Amy Wheldrake1, Estelle Guillemois1, Hamidreza Arouni1, Vera Chetty1, Stephen J Russell2. 1. Nonwovens Innovation & Research Institute Ltd, 169 Meanwood Road, Leeds, LS7 1SR, West Yorkshire, UK. 2. Nonwovens Innovation & Research Institute Ltd, 169 Meanwood Road, Leeds, LS7 1SR, West Yorkshire, UK. stephenr@nonwovens-innovation.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are expected to last for at least 3 years, but whilst this may be achieved from an insecticidal perspective, physical protection is frequently compromised much earlier because of the rapid accumulation of holes during use. To understand why LLINs are so susceptible to loss of physical integrity, thousands of hole damage sites in LLINs retrieved from the field in Africa and Asia were forensically studied to identify the persistent underlying causes. METHODS: A total of 525 LLINs consisting of six different brands from five different countries across Africa and Asia were collected from the field after 1 to 3 years in use. More than 42,000 individual sites of hole damage were analysed based on the morphology and size of each individual hole, aided by optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The fracture morphology enabled positive identification of the underlying mechanisms of the damage. RESULTS: Across all LLINs and geographical settings, mechanical damage is the primary cause of holes and loss of physical integrity in LLINs (63.14% by frequency and 81.52% by area). Snagging is the single most frequent mechanical damage mechanism, whilst the largest sized holes in LLINs result from seam failure and tearing. Abrasion and hole enlargement are also responsible for a progressive loss in the physical integrity of nets. Collectively, these five modes of mechanical damage can be expected to result from normal use of LLINs by households. Evidence of deliberate cutting, burn holes and rodent damage was observed to a lesser degree, which LLINs are not designed to withstand. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of physical integrity in LLINs is an inevitable consequence of using a vector control product that has an inherently low resistance to mechanical damage during normal use. To improve performance, new specifications based on laboratory textile testing is needed, to assess the resistance of LLIN products to the primary causes of mechanical damage when in use, which are snagging, tearing, abrasion and hole enlargement. Seam construction also needs to meet a revised minimum standard to reduce the risk of a rapid loss of physical integrity during use.
BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are expected to last for at least 3 years, but whilst this may be achieved from an insecticidal perspective, physical protection is frequently compromised much earlier because of the rapid accumulation of holes during use. To understand why LLINs are so susceptible to loss of physical integrity, thousands of hole damage sites in LLINs retrieved from the field in Africa and Asia were forensically studied to identify the persistent underlying causes. METHODS: A total of 525 LLINs consisting of six different brands from five different countries across Africa and Asia were collected from the field after 1 to 3 years in use. More than 42,000 individual sites of hole damage were analysed based on the morphology and size of each individual hole, aided by optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The fracture morphology enabled positive identification of the underlying mechanisms of the damage. RESULTS: Across all LLINs and geographical settings, mechanical damage is the primary cause of holes and loss of physical integrity in LLINs (63.14% by frequency and 81.52% by area). Snagging is the single most frequent mechanical damage mechanism, whilst the largest sized holes in LLINs result from seam failure and tearing. Abrasion and hole enlargement are also responsible for a progressive loss in the physical integrity of nets. Collectively, these five modes of mechanical damage can be expected to result from normal use of LLINs by households. Evidence of deliberate cutting, burn holes and rodent damage was observed to a lesser degree, which LLINs are not designed to withstand. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of physical integrity in LLINs is an inevitable consequence of using a vector control product that has an inherently low resistance to mechanical damage during normal use. To improve performance, new specifications based on laboratory textile testing is needed, to assess the resistance of LLIN products to the primary causes of mechanical damage when in use, which are snagging, tearing, abrasion and hole enlargement. Seam construction also needs to meet a revised minimum standard to reduce the risk of a rapid loss of physical integrity during use.
Authors: Stravensky T Boussougou-Sambe; Parfait Awono-Ambene; Geraud C T Tasse; Josiane Etang; Jerome A Binyang; Lynda D Nouage; Gaston Wamba; Peter Enyong; Eric B Fokam Journal: Malar J Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Lena M Lorenz; Hans J Overgaard; Dennis J Massue; Zawadi D Mageni; John Bradley; Jason D Moore; Renata Mandike; Karen Kramer; William Kisinza; Sarah J Moore Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-12-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Dennis J Massue; Sarah J Moore; Zawadi D Mageni; Jason D Moore; John Bradley; Olivier Pigeon; Erasto J Maziba; Renata Mandike; Karen Kramer; William N Kisinza; Hans J Overgaard; Lena M Lorenz Journal: Malar J Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Kobié H Toé; Frank Mechan; Julie-Anne A Tangena; Marion Morris; Joanna Solino; Emile F S Tchicaya; Alphonse Traoré; Hanafy Ismail; James Maas; Natalie Lissenden; Margaret Pinder; Steve W Lindsay; Alfred B Tiono; Hilary Ranson; N'Falé Sagnon Journal: Malar J Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Peter W Gething; Samir Bhatt; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Caitlin A Bever; Hannah Koenker; Daniel J Weiss; Camilo Vargas-Ruiz; Anita K Nandi; Harry S Gibson; Joseph Harris; Katherine E Battle; Susan F Rumisha; Suzanne Keddie; Punam Amratia; Rohan Arambepola; Ewan Cameron; Elisabeth G Chestnutt; Emma L Collins; Justin Millar; Swapnil Mishra; Jennifer Rozier; Tasmin Symons; Katherine A Twohig; T Deirdre Hollingsworth Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 14.919