Literature DB >> 33468528

Causal modelling of variation in clinical practice and long-term outcomes of ADHD using Norwegian registry data: the ADHD controversy project.

Arnstein Mykletun1,2,3,4, Tarjei Widding-Havneraas2,5, Ashmita Chaulagain2,5, Ingvild Lyhmann2,5, Ingvar Bjelland5,6, Anne Halmøy5,6, Felix Elwert7, Peter Butterworth8, Simen Markussen9, Henrik Daae Zachrisson10, Knut Rypdal2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is among the most common mental disorders in children and adolescents, and it is a strong risk factor for several adverse psychosocial outcomes over the lifespan. There are large between-country and within-country variations in diagnosis and medication rates. Due to ethical and practical considerations, a few studies have examined the effects of receiving a diagnosis, and there is a lack of research on effects of medication on long-term outcomes.Our project has four aims organised in four work packages: (WP1) To examine the prognosis of ADHD (with and without medication) compared with patients with other psychiatric diagnoses, patients in contact with public sector child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics (without diagnosis) and the general population; (WP2) Examine within-country variation in ADHD diagnoses and medication rates by clinics' catchment area; and(WP3) Identify causal effects of being diagnosed with ADHD and (WP4) ADHD medication on long-term outcomes. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Our project links several nationwide Norwegian registries. The patient sample is all persons aged 5-18 years that were in contact with public sector child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics in 2009-2011. Our comparative analysis of prognosis will be based on survival analysis and mixed-effects models. Our analysis of variation will apply mixed-effects models and generalised linear models. We have two identification strategies for the effect of being diagnosed with ADHD and of receiving medication on long-term outcomes. Both strategies rely on using preference-based instrumental variables, which in our project are based on provider preferences for ADHD diagnosis and medication. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee, Norway (REC number 2017/2150/REC south-east D). All papers will be published in open-access journals and results will be presented in national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN11573246 and ISRCTN11891971. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child & adolescent psychiatry; epidemiology; mental health

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468528      PMCID: PMC7817799          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  91 in total

1.  The past, present and future of psychiatric diagnosis.

Authors:  Allen Frances
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Social adversity predicts ADHD-medication in school children--a national cohort study.

Authors:  A Hjern; G R Weitoft; F Lindblad
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 3.  Potential bias of instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Laura Faden Garabedian; Paula Chu; Sengwee Toh; Alan M Zaslavsky; Stephen B Soumerai
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as an extreme of a continuous trait: a quantitative genetic study of 8,500 twin pairs.

Authors:  Henrik Larsson; Henrik Anckarsater; Maria Råstam; Zheng Chang; Paul Lichtenstein
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 8.982

5.  Measuring inappropriate medical diagnosis and treatment in survey data: The case of ADHD among school-age children.

Authors:  William N Evans; Melinda S Morrill; Stephen T Parente
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Use of ADHD drugs in the Nordic countries: a population-based comparison study.

Authors:  H Zoëga; K Furu; M Halldórsson; P H Thomsen; A Sourander; J E Martikainen
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 6.392

7.  Age-dependent decline of symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: impact of remission definition and symptom type.

Authors:  J Biederman; E Mick; S V Faraone
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  ADHD, stimulant treatment in childhood and subsequent substance abuse in adulthood - a naturalistic long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Søren Dalsgaard; Preben Bo Mortensen; Morten Frydenberg; Per Hove Thomsen
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 9.  A systematic review and analysis of long-term outcomes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of treatment and non-treatment.

Authors:  Monica Shaw; Paul Hodgkins; Hervé Caci; Susan Young; Jennifer Kahle; Alisa G Woods; L Eugene Arnold
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Alternative causal inference methods in population health research: Evaluating tradeoffs and triangulating evidence.

Authors:  Ellicott C Matthay; Erin Hagan; Laura M Gottlieb; May Lynn Tan; David Vlahov; Nancy E Adler; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2019-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.