%). The overall specificity and overall efficiency were high for all cell classes (98.1-100.0% and 97.7-99.9%, respectively). The absolute values of mean differences between Vision Pro and manual count ranged from 0.01 to 1.31. In leukopenic samples, those values ranged from 0.09 to 2.01. For normal WBCs, Vision Pro preclassification and manual count showed moderate or high correlations (r=0.52-0.88) except for basophils (r=0.34); after reclassification, the correlation between Vision Pro and manual count was improved (r=0.36-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluated the performance of Vision Pro on WBC differentials. Vision Pro showed reliable analytical performance on WBC differentials with improvement after reclassification. Vision Pro could help improve laboratory workflow.
OBJECTIVES: Vision Pro (West Medica, Perchtoldsdorf, Austria) is a recently developed digital morphology analyzer. We evaluated the performance of Vision Pro on white blood cell (WBC) differentials. METHODS: In a total of 200 peripheral blood smear samples (100 normal and 100 abnormal samples), WBC preclassification and reclassification by Vision Pro were evaluated and compared with manual WBC count, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (H20-A2). RESULTS: The overall sensitivity was high for normal WBCs and nRBCs (80.1-98.0%). The overall specificity and overall efficiency were high for all cell classes (98.1-100.0% and 97.7-99.9%, respectively). The absolute values of mean differences between Vision Pro and manual count ranged from 0.01 to 1.31. In leukopenic samples, those values ranged from 0.09 to 2.01. For normal WBCs, Vision Pro preclassification and manual count showed moderate or high correlations (r=0.52-0.88) except for basophils (r=0.34); after reclassification, the correlation between Vision Pro and manual count was improved (r=0.36-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluated the performance of Vision Pro on WBC differentials. Vision Pro showed reliable analytical performance on WBC differentials with improvement after reclassification. Vision Pro could help improve laboratory workflow.