Literature DB >> 33467957

A phase I trial evaluating the effects of plerixafor, G-CSF, and azacitidine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Eric Huselton1, Michael P Rettig2, Theresa Fletcher2, Julie Ritchey2, Leah Gehrs2, Kyle McFarland2, Stephanie Christ2, William C Eades2, Kathryn Trinkaus2, Rizwan Romee3, Shashikant Kulkarni4, Armin Ghobadi2, Camille Abboud2, Amanda F Cashen2, Keith Stockerl-Goldstein2, Geoffrey L Uy2, Ravi Vij2, Peter Westervelt2, John F DiPersio2, Mark A Schroeder2.   

Abstract

Interactions between the bone marrow microenvironment and MDS tumor clones play a role in pathogenesis and response to treatment. We hypothesized G-CSF and plerixafor may enhance sensitivity to azacitidine in MDS. Twenty-eight patients with MDS were treated with plerixafor, G-CSF and azacitidine with a standard 3 + 3 design. Subjects received G-CSF 10 mcg/kg D1-D8, plerixafor D4-D8, and azacitidine 75 mg/m2 D4-D8, but the trial was amended to reduce G-CSF dose to 5 mcg/kg for 5 days after 2 patients had significant leukocytosis. Plerixafor was dose escalated to 560 mcg/kg/day without dose limiting toxicity. Two complete responses and 6 marrow responses were seen for an overall response rate (ORR) of 36% in evaluable patients, and ORR of 53% in patients receiving the triplet. Evidence of mobilization correlated with a higher ORR, 60% vs. 17%. Plerixafor, G-CSF and azacitidine appears tolerable when given over 5 days and has encouraging response rates.KEY POINTSPlerixafor and G-CSF can be safely combined with azacitidine for 5 days in patients with MDS.The overall response rate of 53% for evaluable patients with this regimen is higher than expected and more responses were seen in patients with blast mobilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-CSF; MDS; Plerixafor; azacitidine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33467957      PMCID: PMC8178174          DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1872068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  39 in total

1.  A randomized study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor applied during and after chemotherapy in patients with poor risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from the HOVON Cooperative Group. Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group.

Authors:  G J Ossenkoppele; B van der Holt; G E Verhoef; S M Daenen; L F Verdonck; P Sonneveld; P W Wijermans; J van der Lelie; W L van Putten; B Löwenberg
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Mobilization of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell donors with intravenous plerixafor mobilizes a unique graft.

Authors:  Mark A Schroeder; Michael P Rettig; Sandra Lopez; Stephanie Christ; Mark Fiala; William Eades; Fazia A Mir; Jin Shao; Kyle McFarland; Kathryn Trinkaus; William Shannon; Elena Deych; Jinsheng Yu; Ravi Vij; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Amanda F Cashen; Geoffrey L Uy; Camille N Abboud; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  CXCR4 is a prognostic marker in acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Anke C Spoo; Michael Lübbert; William G Wierda; Jan A Burger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of filgrastim in remission induction and consolidation therapy for adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. The International Acute Myeloid Leukemia Study Group.

Authors:  G Heil; D Hoelzer; M A Sanz; K Lechner; J A Liu Yin; G Papa; L Noens; J Szer; A Ganser; C O'Brien; J Matcham; A Barge
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Pathobiology, classification, and diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Ghulam J Mufti
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.

Authors:  Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Carlo Finelli; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Robert Schoch; Norbert Gattermann; Guillermo Sanz; Alan List; Steven D Gore; John F Seymour; John M Bennett; John Byrd; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; Cl Beach; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Targeting the leukemia microenvironment by CXCR4 inhibition overcomes resistance to kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in AML.

Authors:  Zhihong Zeng; Yue Xi Shi; Ismael J Samudio; Rui-Yu Wang; Xiaoyang Ling; Olga Frolova; Mark Levis; Joshua B Rubin; Robert R Negrin; Elihu H Estey; Sergej Konoplev; Michael Andreeff; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Chemosensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following mobilization by the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100.

Authors:  Bruno Nervi; Pablo Ramirez; Michael P Rettig; Geoffrey L Uy; Matthew S Holt; Julie K Ritchey; Julie L Prior; David Piwnica-Worms; Gary Bridger; Timothy J Ley; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Leukemic cells create bone marrow niches that disrupt the behavior of normal hematopoietic progenitor cells.

Authors:  Angela Colmone; Maria Amorim; Andrea L Pontier; Sheng Wang; Elizabeth Jablonski; Dorothy A Sipkins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Phase I trial of plerixafor combined with decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Gail J Roboz; Ellen K Ritchie; Yulia Dault; Linda Lam; Danielle C Marshall; Nicole M Cruz; Hsiao-Ting C Hsu; Duane C Hassane; Paul J Christos; Cindy Ippoliti; Joseph M Scandura; Monica L Guzman
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.