Literature DB >> 33470353

Comparison of SAPS 3 performance in patients with and without solid tumor admitted to an intensive care unit in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study.

Leandro Utino Taniguchi1,2,3, Ellen Maria Pires Siqueira1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) in patients with and without solid cancer who were admitted to the intensive care unit of a comprehensive oncological hospital in Brazil.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of our administrative database of the first admission of adult patients to the intensive care unit from 2012 to 2016. The patients were categorized according to the presence of solid cancer. We evaluated discrimination using the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration using the calibration belt approach.
RESULTS: We included 7,254 patients (41.5% had cancer, and 12.1% died during hospitalization). Oncological patients had higher hospital mortality than nononcological patients (14.1% versus 10.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). SAPS 3 discrimination was better for oncological patients (AUROC = 0.85) than for nononcological patients (AUROC = 0.79) (p < 0.001). After we applied the calibration belt in oncological patients, the SAPS 3 matched the average observed rates with a confidence level of 95%. In nononcological patients, the SAPS 3 overestimated mortality in those with a low-middle risk. Calibration was affected by the time period only for nononcological patients.
CONCLUSION: SAPS 3 performed differently between oncological and nononcological patients in our single-center cohort, and variation over time (mainly calibration) was observed. This finding should be taken into account when evaluating severity-of-illness score performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33470353      PMCID: PMC7853685          DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20200089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva        ISSN: 0103-507X


  20 in total

Review 1.  Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mark T Keegan; Ognjen Gajic; Bekele Afessa
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM.

Authors:  Jorge I F Salluh; Márcio Soares
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Validation of four prognostic scores in patients with cancer admitted to Brazilian intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Márcio Soares; Ulisses V A Silva; José M M Teles; Eliézer Silva; Pedro Caruso; Suzana M A Lobo; Felipe Dal Pizzol; Luciano P Azevedo; Frederico B de Carvalho; Jorge I F Salluh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Intensive care of the cancer patient: recent achievements and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Marcio Soares; Michael Darmon; Dominique Benoit; Stephen Pastores; Bekele Afessa
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.

Authors:  XueZhong Xing; Yong Gao; HaiJun Wang; ChuLin Huang; ShiNing Qu; Hao Zhang; Hao Wang; KeLin Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients in European ICUs.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Antonio A Artigas; Charles L Sprung; Rui Moreno; Yasser Sakr; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Admission factors associated with intensive care unit readmission in critically ill oncohematological patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cinthia Mendes Rodrigues; Ellen Maria Campos Pires; Jorge Patrick Oliveira Feliciano; Jose Mauro Vieira; Leandro Utino Taniguchi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  The Epimed Monitor ICU Database®: a cloud-based national registry for adult intensive care unit patients in Brazil.

Authors:  Fernando Godinho Zampieri; Márcio Soares; Lunna Perdigão Borges; Jorge Ibrain Figueira Salluh; Otávio Tavares Ranzani
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.