| Literature DB >> 33470643 |
Antonio Loforte1, Michele Di Mauro2, Carlo Pellegrini3, Christian Monterosso3, Stefano Pelenghi3, Antonella Degani3, Mauro Rinaldi4, Erik Cura Stura4, Gabriele Sales4, Giorgia Montrucchio4, Domenico Mangino5, Alberto Terrini5, Davide Pacini1, Alessandro Affronti6, Vincenzo Tarzia7, Tomaso Bottio7, Antonio Pantaleo8, Francesco Donatelli9, Antonio Miceli9, Francesco Santini10, Antonio Salsano10, Andrea Colli11, Giacomo Ravenni11, Andrea Montalto12, Francesco Musumeci12, Loris Salvador13, Gino Gerosa7, Alessandro Parolari14, Marco Picichè13.
Abstract
An increased need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is going to become evident as treatment of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory distress syndrome. This is the first report of the Italian Society for Cardiac Surgery (SICCH) on preliminary experience with COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support. Data from 12 Italian hospitals participating in SICCH were retrospectively analyzed. Between March 1 and September 15, 2020, a veno-venous (VV) ECMO system was installed in 67 patients (94%) and a veno-arterio-venous ECMO in four (6%). Five patients required VA ECMO after initial weaning from VV ECMO. Thirty (42.2%) patients were weaned from ECMO, while 39 (54.9%) died on ECMO, and six (8.5%) died after ECMO removal. Overall hospital survival was 36.6% (n = 26). Main causes of death were multiple organ failure (n = 14, 31.1%) and sepsis (n = 11, 24.4%). On multivariable analysis, predictors of death while on ECMO support were older age (p = 0.048), elevated pre-ECMO C-reactive protein level (p = 0.048), higher positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilator (p = 0.036) and lower lung compliance (p = 0.032). If the conservative treatment is not effective, ECMO support might be considered as life-saving rescue therapy for COVID-19 refractory respiratory failure. However warm caution and thoughtful approaches for timely detection and treatment should be taken for such a delicate patients population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33470643 DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ASAIO J ISSN: 1058-2916 Impact factor: 2.872