| Literature DB >> 33467460 |
Felicitas Oberndorfer1, Sarah Moling2, Leonie Annika Hagelkruys1, Christoph Grimm2,3, Stephan Polterauer2,3, Alina Sturdza4, Stefanie Aust2, Alexander Reinthaller2,3, Leonhard Müllauer1, Richard Schwameis2,3.
Abstract
Recently, guidelines for endometrial cancer (EC) were released that guide treatment decisions according to the tumors' molecular profiles. To date, no real-world data regarding the clinical feasibility of molecular profiling have been released. This retrospective, monocentric study investigated the clinical feasibility of molecular profiling and its potential impact on treatment decisions. Tumor specimens underwent molecular profiling (testing for genetic alterations, (immune-)histological examination of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and L1CAM) as part of the clinical routine and were classified according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) classification system and to an integrated molecular risk stratification. Shifts between risk groups and potential treatment alterations are described. A total of 60 cases were included, of which twelve were excluded (20%), and eight of the remaining 48 were not characterized (drop-out rate of 16.7%). Molecular profiling revealed 4, 6, 25, and 5 patients with DNA polymerase-epsilon mutation, microsatellite instability, no specific molecular profile, and TP53 mutation, respectively. Three patients had substantial LVSI, and four patients showed high L1CAM expression. Molecular profiling took a median of 18.5 days. Substantial shifts occurred between the classification systems: four patients were upstaged, and 19 patients were downstaged. Molecular profiling of EC specimens is feasible in a daily routine, and new risk classification systems will change treatment decisions substantially.Entities:
Keywords: cancer gene panel sequencing; endometrial cancer; molecular tumor classification
Year: 2021 PMID: 33467460 PMCID: PMC7830511 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11010048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426