Literature DB >> 33468474

In Vivo Targeting of Escherichia coli with Vancomycin-Arginine.

Lewis F Neville1, Itamar Shalit2, Peter A Warn3, Marc H Scheetz4, Jiuzhi Sun5, Madeline B Chosy5, Paul A Wender5,6, Lynette Cegelski5, Jacob T Rendell2.   

Abstract

The ability of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) to extend the spectrum of activity of glycopeptides to Gram-negative bacteria was investigated. Its MIC towards Escherichia coli, including β-lactamase expressing Ambler classes A, B, and D, was 8 to 16 μg/ml. Addition of 8 times the MIC of V-r to E. coli was acutely bactericidal and associated with a low frequency of resistance (<2.32 × 10-10). In vivo, V-r markedly reduced E. coli burden by >7 log10 CFU/g in a thigh muscle model. These data warrant further development of V-r in combatting E. coli, including resistant forms.
Copyright © 2021 Neville et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; Gram-negative bacteria; antibiotic resistance; arginine; cationic peptides; multidrug resistance; vancomycin conjugate

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468474      PMCID: PMC8097466          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02416-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


INTRODUCTION

Novel antibiotics are desperately needed to combat priority 1 or urgent-threat pathogens (1–3). With only four new classes of antibiotics introduced into the market since the early 1960s (4), structural modifications of current antibiotics provide an attractive and possibly speedier approach to fulfill this significant unmet clinical need. Vancomycin is a standard-of-care glycopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of Gram-positive infections (5). Numerous reports have demonstrated augmentation of its antimicrobial activity against resistant strains via different chemical modifications (6–9). Furthermore, its molecular structure has been successfully manipulated to create a broader spectrum of activity in the targeting of Gram-negative bacteria via adjuvant, formulation, and cationic/lipophilic interventions (10, 11) or synergy with existing Gram-negative antibiotics (12, 13). Recently, the covalent conjugation of l-arginine to vancomycin, to produce vancomycin-l-arginine (V-R), led to promising Gram-negative properties via a cell wall mode of action (14). These findings encouraged us to further characterize the corresponding diastereomer vancomycin-d-arginine (V-r) in animal models of E. coli infection using the d-isomer of arginine to reduce the risk of conjugate hydrolysis (Fig. 1).
FIG 1

Vancomycin and vancomycin-d-arginine (V-r).

Vancomycin and vancomycin-d-arginine (V-r). V-r was synthesized in a single chemical step from commercially available vancomycin HCl (StruChem, Wujiang City, China) and d-arginine amide dihydrochloride (Aladdin Chemical Co., Shanghai, China). The crude compound was purified and isolated as the corresponding HCl salt at 95% purity by high-performance liquid chromatography based on a previously described procedure (14). Identity was confirmed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and time of flight mass spectrometry, and HCl content was quantified by ion-exchange chromatography. In various physicochemical screens, V-r behaved similarly to vancomycin, including no observed cellular cytotoxicity at concentrations ranging from 100 to 750 μM on human erythrocytes, HepG2, and primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells employing fetal bovine serum-deficient media to negate compound quenching (15) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Physicochemical properties of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) and vancomycin

Physicochemical propertiesaV-rVancomycin
Mol wt (free base)1,6041,449
LogD (octanol/buffer)Less than −4.01−5.14b
TD solubility in saline (mg/ml)373> 50
PPB (mouse/human % bound)65/7650/50
Red blood cell lysis (CC50, μM)>750>750
HepG2 cell cytotoxicity (CC50, μM)>750>750
hRPTEC biomarkersc (CC50, μM)>100>100
FoR (at 8× MIC)<2.32 × 10−10Not determined

TD, thermodynamic; PPB, plasma protein binding; hRPTEC, human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells; CC50, concentration at which 50% cytotoxicity is observed; FoR, frequency of resistance.

LogD vancomycin reported according to Dave and Morris (29).

Includes cell count, nuclear size, DNA structure, mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial membrane potential, phospholipidosis, and glutathione content.

