Petri Mäkelä1, Si Min Zhang1, Sean G Rudd2. 1. Science For Life Laboratory, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Science For Life Laboratory, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. sean.rudd@scilifelab.se.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Combinations of pharmacological agents are essential for disease control and prevention, offering many advantages over monotherapies, with one of these being drug synergy. The state-of-the-art method to profile drug synergy in preclinical research is by using dose-response matrices in disease-appropriate models, however this approach is frequently labour intensive and cost-ineffective, particularly when performed in a medium- to high-throughput fashion. Thus, in this study, we set out to optimise a parameter of this methodology, determining the minimal matrix size that can be used to robustly detect and quantify synergy between two drugs. RESULTS: We used a drug matrix reduction workflow that allowed the identification of a minimal drug matrix capable of robustly detecting and quantifying drug synergy. These minimal matrices utilise substantially less reagents and data processing power than their typically used larger counterparts. Focusing on the antileukemic efficacy of the chemotherapy combination of cytarabine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase, we could show that detection and quantification of drug synergy by three common synergy models was well-tolerated despite reducing matrix size from 8 × 8 to 4 × 4. Overall, the optimisation of drug synergy scoring as presented here could inform future medium- to high-throughput drug synergy screening strategies in pre-clinical research.
OBJECTIVE: Combinations of pharmacological agents are essential for disease control and prevention, offering many advantages over monotherapies, with one of these being drug synergy. The state-of-the-art method to profile drug synergy in preclinical research is by using dose-response matrices in disease-appropriate models, however this approach is frequently labour intensive and cost-ineffective, particularly when performed in a medium- to high-throughput fashion. Thus, in this study, we set out to optimise a parameter of this methodology, determining the minimal matrix size that can be used to robustly detect and quantify synergy between two drugs. RESULTS: We used a drug matrix reduction workflow that allowed the identification of a minimal drug matrix capable of robustly detecting and quantifying drug synergy. These minimal matrices utilise substantially less reagents and data processing power than their typically used larger counterparts. Focusing on the antileukemic efficacy of the chemotherapy combination of cytarabine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase, we could show that detection and quantification of drug synergy by three common synergy models was well-tolerated despite reducing matrix size from 8 × 8 to 4 × 4. Overall, the optimisation of drug synergy scoring as presented here could inform future medium- to high-throughput drug synergy screening strategies in pre-clinical research.
Authors: Susan L Holbeck; Richard Camalier; James A Crowell; Jeevan Prasaad Govindharajulu; Melinda Hollingshead; Lawrence W Anderson; Eric Polley; Larry Rubinstein; Apurva Srivastava; Deborah Wilsker; Jerry M Collins; James H Doroshow Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nikolas Herold; Sean G Rudd; Linda Ljungblad; Kumar Sanjiv; Ida Hed Myrberg; Cynthia B J Paulin; Yaser Heshmati; Anna Hagenkort; Juliane Kutzner; Brent D G Page; José M Calderón-Montaño; Olga Loseva; Ann-Sofie Jemth; Lorenzo Bulli; Hanna Axelsson; Bianca Tesi; Nicholas C K Valerie; Andreas Höglund; Julia Bladh; Elisée Wiita; Mikael Sundin; Michael Uhlin; Georgios Rassidakis; Mats Heyman; Katja Pokrovskaja Tamm; Ulrika Warpman-Berglund; Julian Walfridsson; Sören Lehmann; Dan Grandér; Thomas Lundbäck; Per Kogner; Jan-Inge Henter; Thomas Helleday; Torsten Schaller Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jennifer O'Neil; Yair Benita; Igor Feldman; Melissa Chenard; Brian Roberts; Yaping Liu; Jing Li; Astrid Kral; Serguei Lejnine; Andrey Loboda; William Arthur; Razvan Cristescu; Brian B Haines; Christopher Winter; Theresa Zhang; Andrew Bloecher; Stuart D Shumway Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Sophia Ceder; Sofi E Eriksson; Ying Yu Liang; Emarndeena H Cheteh; Si Min Zhang; Kenji M Fujihara; Julie Bianchi; Vladimir J N Bykov; Lars Abrahmsen; Nicholas J Clemons; Pär Nordlund; Sean G Rudd; Klas G Wiman Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 9.685