BACKGROUND: History has recorded the tremendous concerns and apprehension expressed by African Americans about participating in research studies. This review enumerates the collaborative techniques that were utilized by the Jackson State University (JSU) Jackson Heart Study (JHS) community-focused team to facilitate recruitment and retention of the JHS cohort and to implement health education and health promotion in the JHS communities. METHODS: This review describes the evolution of the JSU JHS community initiatives, an innovative community-driven operation, during the period 1999-2018. RESULTS: JSU JHS community-focused investigators published approximately 20 manuscripts, including community-led research and publications with community lead authors and co-authors, research and publications in collaboration with other JHS staff, through other JSU-funded projects. The JSU JHS community-focused unit also initiated the JHS Community Training Activities, developed the Community Health Advisory Network (CHAN), and trained and certified 137 Community Health Advisors. In addition, the JSU JHS community-focused unit developed the Collaborative Community Science Model (CCSM) that symbolized its approach to community engagement and outreach, and a Trust Scale for ascertaining African Americans' willingness to engage in biomedical research collaborations. CONCLUSION: This review offers educators, public health professionals, and research investigators a useful starting point for the development, selection, or improvement of techniques to motivate, inspire, and engage community residents in a community-academia partnership that yielded maximum benefits in the areas of health education, health promotion and interventions, and biomedical research. Substantial, meaningful community engagement is possible when prioritizing elimination of health disparities and long-term improvement in health care access in the target populations.
BACKGROUND: History has recorded the tremendous concerns and apprehension expressed by African Americans about participating in research studies. This review enumerates the collaborative techniques that were utilized by the Jackson State University (JSU) Jackson Heart Study (JHS) community-focused team to facilitate recruitment and retention of the JHS cohort and to implement health education and health promotion in the JHS communities. METHODS: This review describes the evolution of the JSU JHS community initiatives, an innovative community-driven operation, during the period 1999-2018. RESULTS: JSU JHS community-focused investigators published approximately 20 manuscripts, including community-led research and publications with community lead authors and co-authors, research and publications in collaboration with other JHS staff, through other JSU-funded projects. The JSU JHS community-focused unit also initiated the JHS Community Training Activities, developed the Community Health Advisory Network (CHAN), and trained and certified 137 Community Health Advisors. In addition, the JSU JHS community-focused unit developed the Collaborative Community Science Model (CCSM) that symbolized its approach to community engagement and outreach, and a Trust Scale for ascertaining African Americans' willingness to engage in biomedical research collaborations. CONCLUSION: This review offers educators, public health professionals, and research investigators a useful starting point for the development, selection, or improvement of techniques to motivate, inspire, and engage community residents in a community-academia partnership that yielded maximum benefits in the areas of health education, health promotion and interventions, and biomedical research. Substantial, meaningful community engagement is possible when prioritizing elimination of health disparities and long-term improvement in health care access in the target populations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Jackson Heart Study; community-based participatory research; engagement; partnership; recruitment and retention
Authors: Sharon B Wyatt; David R Williams; Rosie Calvin; Frances C Henderson; Evelyn R Walker; Karen Winters Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Gina Moreno-John; Anthony Gachie; Candace M Fleming; Anna Nápoles-Springer; Elizabeth Mutran; Spero M Manson; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2004-11
Authors: LaPrincess C Brewer; Sharonne N Hayes; Monica W Parker; Joyce E Balls-Berry; Michele Y Halyard; Vivian W Pinn; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Cheryl L Holt; Daisy Le; Joe Calvanelli; Jin Huang; Eddie M Clark; David L Roth; Beverly Williams; Emily Schulz Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Clifton C Addison; Brenda W Campbell-Jenkins; Daniel F Sarpong; Jeffery Kibler; Madhu Singh; Patricia Dubbert; Gregory Wilson; Thomas Payne; Herman Taylor Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.390