E Jansen1,2, C G Russell3, J Appleton4,5, R Byrne6,7, L A Daniels6, C Fowler5,8, C Rossiter8, K M Mallan9. 1. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia. elena.jansen@jhmi.edu. 2. Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. elena.jansen@jhmi.edu. 3. CASS Food Research Centre, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. 4. Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, 88 Mallett St, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. 5. Tresillian Family Care Centres, McKenzie Street, Belmore, Sydney, NSW, 2192, Australia. 6. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia. 7. Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, 62 Graham St, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. 8. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia. 9. School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, QLD, 4014, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In order to measure and understand trajectories of parental feeding practices and their relationship with child eating and weight, it is desirable to perform assessment from infancy and across time, in age-appropriate ways. While many feeding practices questionnaires exist, none is presently available that enables tracking of feeding practices from infancy through childhood. The aim of the study was to develop a version of the Feeding Practices and Structure Questionnaire (FPSQ) for parents with infants and toddlers (< 2 years) to be used in conjunction with the original FPSQ for older children (≥2 years) to measure feeding practices related to non-responsiveness and structure across childhood. METHODS: Constructs and items for the FPSQ for infants and toddlers were derived from the existing and validated FPSQ for older children and supplemented by a review of the literature on infant feeding questionnaires. Following expert review, two versions of the questionnaire were developed, one for milk feeding parents and one for solid feeding parents. Data from two studies were combined (child ages 0-24 months) to test the derived constructs with Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the milk feeding (N = 731) and solid feeding (N = 611) versions. RESULTS: The milk feeding version consisted of four factors (18 items) and showed acceptable model fit and good internal reliability: 'feeding on demand vs. feeding routine' (α = 0.87), 'using food to calm' (α = 0.87), 'persuasive feeding' (α = 0.71), 'parent-led feeding' (α = 0.79). The same four factors showed acceptable model fit for the solid feeding version (21 items), likewise with good internal reliability (α = 0.74, 0.86, 0.85, 0.84 respectively). Two additional factors (13 items) were developed for the solid feeding version that appeared developmentally appropriate only for children aged 12 months or older: 'family meal environment' (α = 0.81) and 'using (non-)food rewards' (α = 0.92). The majority of factor-factor correlations were in line with those of the original FPSQ. CONCLUSIONS: The FPSQ milk and solid feeding versions are the first measures specifically developed as precursors to the FPSQ to measure parental feeding practices in children < 2 years, particularly practices related to non-responsiveness and structure. Further validation in more diverse samples is required.
BACKGROUND: In order to measure and understand trajectories of parental feeding practices and their relationship with child eating and weight, it is desirable to perform assessment from infancy and across time, in age-appropriate ways. While many feeding practices questionnaires exist, none is presently available that enables tracking of feeding practices from infancy through childhood. The aim of the study was to develop a version of the Feeding Practices and Structure Questionnaire (FPSQ) for parents with infants and toddlers (< 2 years) to be used in conjunction with the original FPSQ for older children (≥2 years) to measure feeding practices related to non-responsiveness and structure across childhood. METHODS: Constructs and items for the FPSQ for infants and toddlers were derived from the existing and validated FPSQ for older children and supplemented by a review of the literature on infant feeding questionnaires. Following expert review, two versions of the questionnaire were developed, one for milk feeding parents and one for solid feeding parents. Data from two studies were combined (child ages 0-24 months) to test the derived constructs with Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the milk feeding (N = 731) and solid feeding (N = 611) versions. RESULTS: The milk feeding version consisted of four factors (18 items) and showed acceptable model fit and good internal reliability: 'feeding on demand vs. feeding routine' (α = 0.87), 'using food to calm' (α = 0.87), 'persuasive feeding' (α = 0.71), 'parent-led feeding' (α = 0.79). The same four factors showed acceptable model fit for the solid feeding version (21 items), likewise with good internal reliability (α = 0.74, 0.86, 0.85, 0.84 respectively). Two additional factors (13 items) were developed for the solid feeding version that appeared developmentally appropriate only for children aged 12 months or older: 'family meal environment' (α = 0.81) and 'using (non-)food rewards' (α = 0.92). The majority of factor-factor correlations were in line with those of the original FPSQ. CONCLUSIONS: The FPSQ milk and solid feeding versions are the first measures specifically developed as precursors to the FPSQ to measure parental feeding practices in children < 2 years, particularly practices related to non-responsiveness and structure. Further validation in more diverse samples is required.
Authors: Amber E Vaughn; Dianne S Ward; Jennifer O Fisher; Myles S Faith; Sheryl O Hughes; Stef P J Kremers; Dara R Musher-Eizenman; Teresia M O'Connor; Heather Patrick; Thomas G Power Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2016-01-02 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Marjolein N Kooijman; Claudia J Kruithof; Cornelia M van Duijn; Liesbeth Duijts; Oscar H Franco; Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Johan C de Jongste; Caroline C W Klaver; Aad van der Lugt; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Robin P Peeters; Hein Raat; Edmond H H M Rings; Fernando Rivadeneira; Marc P van der Schroeff; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Eppo Wolvius; Janine F Felix; Vincent W V Jaddoe Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Richard Ball; Kerith Duncanson; Lee Ashton; Andrew Bailey; Tracy L Burrows; Gail Whiteford; Maria Henström; Rachel Gerathy; Alison Walton; Jennifer Wehlow; Clare E Collins Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Catherine G Russell; Jessica Appleton; Alissa J Burnett; Chris Rossiter; Cathrine Fowler; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson; Elena Jansen Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2021-12-24