| Literature DB >> 33470549 |
Xiaodong Chen1, Weiteng Zhang1, Xiangwei Sun1, Mingming Shi2, Libin Xu2, Yiqi Cai2, Wenjing Chen2, Chenchen Mao2, Xian Shen1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a public health problem, is reportedly related to an increased risk of postoperative complications after surgery. However, whether MetS have an effect on complications after gastric cancer (GC) surgery are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of preoperative MetS on complications after gastrectomy.Entities:
Keywords: gastrectomy; metabolic syndrome; nomogram; postoperative complications
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33470549 PMCID: PMC7541147 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Figure 1Flow chart of study procedure
Clinical and Pathological Characteristics
| Characteristic | Value (N = 628) |
|---|---|
| Age (y), mean (SD) | 62.92 ± 11.45 |
| BMI (kg/cm2), mean (SD) | 21.45 ± 3.01 |
| Metabolic disorders [n, (%)] | |
| No | 544 (86.6%) |
| Yes | 84 (13.4%) |
| Gender [n, (%)] | |
| Male | 450 (71.7%) |
| Female | 178 (28.3%) |
| Charlson score [n, (%)] | |
| 0 | 385 (61.3%) |
| 1‐2 | 220 (35.0%) |
| 3‐6 | 23 (3.7%) |
| Preoperative anemia [n, (%)] | |
| No | 517 (82.3%) |
| Yes | 111 (17.7%) |
| Preoperative hypoalbuminemia [n, (%)] | |
| No | 522 (%) |
| Yes | 106 (%) |
| Tumor size [n, (%)] | |
| <2.1 cm | 189 (30.1%) |
| ≥2.1 cm | 439 (69.9%) |
| Tumor location [n, (%)] | |
| Antrum | 550 (87.6%) |
| Body | 50 (8.0%) |
| Cardia | 28 (4.4%) |
| Histopathological differentiation [n, (%)] | |
| Differentiation | 549 (87.4%) |
| Non‐ differentiation | 49 (7.8%) |
| Signet ring cell | 30 (4.8%) |
| Lymphatic invasion [n, (%)] | |
| N0 | 258 (41.1%) |
| N1 | 108 (17.1%) |
| N2 | 131 (20.9%) |
| N3 | 131(20.9%) |
| Invasion depth [n, (%)] | |
| T1/T2 | 229 (36.5%) |
| T3/T4 | 399 (63.5%) |
| TNM stage [n, (%)] | |
| I‐II | 287 (45.7%) |
| III‐IV | 341 (54.3%) |
| Abdominal surgery history [n, (%)] | |
| No | 569 (90.6%) |
| Yes | 59(9.4%) |
| Preoperative obstruction [n, (%)] | |
| No | 536 (85.4%) |
| Yes | 92(14.6%) |
| Preoperative perforation [n, (%)] | |
| No | 626 (99.7%) |
| Yes | 2 (0.3%) |
| Preoperative bleeding [n, (%)] | |
| No | 503 (80.1%) |
| Yes | 125 (19.9%) |
| Anastomosis type [n, (%)] | |
| Bill‐roth I | 236 (37.6%) |
| Bill‐roth II | 349 (55.6%) |
| Other | 43 (6.8%) |
| Laparoscope [n, (%)] | |
| No | 603 (96.0%) |
| Yes | 25 (4.0%) |
| Preoperative stroke history [n, (%)] | |
| No | 623 (99.2%) |
| Yes | 5 (0.8%) |
| CEA [n, (%)] | |
| <5.0ng/ml | 505 (80.4%) |
| ≥5.0ng/ml | 123 (19.6%) |
| CA199 [n, (%)] | |
| <37 kU/L | 545 (86.8%) |
| ≥37 kU/L | 83 (13.2%) |
Abbreviation: BMI, bodymass index.
Figure 2MetS and non‐MetS Patients frequency distribution with different ages stratum
Postoperative outcomes
| Factors | Total (n = 628) | MetS (n = 84) | Non‐MetS (n = 544) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total complications | 164 (26.11%) | 35 (41.67%) | 129 (23.71%) | <.001* |
| Detail of complications | ||||
| Surgical complications | ||||
| Gastroparesis | 23 (3.66%) | 9 (10.71%) | 14 (2.57%) | <.001* |
| Intestinal obstruction | 14 (2.23%) | 1 (1.19%) | 13 (2.39%) | .453 |
| Severe wound infection | 10 (1.59%) | 2 (2.38%) | 8 (1.47%) | .558 |
| Bleeding | 14 (2.23%) | 3 (3.57%) | 11 (2.02%) | .403 |
| Intra‐abdominal infection | 22 (3.50%) | 4 (4.76%) | 18 (3.31%) | .500 |
| Anastomotic leakage | 9 (1.43%) | 1 (1.19%) | 8 (1.47%) | .841 |
| Medical complications | ||||
| Pulmonary complications | 16 (2.55%) | 4 (4.76%) | 12 (2.21%) | .207 |
| Pleural and peritoneal effusion | 11 (1.75%) | 5 (5.95%) | 6 (1.10%) | .002* |
| Cardiac complications | 3 (0.48%) | 0 (0.00%) | 3 (0.55%) | .353 |
| Venous thrombosis | 12 (1.91%) | 2 (2.38%) | 10 (1.84%) | .743 |
| Second operation | 1 (0.16%) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (0.18%) | .592 |
| Complex complications (two or more complications) | 29 (4.62%) | 4 (4.76%) | 25 (4.60%) | .946 |
Clavien‐Dindo grade ≥ II.
Statistically significant (P < .05).
Figure 3Multivariate analysis to evaluate potential predictive factors for severe postoperative complications
Figure 4Developed nomogram for predicting postoperative complications in GC patients
Figure 5DCA for the nomogram. Decision curve analysis for the nomogram. The y‐axis measures the net benefit. The red line represents the nomogram. The gray line represents the assumption that all cases were concordant and The black line represents the assumption that no cases were concordant
The risk rating models for postoperative complications
| level | Conditions |
|---|---|
| 0 |
Tumor size < 2.1cm Age < 65 years No preoperative metabolic syndrome Preoperative Charlson score = 0 points Not the Billroth II reconstruction |
| Ⅰa |
Tumor size > 2.1cm Age > 65 years No preoperative metabolic syndrome Preoperative Charlson score = 0 points Not the Billroth II reconstruction |
| Ⅰb |
Regardless of tumor size, meet one of the four conditions as Age > 65 years preoperative metabolic syndrome Preoperative Charlson score > 0 points Billroth II reconstruction |
| Ⅱa |
Tumor size < 2.1cm meet two of the four conditions as Age > 65 years preoperative metabolic syndrome Preoperative Charlson score > 0 points Billroth II reconstruction |
| Ⅱb |
Tumor size > 2.1cm meet two of the four conditions as Age > 65 years preoperative metabolic syndrome Preoperative Charlson score > 0 points Billroth II reconstruction |
| Ⅱc |
Tumor size > 2.1cm meet three of the four conditions as Age > 65 years preoperative metabolic syndrome Preoperative Charlson score > 0 points Billroth II reconstruction |
| Ⅲ |
Tumor size > 2.1cm Age > 65 years preoperative metabolic syndrome Preoperative Charlson score > 0 points Billroth II reconstruction |
Figure 6ROC curves for the postoperative complications risk‐rating model