Literature DB >> 33469814

Low handgrip strength is associated with reduced functional recovery and longer hospital stay in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective cohort study.

Seiko Nagaoka1, Yoshihiro Yoshimura2, Takaki Eto3, Mitsukane Kumagi4.   

Abstract

AIM: Despite the growing interest in sarcopenia in clinical medicine, there is little evidence to support the association between muscle strength and functional prognosis in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of low handgrip strength (HGS) on functional outcomes in older patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed between 2017 and 2019 on consecutive patients with conservatively treated vertebral compression fractures who were newly admitted for post-acute rehabilitation. HGS was measured on admission. Outcomes included the Functional Independence Measure-motor (FIM-motor) score at discharge and length of hospital stay. Multivariate linear regression analyses were utilized to determine whether HGS at baseline was significantly associated with these outcomes after adjustment for potential confounders.
RESULTS: Of the 207 patients admitted, 159 patients (mean age 83 years; 78% women) were enrolled in the analysis. The mean (standard deviation: SD) HGS was 15.9 (7.7) kg. Multivariate analysis showed that HGS at admission was independently associated with the FIM-motor score at discharge (β = 0.107, p = 0.006) and length of stay (β = - 0.118, p = 0.030).
CONCLUSION: Low HGS is commonly found and is associated with reduced functional recovery and prolonged hospital stay in older patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Early detection and interventions for low HGS could help achieve improved outcomes. However, further studies are needed to validate our findings.
© 2021. European Geriatric Medicine Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcomes; Handgrip strength; Length of stay; Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; Sarcopenia

Year:  2021        PMID: 33469814     DOI: 10.1007/s41999-020-00446-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med        ISSN: 1878-7649            Impact factor:   1.710


  27 in total

1.  Sarcopenia is associated with worse recovery of physical function and dysphagia and a lower rate of home discharge in Japanese hospitalized adults undergoing convalescent rehabilitation.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yoshimura; Hidetaka Wakabayashi; Takahiro Bise; Fumihiko Nagano; Sayuri Shimazu; Ai Shiraishi; Makio Yamaga; Hiroaki Koga
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Liang-Kung Chen; Jean Woo; Prasert Assantachai; Tung-Wai Auyeung; Ming-Yueh Chou; Katsuya Iijima; Hak Chul Jang; Lin Kang; Miji Kim; Sunyoung Kim; Taro Kojima; Masafumi Kuzuya; Jenny S W Lee; Sang Yoon Lee; Wei-Ju Lee; Yunhwan Lee; Chih-Kuang Liang; Jae-Young Lim; Wee Shiong Lim; Li-Ning Peng; Ken Sugimoto; Tomoki Tanaka; Chang Won Won; Minoru Yamada; Teimei Zhang; Masahiro Akishita; Hidenori Arai
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 3.  Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Juliet E Compston; Michael R McClung; William D Leslie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Sarcopenia and sarcopenic leg as potential risk factors for acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture among older women.

Authors:  Tetsuro Hida; Hiroshi Shimokata; Yoshihito Sakai; Sadayuki Ito; Yasumoto Matsui; Marie Takemura; Takehiro Kasai; Naoki Ishiguro; Atsushi Harada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.

Authors:  Darryl P Leong; Koon K Teo; Sumathy Rangarajan; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Alvaro Avezum; Andres Orlandini; Pamela Seron; Suad H Ahmed; Annika Rosengren; Roya Kelishadi; Omar Rahman; Sumathi Swaminathan; Romaina Iqbal; Rajeev Gupta; Scott A Lear; Aytekin Oguz; Khalid Yusoff; Katarzyna Zatonska; Jephat Chifamba; Ehimario Igumbor; Viswanathan Mohan; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; Hongqiu Gu; Wei Li; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Frailty consensus: a call to action.

Authors:  John E Morley; Bruno Vellas; G Abellan van Kan; Stefan D Anker; Juergen M Bauer; Roberto Bernabei; Matteo Cesari; W C Chumlea; Wolfram Doehner; Jonathan Evans; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Paul R Katz; Theodore K Malmstrom; Roger J McCarter; Luis M Gutierrez Robledo; Ken Rockwood; Stephan von Haehling; Maurits F Vandewoude; Jeremy Walston
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women.

Authors:  Saeko Fujiwara; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Naomi Masunari; Kumiko Naito; Gen Suzuki; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years.

Authors:  S Haleem; L Lutchman; R Mayahi; J E Grice; M J Parker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Sarcopenia affects conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Hiroki Iida; Yoshihito Sakai; Tsuyoshi Watanabe; Hiroki Matsui; Marie Takemura; Yasumoto Matsui; Atsushi Harada; Tetsuro Hida; Kenyu Ito; Sadayuki Ito
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2018-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.