Physicochemical properties of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) and vancomycin TD, thermodynamic; PPB, plasma protein binding; hRPTEC, human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells; CC50, concentration at which 50% cytotoxicity is observed; FoR, frequency of resistance. LogD vancomycin reported according to Dave and Morris (29). Includes cell count, nuclear size, DNA structure, mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial membrane potential, phospholipidosis, and glutathione content. MICs were determined in alignment with CLSI guidelines as previously described for V-R and cationic antimicrobial peptides (14, 16). The MIC range of V-r against 29 different E. coli strains was 8 to 16 μg/ml (MIC90, 16 μg/ml), including those with multiple resistance mechanisms (Table 2). The MIC of V-r against the efflux pump mutant strain JW0451-2 was 8 μg/ml, suggesting that V-r is unlikely to be a substrate for efflux in this pathogen. Notably, the MIC of V-r was also 8 μg/ml against two out of five of the Acinetobacter baumannii strains tested. In comparison, the MICs of vancomycin were significantly higher, at 64 to 256 μg/ml, against all E. coli and A. baumannii strains tested. Importantly, the antimicrobial potency of V-r towards a number of Gram-positive bacteria remained intact (Table 2). In frequency-of-resistance (FoR) assays at 8 times the MIC of V-r (128 μg/ml), E. coli ATCC 25922 demonstrated an extremely low FoR, at <2.32 × 10−10, which is similar to or lower than those with standard-of-care therapies, such as ciprofloxacin (17, 18). Time-kill assays were performed against uropathogenic E. coli strains, including the sequence type 131 (ST131) NCTC 13341 isolate. V-r, but not vancomycin, demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity to limits of detection (i.e., 100 CFU/ml) within 1 or 4 h of exposure, and this was maintained up to 24 h (Fig. 2).
TABLE 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of V-r and vancomycin

OrganismStrainSource, resistance mechanism or genotypeaAmbler classMIC (μg/ml) of:
V-rVancomycin
E. coliATCC 25922CLSI susceptible reference strain16128
E. coliUTI89Clinical isolate from patient with acute bladder infection16128
E. coliNCTC 13441Uropathogenic E. coli ST131, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1, aac6'-lb-cr, mph(A), catB4, tet(A), dfrA7, aadA5, sul1A, D16128
E. coliNCTC 13462blaCTX-M-2A16128
E. coliNCTC 13846Clinical isolate, bacteremia, UK 2013, EUCAST reference isolate, mcr-1864
E. coliAR055blaNDM-1, mph(A), blaCMY-6, dfrA17, sul1, tet(A), rmtC, aac(3)-IIa, blaOXA-1, aadA5B, C, D16128
E. coliAR089strB, blaCMY-2, tet(B), strA, sul2C16128
E. coliAR0114strB, blaTEM-1B, blaKPC-3, aadB, dfrA5, sul1, strA, sul2, cmIA1A16256
E. coliAR0137blaNDM-6, blaOXA-9, mph(A), blaTEM-1A, blaCMY-42, blaCTX-M-15, dfrA17, qnrS1, sul1, tet(B), aadA1, aac(3)-IIa, blaOXA-1, aadA5B16128
E. coliAR0150blaNDM-5, mph(A), blaTEM-1B, blaCMY-42, dfrA17, sul1, tet(A), aadA5A, B, C8128
E. coliAR0346mcr-1, ESBLA16256
E. coliAR0349mcr-1, ESBLA16128
E. coliAR0350mcr-1-16128
E. coliAR0493mcr-1, ESBLA16256
E. coliAR0494mcr-1-8128
E. coliB096aClinical isolate (UK) 2016, AmpCC16128
E. coliB808Clinical isolate (UK) 2016, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-15A16256
E. coliATCC BAA-2340blaKPCA16128
E. coliATCC BAA-2469blaNDM-1B16128
E. coliExPEC H5Clinical isolate (UK)8128
E. coliH4/5Clinical isolate, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-15A16256
E. coliIR3Clinical isolate, blaNDM-1B8128
E. coliIR45Clinical isolate, blaNDM-1B16128
E. coliIR57Clinical isolate, blaNDM-1B16256
E. coliSwiss 2 (AF45)Clinical isolate (South Africa) ST101, mcr-116128
E. coliSwiss 13Clinical isolate (France) ST69, mcr-116128
E. coliSwiss 15Clinical isolate (Switzerland) ST446, mcr-1, blaCTX-MA16128
E. coliBW25113Parent strain of BW25113ΔacrB::kan mutant8128
E. coliJW0451-2BW25113ΔacrB::kan, AcrB-deficient mutant, defective in ArcAB-TolC multidrug efflux system8128
A. baumanniiATCC 19606Isolated from urine, genome-sequenced strain32128
A. baumanniiACC00527Clinical respiratory isolate (USA) 2012, blaOXA-24D8128
A. baumanniiB803Clinical isolate (UK) 201632128
A. baumanniiGS2AB1Multiresistant clinical isolate (southern Europe) 201716128
A. baumanniiNaval-81Clinical isolate (USA) 20068128
S. aureusATCC 29213CLSI susceptible reference strain22
S. aureusNRS 384USA300-0114 MRSA, community associated0.52
E. faecalisATCC 29212CLSI QC strain12
E. faecalisB575Clinical isolate (northwest UK)12
S. agalactiaeB057Clinical isolate (northwest UK)0.060.5
S. agalactiaeB063Clinical isolate (northwest UK)0.061
S. pneumoniaeATCC 49619Reference strain0.250.5
S. pneumoniae3259-03Clinical isolate (northwest UK)0.50.5

ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

FIG 2

Time-kill of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) and vancomycin against E. coli uropathogens UTI89 and NCTC 13441.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of V-r and vancomycin ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase. Time-kill of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) and vancomycin against E. coli uropathogens UTI89 and NCTC 13441. Plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of V-r after subcutaneous (s.c.) administration (20 and 121 mg/kg) was determined in naive male CD-1 mice (n = 3/group) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for analysis with a lower limit of quantitation of 5 ng/ml (Table 3). V-r displayed first-order elimination, similar to vancomycin, after s.c. administration (19, 20). Prior to efficacy studies, a single s.c. administration of V-r was shown to be well tolerated in male CD-1 mice (n = 3) at the highest dose tested (800 mg/kg).
TABLE 3

PK parameters of V-r in CD-1 mice after s.c. administration

PK parameteraV-r at 20 mg/kgV-r at 121 mg/kg
Half-life (h)0.871.29
Cmax (mg/liter)20.498.4
Clearance (ml/min/kg)7.85.4
AUC (mg · h/liter)42.7366
Vd (liter/kg)0.590.60

Cmax, maximum concentration of drug in plasma; AUC, area under the curve; Vd, volume of distribution.

PK parameters of V-r in CD-1 mice after s.c. administration Cmax, maximum concentration of drug in plasma; AUC, area under the curve; Vd, volume of distribution. Using a screening-based strategy, preliminary proof-of-concept studies with V-r employed an abbreviated 9-h thigh muscle infection model in male CD-1 mice rendered neutropenic (21). To that end, an E. coli ATCC 25922 isolate was inoculated at 9.7 × 104 CFU into both thigh muscles per mouse (n = 5 per experimental group). V-r was administered s.c. every 2 h (110 to 880 mg/kg total dose) starting 1 h postinfection. At 9 h, thigh homogenates were prepared, and CFU were enumerated after culture on CLED (cystine-, lactose-, and electrolyte-deficient) agar. Compared to pretreatment and vehicle burdens of 5.1 ± 0.2 and 7.1 ± 0.1 log10 CFU/g tissue, respectively, V-r exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in bacterial burden of 1.2 to 3.4 log10 compared with vehicle (Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance using StatsDirect Statistical Analysis Software) (Table 4). V-r doses at 440 and 880 mg/kg afforded 1.0- and 1.3-log10 reductions below stasis, respectively, with an extrapolated static dose of 215 mg/kg. As anticipated, vancomycin failed to significantly impact E. coli burden at a dose equivalent to the highest dose of V-r. In a 24-h thigh muscle infection model, E. coli UTI89 was inoculated at 7.8 × 104 CFU into one thigh muscle per mouse (n = 5 to 8 per group) and treated with V-r (total dose, 200 to 1,400 mg) using an every-6-h dosing regimen from 1 h postinfection. All doses of >200 mg/kg significantly reduced burden below stasis by up to 2.7 log10 CFU/g. These bactericidal effects of V-r were statistically superior to those of ciprofloxacin, which induced a 1.4 log10 reduction from stasis (Fig. 3 and Table 5). Overall, V-r caused an ∼4 to 7.5 log10 reduction in bacterial burden, compared with vehicle control, over the entire dose range.
TABLE 4

