Literature DB >> 33466818

Modelling the Molecular Permeation through Mixed-Matrix Membranes Incorporating Tubular Fillers.

Ali Zamani1, F Handan Tezel1, Jules Thibault1.   

Abstract

Membrane-based processes are considered a promising separation method for many chemical and environmental applications such as pervaporation and gas separation. Numerous polymeric membranes have been used for these processes due to their good transport properties, ease of fabrication, and relatively low fabrication cost per unit membrane area. However, these types of membranes are suffering from the trade-off between permeability and selectivity. Mixed-matrix membranes, comprising a filler phase embedded into a polymer matrix, have emerged in an attempt to partly overcome some of the limitations of conventional polymer and inorganic membranes. Among them, membranes incorporating tubular fillers are new nanomaterials having the potential to transcend Robeson's upper bound. Aligning nanotubes in the host polymer matrix in the permeation direction could lead to a significant improvement in membrane permeability. However, although much effort has been devoted to experimentally evaluating nanotube mixed-matrix membranes, their modelling is mostly based on early theories for mass transport in composite membranes. In this study, the effective permeability of mixed-matrix membranes with tubular fillers was estimated from the steady-state concentration profile within the membrane, calculated by solving the Fick diffusion equation numerically. Using this approach, the effects of various structural parameters, including the tubular filler volume fraction, orientation, length-to-diameter aspect ratio, and permeability ratio were assessed. Enhanced relative permeability was obtained with vertically aligned nanotubes. The relative permeability increased with the filler-polymer permeability ratio, filler volume fraction, and the length-to-diameter aspect ratio. For water-butanol separation, mixed-matrix membranes using polydimethylsiloxane with nanotubes did not lead to performance enhancement in terms of permeability and selectivity. The results were then compared with analytical prediction models such as the Maxwell, Hamilton-Crosser and Kang-Jones-Nair (KJN) models. Overall, this work presents a useful tool for understanding and designing mixed-matrix membranes with tubular fillers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  butanol separation; finite differences; membrane permeability; mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs); nanotubes; polydimethylsiloxane membrane; tubular fillers

Year:  2021        PMID: 33466818      PMCID: PMC7829890          DOI: 10.3390/membranes11010058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Membranes (Basel)        ISSN: 2077-0375


  11 in total

1.  Rapid transport of gases in carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Anastasios I Skoulidas; David M Ackerman; J Karl Johnson; David S Sholl
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-10-14       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Mixed-Matrix Membranes Formed from Multi-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Gas Transport and Plasticization Resistance.

Authors:  Won Seok Chi; Benjamin J Sundell; Ke Zhang; Daniel J Harrigan; Steven C Hayden; Zachary P Smith
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.928

3.  MOF-Polymer Hybrid Materials: From Simple Composites to Tailored Architectures.

Authors:  Mark Kalaj; Kyle C Bentz; Sergio Ayala; Joseph M Palomba; Kyle S Barcus; Yuji Katayama; Seth M Cohen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Mixed matrix membrane incorporated with large pore size halloysite nanotubes (HNT) as filler for gas separation: experimental.

Authors:  S A Hashemifard; A F Ismail; T Matsuura
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Self-diffusion of water and simple alcohols in single-walled aluminosilicate nanotubes.

Authors:  Ji Zang; Suchitra Konduri; Sankar Nair; David S Sholl
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Metal-organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: a solution for highly efficient CO2 capture?

Authors:  Beatriz Seoane; Joaquin Coronas; Ignacio Gascon; Miren Etxeberria Benavides; Oğuz Karvan; Jürgen Caro; Freek Kapteijn; Jorge Gascon
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Control of porosity and pore size of metal reinforced carbon nanotube membranes.

Authors:  Ludovic Dumee; Leonora Velleman; Kallista Sears; Matthew Hill; Jurg Schutz; Niall Finn; Mikel Duke; Stephen Gray
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-21

8.  Gas Permeation Model of Mixed-Matrix Membranes with Embedded Impermeable Cuboid Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Haoyu Wu; Maryam Zamanian; Boguslaw Kruczek; Jules Thibault
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-15

9.  Separation of Organic Compounds from ABE Model Solutions via Pervaporation Using Activated Carbon/PDMS Mixed Matrix Membranes.

Authors:  Hoda Azimi; Arian Ebneyamini; F Handan Tezel; Jules Thibault
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-10

10.  Modeling of Gas Transport through Polymer/MOF Interfaces: A Microsecond-Scale Concentration Gradient-Driven Molecular Dynamics Study.

Authors:  Aydin Ozcan; Rocio Semino; Guillaume Maurin; A Ozgur Yazaydin
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 9.811

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pervaporation, Vapour Permeation and Membrane Distillation: From Membrane Fabrication to Application.

Authors:  Francesco Galiano; Roberto Castro-Muñoz; Alberto Figoli
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.