Literature DB >> 33469972

Explantation of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices: A Retrospective Review of 744 Patients Followed for at Least 12 Months.

Jonathan M Hagedorn1, Christopher M Lam2, Ryan S D'Souza1, Dawood Sayed2, Markus A Bendel1, Chris Thuc Ha1, Joshua Romero1, Morgan Hall3, Eric Freeman3, Brian F Richardson3, Bryan C Hoelzer3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: High-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) has achieved analgesia superior to traditional SCS in a number of studies. However, there is concern regarding long-term outcomes of 10 kHz-SCS. Prior work has suggested that explant rates are higher with 10 kHz-SCS. Our primary objective was to determine the explant rate of 10 kHz-SCS in a large patient cohort from multiple centers followed for at least 12 months after implant surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who received a 10 kHz-SCS implant before July 1, 2019. We abstracted patient demographics, implant date, primary site of pain, implant indication, explant date, and reason for explant. A total of 744 patients were included in the study analysis.
RESULTS: Average age of the overall cohort was 65.53 years and 407 (54.7%) were women. Average follow-up for all patients was 793 days. There were a total of 76 explants (10.2%). The most common reason for explant was loss of efficacy, which accounted for 39 explants (51.3% of total explants, 5.2% of overall cohort). Female sex and radiculopathy as the SCS indication were associated with statistically significant decreased risk of 10 kHz-SCS explant.
CONCLUSIONS: We found 10 kHz-SCS explant rates to be similar to prior reported explant rates for traditional SCS devices. Patient-related factors including female sex and radiculopathy as the primary SCS indication may be protective factors against explantation.
© 2021 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Explantation; high frequency; neuromodulation; outcomes; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33469972     DOI: 10.1111/ner.13359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  3 in total

Review 1.  An Advanced Practice Provider Guide to Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Chelsey M Hoffmann; Ryan S D'Souza; Jonathan M Hagedorn
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 2.832

Review 2.  Neuromodulation Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryan S D'Souza; Yeng F Her; Max Y Jin; Mahmoud Morsi; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-07

Review 3.  Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review.

Authors:  Ryan S D'Souza; Eva Kubrova; Yeng F Her; Ross A Barman; Brandon J Smith; Gabriel M Alvarez; Tyler E West; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.070

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.