Literature DB >> 33467653

Use of Low-Dose Tamoxifen to Increase Mammographic Screening Sensitivity in Premenopausal Women.

Mikael Eriksson1, Kamila Czene1, Emily F Conant2, Per Hall1,3.   

Abstract

Increased breast density decreases mammographic sensitivity due to masking of cancers by dense tissue. Tamoxifen exposure reduces mammographic density and, therefore, should improve screening sensitivity. We modelled how low-dose tamoxifen exposure could be used to increase mammographic sensitivity. Mammographic sensitivity was calculated using the KARMA prospective screening cohort. Two models were fitted to estimate screening sensitivity and detected tumor size based on baseline mammographic density. BI-RADS-dependent sensitivity was estimated. The results of the 2.5 mg tamoxifen arm of the KARISMA trial were used to define expected changes in mammographic density after six months exposure and to predict changes in mammographic screening sensitivity and detected tumor size. Rates of interval cancers and detection of invasive tumors were estimated for women with mammographic density relative decreases by 10-50%. In all, 517 cancers in premenopausal women were diagnosed in KARMA: 287 (56%) screen-detected and 230 (44%) interval cancers. Screening sensitivities prior to tamoxifen, were 76%, 69%, 53%, and 46% for BI-RADS density categories A, B, C, and D, respectively. After exposure to tamoxifen, modelled screening sensitivities were estimated to increase by 0% (p = 0.35), 2% (p < 0.01), 5% (p < 0.01), and 5% (p < 0.01), respectively. An estimated relative density decrease by ≥20% resulted in an estimated reduction of interval cancers by 24% (p < 0.01) and reduction in tumors >20 mm at detection by 4% (p < 0.01). Low-dose tamoxifen has the potential to increase mammographic screening sensitivity and thereby reduce the proportion of interval cancers and larger screen-detected cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; low dose tamoxifen; mammography screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33467653      PMCID: PMC7830894          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  24 in total

1.  Look before you leap: stratify before you standardize.

Authors:  B C Choi; N A de Guia; P Walsh
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Breast-cancer screening--viewpoint of the IARC Working Group.

Authors:  Béatrice Lauby-Secretan; Chiara Scoccianti; Dana Loomis; Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Véronique Bouvard; Franca Bianchini; Kurt Straif
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Risk-reducing medications for primary breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Annabel Goodwin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-29

4.  Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Ronald E Gangnon; Veronica Burt; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Robert D Wellman; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Olivier Alonzo-Proulx; Taghreed I Alshafeiy; James T Patrie; Jennifer A Harvey; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Stromal characteristics may hold the key to mammographic density: the evidence to date.

Authors:  Alastair J Ironside; J Louise Jones
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24

7.  Determinants of Mammographic Density Change.

Authors:  Shadi Azam; Arvid Sjölander; Mikael Eriksson; Marike Gabrielson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen to Prevent Local and Contralateral Recurrence in Breast Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Andrea DeCensi; Matteo Puntoni; Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga; Silvia Caviglia; Franca Avino; Laura Cortesi; Cristiana Taverniti; Maria Grazia Pacquola; Fabio Falcini; Marcella Gulisano; Maria Digennaro; Anna Cariello; Katia Cagossi; Graziella Pinotti; Matteo Lazzeroni; Davide Serrano; Daniela Branchi; Sara Campora; Marilena Petrera; Tania Buttiron Webber; Luca Boni; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: extended long-term follow-up of the IBIS-I breast cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; Simon Cawthorn; Hisham Hamed; Kaija Holli; Anthony Howell; John F Forbes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Early detection of breast cancer rectifies inequality of breast cancer outcomes.

Authors:  László Tabár; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Peter B Dean; Robert A Smith; Håkan Jonsson; Sven Törnberg; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; May Mei-Sheng Ku; Wendy Yi-Ying Wu; Chen-Yang Hsu; Yu-Ching Chen; Gunilla Svane; Edward Azavedo; Helene Grundström; Per Sundén; Karin Leifland; Ewa Frodis; Joakim Ramos; Birgitta Epstein; Anders Åkerlund; Ann Sundbom; Pál Bordás; Hans Wallin; Leena Starck; Annika Björkgren; Stina Carlson; Irma Fredriksson; Johan Ahlgren; Daniel Öhman; Lars Holmberg; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Initiation and tolerance of chemoprevention among women with high-risk breast lesions: the potential of low-dose tamoxifen.

Authors:  Brittany Bychkovsky; Alison Laws; Fisher Katlin; Marybeth Hans; Mary Knust Graichen; Lydia E Pace; Rochelle Scheib; Judy E Garber; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.624

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.