Efficacy of V-r in an E. coli ATCC 25922 thigh muscle infection model (9 h) in neutropenic CD-1 mice

Group, total dose over 9 h (mg/kg)Log10 (group geometric mean ± SD CFU/g)Log10 change from vehicle (CFU/g)P value (versus vehicle)
Pretreatment5.1 ± 0.18−2.010.0045
Vehicle7.11 ± 0.1200
V-r, 1105.87 ± 0.60−1.240.0415
V-r, 4404.14 ± 0.63−2.97<0.0001
V-r, 8803.76 ± 0.40−3.35<0.0001
Vancomycin, 8006.60 ± 0.66−0.51Not significant
FIG 3

Efficacy of V-r in reducing E. coli UTI89 burden in a 24-h thigh muscle infection model in neutropenic CD-1 mice.

TABLE 5

Efficacy of V-r in reducing E. coli UTI89 burden in 24-h thigh muscle infection model in neutropenic CD-1 mice

Group, total dose over 24 h (mg/kg)Log10 (group geometric mean ± SD CFU/g)Log10 change from vehicle (CFU/g)P value (versus vehicle)
Pretreatment4.76 ± 0.18−4.950.0248
Vehicle9.71 ± 0.1700
V-r, 2005.60 ± 2.28−4.110.0217
V-r, 4003.27 ± 1.88−6.43<0.0001
V-r, 7002.58 ± 0.25−7.13<0.0001
V-r, 1,0502.08 ± 0.89−7.63<0.0001
V-r, 1,4002.68 ± 1.38−7.03<0.0001
Vancomycin, 1,2728.48 ± 1.31−1.23Not significant
Ciprofloxacin, 203.32 ± 0.14−6.39<0.0007
Efficacy of V-r in reducing E. coli UTI89 burden in a 24-h thigh muscle infection model in neutropenic CD-1 mice. Efficacy of V-r in an E. coli ATCC 25922 thigh muscle infection model (9 h) in neutropenic CD-1 mice Efficacy of V-r in reducing E. coli UTI89 burden in 24-h thigh muscle infection model in neutropenic CD-1 mice The MIC data confirm previous findings that the coupling of arginine with vancomycin bestows significant antimicrobial activity of the V-r conjugate against E. coli infection while remaining effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (14). Such in vitro findings were effectively translated into thigh muscle infection models, where a total 24-h dose of 250 mg/kg V-r reduced E. coli burden to pretreatment (stasis) levels. Since area under the curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) is the primary PK/pharmacodynamic predictor of vancomycin (5), this static dose corresponds to a total AUC/MIC of 47.3. Based on a free (f) fraction of 35%, as determined in plasma protein binding studies (Table 1), the fAUC/MIC of V-r was 16.5. As an approximation of exposure using allometric scaling (22), this would be equivalent to a human dose of ∼20 mg/kg, with a dose of 28 mg/kg required to elicit an additional 1-log10 kill. Such allometric doses of V-r are in line with the daily and loading doses of vancomycin in humans (5). The positive efficacy data support the notion that the cationic feature of arginine within V-r allows for breaching of the stubborn outer membrane of E. coli isolates and possibly other Gram-negative bacteria (14). The sequelae of events leading to V-r-mediated E. coli eradication likely involve (i) improved cell surface association with negatively charged groups, (ii) effective translocation across the outer membrane leading to enhanced drug uptake, and (iii) disruption of peptidoglycan synthesis within the periplasmic space (6, 14). To our knowledge, the current findings describe the first report of a marked abrogation of E. coli burden in vivo with a minimally modified vancomycin-cationic transporter conjugate. Previously, it was reported that vancomycin-QC14, a strongly lipophilic/cationic molecule, reduced thigh muscle infection of a carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strain (23). Because V-r was highly effective in time-kill assays against E. coli NCTC 13441, a pandemic uropathogenic clone (24), a logical next step would be to evaluate the conjugate in a model of urinary tract infection (UTI). Based on the high renal elimination of vancomycin in humans (25) in a nonmetabolized form (26), it is reasonable to hypothesize that V-r may drive a highly targeted therapeutic intervention to combat E. coli-associated UTIs. These data further underscore a precedent for creating a novel Gram-negative active agent by transforming a commonly used and selective Gram-positive antibiotic by introducing certain cationic features through a simple and scalable synthesis protocol (14). Such an approach, in consort with effective in silico predictions (27, 28), might expedite antibiotic development and increase the overall probability of success of drug candidates. Most important, this would help to arrest the insidious pandemic of difficult-to-treat bacterial infections.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Mutation frequencies and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  J L Martinez; F Baquero
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro biological evaluation of novel broad-spectrum isothiazolone inhibitors of bacterial type II topoisomerases.

