Literature DB >> 33468459

Electrostatic-Mediated Affinity Tuning of Lysostaphin Accelerates Bacterial Lysis Kinetics and Enhances In Vivo Efficacy.

Hongliang Zhao1, Susan Eszterhas1,2, Jacob Furlon1, Hao Cheng3, Karl E Griswold4,5,6,3.   

Abstract

Drug-resistant bacterial pathogens are a serious threat to global health, and antibacterial lysins are at the forefront of innovative treatments for these life-threatening infections. While lysins' general mechanism of action is well understood, the design principles that might enable engineering of performance-enhanced variants are still being formulated. Here, we report a detailed analysis of molecular determinants underlying the in vivo efficacy of lysostaphin, a canonical anti-MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) lysin. Systematic analysis of bacterial binding, growth inhibition, lysis kinetics, and in vivo therapeutic efficacy revealed that binding affinity, and not inherent catalytic firepower, is the dominant driver of lysostaphin efficacy. This insight enabled electrostatic affinity tuning of lysostaphin to produce a single point mutant that manifested dramatically enhanced processivity and lysis kinetics and trended toward improved in vivo efficacy. More generally, these studies provide important insights into the complex relationships between lysin electrostatics, bacterial targeting, cell lysis efficiency, and in vivo efficacy. The lessons learned may enable engineering of other high-performance antibacterial biocatalysts.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIC; MRSA; affinity tuning; antibacterial lysin; electrostatic interaction; enzyme kinetics; in vivo efficacy; lysostaphin; minimal inhibitory concentration; protein engineering

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468459      PMCID: PMC8097437          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02199-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  44 in total

1.  Removal of endotoxin from recombinant protein preparations.

Authors:  S Liu; R Tobias; S McClure; G Styba; Q Shi; G Jackowski
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Comparison of four methods for determining lysostaphin susceptibility of various strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Caroline M Kusuma; John F Kokai-Kun
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Exebacase for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and endocarditis.

Authors:  Vance G Fowler; Anita F Das; Joy Lipka-Diamond; Raymond Schuch; Roger Pomerantz; Luis Jáuregui-Peredo; Adam Bressler; David Evans; Gregory J Moran; Mark E Rupp; Robert Wise; G Ralph Corey; Marcus Zervos; Pamela S Douglas; Cara Cassino
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Target cell specificity of a bacteriocin molecule: a C-terminal signal directs lysostaphin to the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Baba; O Schneewind
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Improving the lethal effect of cpl-7, a pneumococcal phage lysozyme with broad bactericidal activity, by inverting the net charge of its cell wall-binding module.

Authors:  Roberto Díez-Martínez; Héctor D de Paz; Héctor de Paz; Noemí Bustamante; Ernesto García; Margarita Menéndez; Pedro García
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Deimmunized Lysostaphin Synergizes with Small-Molecule Chemotherapies and Resensitizes Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics.

Authors:  Yongliang Fang; Jack R Kirsch; Liang Li; Seth A Brooks; Spencer Heim; Cynthia Tan; Susan Eszterhas; Hao D Cheng; Hongliang Zhao; Yan Q Xiong; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Globally deimmunized lysostaphin evades human immune surveillance and enables highly efficacious repeat dosing.

Authors:  Hongliang Zhao; Seth A Brooks; Susan Eszterhas; Spencer Heim; Liang Li; Yan Q Xiong; Yongliang Fang; Jack R Kirsch; Deeptak Verma; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Bioengineered lysozyme reduces bacterial burden and inflammation in a murine model of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

Authors:  Charlotte C Teneback; Thomas C Scanlon; Matthew J Wargo; Jenna L Bement; Karl E Griswold; Laurie W Leclair
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
.

Authors:  Will A McGuinness; Natalia Malachowa; Frank R DeLeo
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2017-06-23

Review 10.  Phage-Derived Peptidoglycan Degrading Enzymes: Challenges and Future Prospects for In Vivo Therapy.

Authors:  Hugo Oliveira; Carlos São-José; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.048

View more
  1 in total

1.  Electrostatic Interaction with the Bacterial Cell Envelope Tunes the Lytic Activity of Two Novel Peptidoglycan Hydrolases.

Authors:  Alicja Wysocka; Łukasz Łężniak; Elżbieta Jagielska; Izabela Sabała
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.