Haiming Fang1,2, Lian Fu3,4, Xuejun Li5, Chunxia Lu3,4, Yuan Su3,4, Kangwei Xiong3,4, Lijiu Zhang3,4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. haimingfang@ahmu.edu.cn. 2. Center for Gut Microbiota Research, Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. haimingfang@ahmu.edu.cn. 3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. 4. Center for Gut Microbiota Research, Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Second Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of monotherapy with a single fresh fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for recurrent ulcerative colitis (UC). RESULTS:Twenty-six eligible patients were enrolled, and 6 patients were excluded. Ultimately, 20 patients were randomized to the FMTgroup (n = 10) and the control group (n = 10); 80% were females (F/M = 16/4), the mean age was 48 ± 14 years, and the mean duration was 6.4 ± 8.2 years. The mean length of post-FMT follow-up was 19.1 ± 10.1 months (6-38). No statistically significant differences in baseline demographic or clinical characteristics were found between the groups. Ninety percent of patients in the FMT group and 50% of patients in the control group met the primary endpoint at week 8. The Mayo score was significantly decreased compared with that of the control group (n = 10) when reassessed at week 4 (P = 0.001) and week 8 (P = 0.019) after FMT; there was no significant difference 6 months after treatment. The median remission time was 24 months (95% CI 68.26-131.7%) in both the FMT (range 6-38 months) and control groups (range 7-35 months), with no significant difference (P = 0.895). Participants tolerated FMT treatment, and no adverse events occurred during long-term follow-up, with one treatment-related significant adverse event (EBV infection) occurring within 2 weeks after FMT. Stool microbiota composition analysis indicated improved gut microbiota diversity after FMT, with expansion of stool-donor taxa. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla of the gut microbiota in active UC patients. The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes decreased and that of Proteobacteria increased significantly in active UC patients compared with donors, while Firmicutes showed no significant changes. A single fresh FMT could effectively reconstruct the gut microbiota composition in patients with active UC and maintain stability, with increased Bacteroidetes and decreased Proteobacteria abundance. FMT significantly reduced the relative abundance of Escherichia and increased the relative abundance of Prevotella at the genus level. Pyruvate metabolism, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, and pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis showed significant differences after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS:Monotherapy with a single fresh FMT is an effective and safe strategy to induce long-term remission without drugs in patients with active UC and may be an alternative induction therapy for recurrent UC or even primary UC.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of monotherapy with a single fresh fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for recurrent ulcerative colitis (UC). RESULTS: Twenty-six eligible patients were enrolled, and 6 patients were excluded. Ultimately, 20 patients were randomized to the FMT group (n = 10) and the control group (n = 10); 80% were females (F/M = 16/4), the mean age was 48 ± 14 years, and the mean duration was 6.4 ± 8.2 years. The mean length of post-FMT follow-up was 19.1 ± 10.1 months (6-38). No statistically significant differences in baseline demographic or clinical characteristics were found between the groups. Ninety percent of patients in the FMT group and 50% of patients in the control group met the primary endpoint at week 8. The Mayo score was significantly decreased compared with that of the control group (n = 10) when reassessed at week 4 (P = 0.001) and week 8 (P = 0.019) after FMT; there was no significant difference 6 months after treatment. The median remission time was 24 months (95% CI 68.26-131.7%) in both the FMT (range 6-38 months) and control groups (range 7-35 months), with no significant difference (P = 0.895). Participants tolerated FMT treatment, and no adverse events occurred during long-term follow-up, with one treatment-related significant adverse event (EBV infection) occurring within 2 weeks after FMT. Stool microbiota composition analysis indicated improved gut microbiota diversity after FMT, with expansion of stool-donor taxa. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla of the gut microbiota in active UC patients. The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes decreased and that of Proteobacteria increased significantly in active UC patients compared with donors, while Firmicutes showed no significant changes. A single fresh FMT could effectively reconstruct the gut microbiota composition in patients with active UC and maintain stability, with increased Bacteroidetes and decreased Proteobacteria abundance. FMT significantly reduced the relative abundance of Escherichia and increased the relative abundance of Prevotella at the genus level. Pyruvate metabolism, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, and pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis showed significant differences after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with a single fresh FMT is an effective and safe strategy to induce long-term remission without drugs in patients with active UC and may be an alternative induction therapy for recurrent UC or even primary UC.
Authors: Benjamin H Mullish; Mohammed Nabil Quraishi; Jonathan P Segal; Victoria L McCune; Melissa Baxter; Gemma L Marsden; David J Moore; Alaric Colville; Neeraj Bhala; Tariq H Iqbal; Christopher Settle; Graziella Kontkowski; Ailsa L Hart; Peter M Hawkey; Simon D Goldenberg; Horace R T Williams Journal: Gut Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Manasi Agrawal; Olga C Aroniadis; Lawrence J Brandt; Colleen Kelly; Sarah Freeman; Christina Surawicz; Elizabeth Broussard; Neil Stollman; Andrea Giovanelli; Becky Smith; Eugene Yen; Apurva Trivedi; Levi Hubble; Dina Kao; Thomas Borody; Sarah Finlayson; Arnab Ray; Robert Smith Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Gary D Wu; Jun Chen; Christian Hoffmann; Kyle Bittinger; Ying-Yu Chen; Sue A Keilbaugh; Meenakshi Bewtra; Dan Knights; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Rohini Sinha; Erin Gilroy; Kernika Gupta; Robert Baldassano; Lisa Nessel; Hongzhe Li; Frederic D Bushman; James D Lewis Journal: Science Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Andreas Stallmach; Philip Grunert; Johannes Stallhofer; Bettina Löffler; Michael Baier; Jürgen Rödel; Michael Kiehntopf; Sophie Neugebauer; Dietmar H Pieper; Howard Junca; Andrea Tannapfel; Ute Merkel; Ulrike Schumacher; Maria Breternitz-Gruhne; Tabitha Heller; Anja Schauer; Michael Hartmann; Arndt Steube Journal: Trials Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Manuel Ponce-Alonso; Carlota García-Hoz; Ana Halperin; Javier Nuño; Pilar Nicolás; Adolfo Martínez-Pérez; Juan Ocaña; Juan Carlos García-Pérez; Antonio Guerrero; Antonio López-Sanromán; Rafael Cantón; Garbiñe Roy; Rosa Del Campo Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 7.561