Authors:  Cédric Charrier; Anne-Marie Salisbury; Victoria J Savage; Emmanuel Moyo; Henry Forward; Nicola Ooi; Jonathan Cheung; Richard Metzger; David McGarry; Rolf Walker; Ian R Cooper; Andrew J Ratcliffe; Neil R Stokes
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Battle against Vancomycin-Resistant Bacteria: Recent Developments in Chemical Strategies.

Authors:  Geetika Dhanda; Paramita Sarkar; Sandip Samaddar; Jayanta Haldar
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Escherichia coli ST131, an intriguing clonal group.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine; Xavier Bertrand; Jean-Yves Madec
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Vancomycin-Arginine Conjugate Inhibits Growth of Carbapenem-Resistant E. coli and Targets Cell-Wall Synthesis.

Authors:  Alexandra Antonoplis; Xiaoyu Zang; Tristan Wegner; Paul A Wender; Lynette Cegelski
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  Predictive compound accumulation rules yield a broad-spectrum antibiotic.

Authors:  Michelle F Richter; Bryon S Drown; Andrew P Riley; Alfredo Garcia; Tomohiro Shirai; Riley L Svec; Paul J Hergenrother
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Discovery of a Novel Metallo-β-Lactamase Inhibitor That Potentiates Meropenem Activity against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Martin Everett; Nicolas Sprynski; Alicia Coelho; Jérôme Castandet; Maëlle Bayet; Juliette Bougnon; Clarisse Lozano; David T Davies; Simon Leiris; Magdalena Zalacain; Ian Morrissey; Sophie Magnet; Kirsty Holden; Peter Warn; Filomena De Luca; Jean-Denis Docquier; Marc Lemonnier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative efficacies of human simulated exposures of telavancin and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a range of vancomycin MICs in a murine pneumonia model.

Authors:  Jared L Crandon; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance.

Authors:  Anna Maria Peri; Yohei Doi; Brian A Potoski; Patrick N A Harris; David L Paterson; Elda Righi
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances.

Authors:  Irith Wiegand; Kai Hilpert; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification and Quantification of Glycans in Whole Cells: Architecture of Microalgal Polysaccharides Described by Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Alexandre Poulhazan; Malitha C Dickwella Widanage; Artur Muszyński; Alexandre A Arnold; Dror E Warschawski; Parastoo Azadi; Isabelle Marcotte; Tuo Wang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Vancomycin-arginine (STM-001) abrogates ESBL carrier and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli burden in a murine complicated urinary tract infection model.

Authors:  Lewis F Neville; Itamar Shalit; Peter A Warn; Jacob T Rendell
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 3.  Recent Advances in the Development of Semisynthetic Glycopeptide Antibiotics: 2014-2022.

Authors:  Emma van Groesen; Paolo Innocenti; Nathaniel I Martin
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.578

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.